Well, hello there, Garraty!
<raises my HurryCane and waves it in Flynn's direction>
How come you peeps can't get it through your metal plated heads that the truth is not always as juicy as you'd like it to be?
I honestly don't know what you're on about.
Truth is truth whether or not it's juicy, whether or not I like it, and whether or not it matches my current understanding of things. I'm not even a huge fan of "juice" as you damn well ought to know by now. Drama makes my knuckles itch in a way that only forced acceleration into someone's vulnerable areas can scratch.
Garraty, spare me the "who me" run around. We've had this conversation before where you were likened to Mr. Wilson.
...and it was inaccurate then as it is now.
You're confusing an occasional piece of performance art for the person doing the performing.
Again.
You're a linear thinker with outside the box tendencies when the box gets too stifling.
Thinking linearly is only one way to do it and can be the optimal choice. Or not. There are times that obviously favor intuitive thinking, or deductive reasoning, or if/then do/while loops, or simply emptying oneself and tranquilly awaiting inspiration. Nobody should *only* think one way or another all the time; that's a recipe for disaster.
I mean it could lead someone to, for example, repeatedly accuse the most zen-like mofo at this forum of being "cranky" because he thinks it's fun to play the part of a cantankerous geezer now and then.
How embarrassing would *that* be?
I'm not trying to goad you into anything.
Bless your heart.
It's surely for the best but you're welcome to try sometime if you like.
The mere fact that you are denying how much you and Admin. have in common is pretty brash, considering how closely you resemble one another in actions and in looks.
Tsk tsk.
It's like you're trying to disguise a flyswatter by taping a "100% Not A Flyswatter" label to the handle.
If you're fooling anyone it must be yourself.