How many Trump voters will be burned by DOGE?
- Thread starter LotusBud
- Start date
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
They have to pay for the tax cuts they plan to give their donor class.
The stupidity is astounding.
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
I am tired of the ignorance of Americans.
- Reaction score
- 458
- Location
- In Amongst Ye's!
You know what I'm going to point out, don't you?
.05 of the actual deficit.
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
The tax cuts?
- Reaction score
- -391
- Location
- Earth
How many you pathetic bedwetter?
Did you have a figure in mind?
A quote from your reference........you are as bad at this as that bedwetter @The New Holliday
"The Missouri Republican added that doesn’t mean “taking anyone off of what they paid into so far,” but went on to say, “there is some waste, abuse and fraud in Medicare that we can take those numbers back and add to our general coffers and our treasury"
How sad and pathetic @LotusBud
......and you queefed and moaned about not getting money from something you admit not paying into........thats right you selfish "little bitch"
- Reaction score
- -391
- Location
- Earth
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
- Reaction score
- 19,340
- Location
- Asylum Earth
Is your black son still raping young girls?
- Reaction score
- -391
- Location
- Earth
You are on point Bedwetter!
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
I am, shit-wallower.
- Reaction score
- 2,437
- Location
- Chicagoland
"Pay" for tax cuts?
You do realize how utterly ignorant and stupid that makes you sound, don't you?
Tell me, Lily, if I make 100k one year, but only 50k the next year, who is "paying" for my reduction in revenue?
- Reaction score
- 19,340
- Location
- Asylum Earth
In the 34 years after 1946, the federal debt declined from 106 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to just 25 percent, despite the federal government’s running deficits in 26 of those years. The debt ratio declined for two reasons. First, the government ran a “primary,” or noninterest, surplus in a large majority of those years. This means that, not counting interest payments, the budget was in surplus. Second, the economic growth rate exceeded the Treasury interest rate in a large majority of those years. These two factors—along with the starting debt ratio—are the levers that control debt ratio sustainability.7 With a primary balance, the growth rate need only match the Treasury interest rate for the debt ratio to be stable. The presence of both primary surpluses and growth rates that exceeded the Treasury interest rate created significant downward pressure on the debt ratio.8
The nation’s fiscal pictured changed in 1981 when President Ronald Reagan enacted the largest tax cut in U.S. history,9 reducing revenues by the equivalent of $19 trillion over a decade in today’s terms. Although Congress raised taxes10 in many of the subsequent years of the Reagan administration to claw back close to half the revenue loss,11 the equivalent of $10 trillion of the president’s 1981 tax cut remained.
These massive tax cuts set off more than a decade of bipartisan efforts to reduce spending and increase revenues, which, along with a booming economy, resulted in budget surpluses at the end of the Clinton administration.
- Reaction score
- 2,437
- Location
- Chicagoland
I already know you're too stupid to answer the simple question, but I'm interested in Lily's take an the analogy.Stop being stupid.
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
GFY, disingenuous douchebag.
The working classes are funding/subsidizing the taxes that they wealthy class don't pay.
- Reaction score
- 1,541
- Location
- United States
ZERO!!! MAGA!! Butt hurt liberals made all this possible!!
- Reaction score
- 2,437
- Location
- Chicagoland
It's a seriously serious question, Lily. I hear you Democrat types say all the time that tax cuts have to be "paid for."
Why does a reduction in revenue for government have to be "paid for," but reductions in revenue for individuals and families and private businesses do not?
Is the question too hard for you?
- Reaction score
- 19,340
- Location
- Asylum Earth
"Oooh Look how the flames on the Cuyahoga River light up the sky!"
- Reaction score
- 2,437
- Location
- Chicagoland
I guess Lily can't think up anything relevant or pithy to say.
... and Admin poastes a cartoon.
... and Admin poastes a cartoon.
Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 22,951
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Because what is cut comes at the expense of the American people. They pay, pay, pay, and pay some more, while the wealthier become ever wealthier and take advantage of loopholes their whores in Congress make for them. They keep accumulating wealth as the rest of the America slides into ever precarious circumstances.
It's sad that you're too stupid to realize you're one of those payees.
- Reaction score
- 1,541
- Location
- United States
decades ago
"Oooh Look how the flames on the Cuyahoga River light up the sky!"
- Reaction score
- 2,437
- Location
- Chicagoland
Uh, no. What they (the government) SPENDS comes at the expense of the American People.
I'm seriously trying to understand the mindset that cannot see the one-to-one analogy between an individual, family, or business that has a revenue stream that they must manage and live within and a government that has a revenue stream that it must manage and live within.
Back to my original question in this thread: If tax cuts must be "paid for," then who is paying for my revenue shortfalls should I bring in less revenue next year?
How many what? Stupid Americans? Every single one who voted for tRump.
I can tell you ne thing for sure, massive companies, like Apple and GE and oil companies, etc., sure as hell are not paying their share.
- Reaction score
- -391
- Location
- Earth
The subject (people) of.the question you asked in the title of the thread you started bedwetter. You are either that ignorant, or your post above is the lamest attempt at trolling ever......
Perhaps you are a poor betwetting excuse of an ignorant troll
- Reaction score
- -391
- Location
- Earth
Good Morning Bedwetters!
Similar threads
- Poll
