How to find your G spot?

OP
OP
MrNiceGuy

MrNiceGuy

peace through anarchy
Site Supporter
Reaction score
103
Location
yes
I'm sure there is a barb in your post somewheres; but much like the beloved honeybee, which is far more useful than yourself, you died right after the sting stang stunk.

And I'm still John Travolta staying alive sans the scientology hail bop comet ride to drinking cyanide laced powder mixes.

Even if you got something over on me; I have the protection of not having all my faculties. Man beats woman. Sober beats drunk.

You're all teh gloat without being the goat.

Woooooopiteeeee dooooooo ~ Adam Sandler

Problem with that rejoinder? You explicitly confirmed what I suspected in the post immediately preceding it when you admitted that you habitually post drunk.

Dumbass lush. lol
[/QUOTE]
You should probably edit this lest you appear as drunk as moi yet still as dim as a bulb with planned obsolescence being right before your failure of a post.

Shiner?

Means: Shiner bock. Shiner moonshining. Shiner punched in the face with an eight ball hemmorrage like the black eye I just gave you.

And why did you change nicknames? What was the old one? SomeDumGay?

Probs.
 

Courier 6

When the going gets weird, the weird turn Pro.
IMMunity Hack
Reaction score
624
Location
Sailing The Seas Of Cheese
Problem with that rejoinder? You explicitly confirmed what I suspected in the post immediately preceding it when you admitted that you habitually post drunk.

Dumbass lush. lol
you should probably edit this lest you appear as drunk as moi yet still as dim as a bulb with planned obsolescence being right before your failure of a post.

Shiner?

Means: Shiner bock. Shiner moonshining. Shiner punched in the face with an eight ball hemmorrage like the black eye I just gave you.

And why did you change nicknames? What was the old one? SomeDumGay?

Probs.

Sleep it off, drunkie.
 

Seamajor

Site Supporter
Reaction score
8,009
Scouse, maybe you have a wealthy Jewish uncle who wants to leave you 12.5 billion?
 

Jack

Take heart amid the deepening gloom
Site Supporter
Reaction score
5,323
Location
Upper US
Why won't you acknowledge that the existence of gas chambers could not be proved in court?
Because it was.

Yes, the existence of Nazi gas chambers, specifically those used for mass murder, has been
proven in court, including the Nuremberg trials and subsequent cases related to Holocaust denial.

Here's why and how this proof was established:
  • Overwhelming Evidence: The prosecution at the Nuremberg trials presented a vast amount of evidence, including Nazi-authored documents, testimonies from both victims and perpetrators, films, and photographs.
  • Witness Testimony:
    • Survivors: Numerous Holocaust survivors, including Sonderkommandos forced to work at the extermination camps, testified about the use of gas chambers and the mass killings they witnessed.
    • Perpetrators: Nazi officials, including Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss, confessed to their roles in the extermination process, providing detailed accounts of gassing procedures.
  • Documentary Evidence: Nazi documents, such as blueprints, orders for Zyklon B (the poison gas used), and records of mass shootings, supported the existence of the gas chambers and their purpose.
  • Judicial Notice: In the United States, at least one court has taken "judicial notice" of the fact that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz, meaning the court recognized it as common knowledge and did not require additional proof.
  • Forensic Evidence: Forensic analysis conducted in Poland confirmed the presence of Prussian blue, a derivative of hydrogen cyanide, in the gas chambers, consistent with the use of Zyklon B.
Important Note: It's crucial to distinguish between gas chambers used for extermination and those used for delousing (disinfection). While some deniers claim that gas chambers were only used for disinfection, the evidence presented in court overwhelmingly supports their use for mass murder.

  • It is important to note: While some Holocaust deniers have tried to discredit this evidence, their claims have been refuted in court. For example, the "Leuchter Report," a pseudo-scientific analysis often cited by deniers, was found to be based on flawed methodology and erroneous assumptions.

In conclusion, the evidence presented in various legal proceedings has definitively established the historical reality of the Nazi gas chambers and their use for mass murder.

This will be the ONLY time I respond to your bullshit about this ever again.

Also read this:
71GMQv2QHES._SL1500_.jpg


And finally, shut the fuck up.
 

Adam Hitler

Exclusive Member of...
Avatar Hack'd
Reaction score
14,493
Location
Taking a dump in Alticus' yamake
They literally stated in court that there was no physical evidence to prove the existence of gas chambers, you retard. Witness testimony is not fucking evidence.

Where is the source of your copy pasta?
 

Jack

Take heart amid the deepening gloom
Site Supporter
Reaction score
5,323
Location
Upper US
They literally stated in court that there was no physical evidence you retard. Witness testimony is not fucking evidence.

Where is the source of your copy pasta?
They literally stated the opposite, all part of the public record.

Post where they didn't. With reliable sources.

Since you made the comment. Otherwise shut up. This discussion is not about disputing what's in the public record already.