- Reaction score
- 19,901
Why is it the GOP that is keeping the impeachment discussion alive?
- Thread starter Admin.
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
At least you admit you utter ignorance. RINO Republicans suck dick harder than you do.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
MAGAt is fine with me. We want to Make America Great Again and you people want to see our nation destroyed.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Fair on your first point. Me cago en el otro.
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
Of course you people want to destroy America. Obama wanted to "fundamentally transform" America into a dystopian third world shithole and you all followed along for no other reason than he was half nigger.
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Ridiculous.
I voted for Obama the first time because of the fuck up Dubya was. In 2012, I did not. His race has nothing to do with it.
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
I agree. Obama's mulattoness was never an issue for me, it was his Marxist/Leninist ideology I had a problem with.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
He's hardly a Marxist. One thing he has in common with Trump is that people projected onto him what they want to see rather than who he really is...
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
Yeah, there was probably a bit of that with Obama -- and a whole lot of that with Trump.
But, yes, he was and is an America-hating Marxist and Big Mike is a hate-filled racist negress.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
We'll have to disagree on their "Marxism". I don't see one single policy that they supported that is Marxist.
Can you name one?
- Reaction score
- 2,477
- Location
- Chicagoland
All of them. Obamacare = Marxist. "Green Energy" and "shovel ready grifts" = Marxist redistribution schemes.
Whatever happened to those "shovel ready" infrastructure projects from the Obama years anyway? As I recall, a lot of money was appropriated but I haven't noticed our roads and bridges getting any upgrades.
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
*cough*Obamacare*cough*
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
No, it's a social safety net, like most industrialized societies.
The hospitals and all the equipment in the facility along with the personnel do not work for the government. That is all private.
Green energy and other big government projects, just like the internet was, over time are beneficial to the American taxpayer. Now you may not approve. bBut that's the thing about living in this country, not one side decides all the policy in the country.
We became the most powerful country on the planet within this system. When will your side stop whining about progress?
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
No doubt we all benefited (somehow...) from Solyndra.
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
Just a reminder: In a democracy (which leftists claim to want to defend -- ironically, they want to defend it against democracy...) the people tell the government what their interests are; the government, on the one hand, represents and works to support and fulfil those interests and, on the other hand, stays the fuck out of the way.
It does not, however, do whatever the fuck it feels like and then proceed to justify its actions by telling the people what their interests 'ought to be'.
If you're defending that latter system, you are not defending democracy.
It does not, however, do whatever the fuck it feels like and then proceed to justify its actions by telling the people what their interests 'ought to be'.
If you're defending that latter system, you are not defending democracy.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
You think that the 452 million dollar bridge to nowhere in Alaska was a better plan?
How about the F35 that could be, maybe still is, sidelined by a little rain?
Government fucks up, but often just one investment, like the internet, makes up in trillions of dollars of business that more than covers those fuck ups.
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
The DARPAnet was government. Are you using the military DARPAnet right now?
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Yes, it was government. That's what I'm saying, it was taxpayers dollars that made it happen.
Hello?!
OP
OP
- Reaction score
- 19,901
The Tax Dollars that Al Gore had a hand in getting funded
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
The point is that government didn't commercialize it. The internet, as distinct from the ARPAnet, was developed and built by Ciena Corporation.
Transition towards the Internet
The term "internet" was reflected in the first RFC published on the TCP protocol (RFC 675: Internet Transmission Control Program, December 1974) as a short form of internetworking, when the two terms were used interchangeably. In general, an internet was a collection of networks linked by a common protocol. In the time period when the ARPANET was connected to the newly formed project in the late 1980s, the term was used as the name of the network, Internet, being the large and global TCP/IP network.Opening the Internet and the fiber optic backbone to corporate and consumers increased demand for network capacity. The expense and delay of laying new fiber led providers to test a fiber bandwidth expansion alternative that had been pioneered in the late 1970s by using "interactions between light and matter, such as lasers and optical devices used for and wave mixing". This technology became known as . Bell Labs deployed a 4-channel WDM system in 1995. To develop a mass capacity (dense) WDM system, and its former head of Light Systems Research, formed a new venture, , that deployed the world's first dense WDM system on the Sprint fiber network in June 1996. This was referred to as the real start of optical networking.
While government sowed the seed, it didn't bloom until it went private.
OP
OP
- Reaction score
- 19,901
Who came first, the chicken or the congressional budget allocation?
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
Did the government create the commercial Hummer H3?
Nope. The government catalyzed the development of the HMMWV. The commercially available Hummer is based on that design, but it's (pay attention, now!) not the same vehicle.
You are not using the ARPAnet to read this. It's not the same thing.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
There is no one more blind than he who does not want to see.
Lily
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 23,604
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
The government funded the research that made the commercial versions possible. FFS!
- Reaction score
- 538
- Location
- Watching From the Hliðskjálf
Nope. The government doesn't fund shit; taxpayers do.
I'm not generally quoted in the media, pal. SMH at the obtuseness of your mind.
OP
OP
- Reaction score
- 19,901
