We're with Ice ma'am, we're here to protect and serve and keep Merica safe.

So you approve of a government mandate?
I approve of a secure election system. What we have now is not secure and We the People have little confidence in systems that count ballots days and weeks AFTER election day. It's almost as if they wait until they know how many ballots they need to get certain Candidates over the finish line with an electoral victory, and it's always, always, always Democrats that seem to benefit by these long and drawn out counts.

I mean, fuck, even France can hold an election and manage to get all the votes counted before the next morning.

And "harmful" to whom?
 
I approve of a secure election system. What we have now is not secure and We the People have little confidence in systems that count ballots days and weeks AFTER election day. It's almost as if they wait until they know how many ballots they need to get certain Candidates over the finish line with an electoral victory, and it's always, always, always Democrats that seem to benefit by these long and drawn out counts.

I mean, fuck, even France can hold an election and manage to get all the votes counted before the next morning.

And "harmful" to whom?
It's a government mandate. Not rocket science.
 
So are you, but ha doesn't mean there's anything right or good about it.


It's all right there in the links, ol pal.
All you gotta do is read them and you'll know what everyone who hasn't chosen to remain willfully ignorant already knows.
Those are all just whines and what ifs. Only persons invested in ballot fraud would be against anything in the Bill.

I asked you to tell me who is "harmed" by anything in the Bill. You can't think of anyone who might be "harmed?" Surely you yourself read all your AI drivel, right? So who is "harmed" by making ballot integrity more secure and making it harder for anyone to cheat?

Anyone?
 
yourself read all your AI drivel, right?
What AI stuff? It was all links to articles analyzing the bill and outlining the harm to legitimate voters that will be done.
. As I've written before and as is also suggested in at least one of the links, why is the burden not on the government to provide the necessary ID to legit voters? If the goob can identify illegal voters surly they can identify the legit voter and provide each with a voter ID.
 
Just another unarmed person shot by ICE.
. Move along, nothing to see here.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and wounded a man Sunday afternoon in Texas' capital of Austin, local authorities said, and anti-ICE protesters quickly gathered at the scene.

The unnamed man was in serious but stable condition at a hospital after being shot once in the torso on the city's north side, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said at a news conference with the mayor and other city officials.

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, did not participate in the news conference and didn't immediately respond to requests for details.

Austin police officers were not involved in the operation or the shooting, which occurred after a traffic stop, Davis told reporters.


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, a Democrat, said he wants the city's police department to be involved in the investigation so it can provide "clear, third-party eyes" in the process. Watson said he does not think it would be appropriate for ICE to conduct an investigation on its own.

Austin residents have "a right to feel safe in their city," Watson said. A proper investigation will only enhance credibility, he added.
 
Only wounded? Amateur hour.
I would never have thought that hiring a bunch of clowns that couldn't get hired by the local police or enlist in the military and barely training them in basic law enforcement, arrest procedures, crowd control, when and how to use deadly force etc would result in so many needless random shootings. Maybe they need testosterone testing like the Army is doing now.
 
What AI stuff? It was all links to articles analyzing the bill and outlining the harm to legitimate voters that will be done.
. As I've written before and as is also suggested in at least one of the links, why is the burden not on the government to provide the necessary ID to legit voters? If the goob can identify illegal voters surly they can identify the legit voter and provide each with a voter ID.
I just saw this and I notice you, again, didn't answer the simple question. WHO IS HARMED by strengthening ballot integrity? I notice you just waved at your AI sputum and said "it's in there" in so many words. Then you spew some drool about Voter ID, which you Leftist Scum are opposed to because it's in the Bill that you oppose, and never tell me in your own words WHO IS HARMED IN ANY WAY by anything in the Bill.

Try again.
 
I just saw this and I notice you, again, didn't answer the simple question. WHO IS HARMED by strengthening ballot integrity?
LoLz, Reggie, Did you bother to review the links I provided\?
. No?
Well, that explains why you don't know the answer.
Don't ask that ridiculous question until you have and understand it well enough to answer your own question.
 
LoLz, Reggie, Did you bother to review the links I provided\?
. No?
Well, that explains why you don't know the answer.
Don't ask that ridiculous question until you have and understand it well enough to answer your own question.
I skimmed what what your betters have told to to think, but I didn't catch where they explained WHO IS HARMED by securing ballot integrity.

Can you provide me a quick overview with examples of this "harm" that will supposedly harm innocent citizens if the SAVE Act is passed?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
Two young American men were on their way to the US Marine Corps Recruiting Office in Alamo Texas, until Ice goons attacked them yanking them out of their car throwing them to the ground, beating, macing and handcuffing them, breaking one of the prospective Marine's wrist.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



If you support this kind of behavior by ICE, Fuck You too.
 
I skimmed what what your betters have told to to think, but I didn't catch where they explained WHO IS HARMED by securing ballot integrity.

Can you provide me a quick overview with examples of this "harm" that will supposedly harm innocent citizens if the SAVE Act is passed?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Dude, wake up, it's never going to happen as proposed in the SAVE act.
.It amounts to a poll tax.
My way is the only proper good and wholesome way, which means conservatives will oppose it.
..and since everyone else knows it's unneccessary it will never get done.
 
Two young American men were on their way to the US Marine Corps Recruiting Office in Alamo Texas, until Ice goons attacked them yanking them out of their car throwing them to the ground, beating, macing and handcuffing them, breaking one of the prospective Marine's wrist.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



If you support this kind of behavior by ICE, Fuck You too.
Suck a Hobo dick, Traiitor! Anchor babies are not "citizens" and these little inferior third worlders should be deported just for being anti-Ice Leftist scum shitbags.
 
Dude, wake up, it's never going to happen as proposed in the SAVE act.
.It amounts to a poll tax.
My way is the only proper good and wholesome way, which means conservatives will oppose it.
..and since everyone else knows it's unneccessary it will never get done.
Please explain how this is a "poll tax?" That's about the dumbest thing I've ever seen you poast.

I asked you a simple question. Please explain exactly WHO is HARMED by anything in the SAVE Act and HOW they are HARMED. You AI links to where your Betters tell how you're supposed to think repeatedly claim that citizens will be "harmed" by the passgae of the SAVE Act, but they never get around to explaining what this "harm" is or how this "harm" works by requiring photo ID to cast a ballot and proof of citizenship to register to vote.

I thought you might be able to explain it to me since none of your links do.
 
Suck a Hobo dick, Traiitor! Anchor babies are not "citizens" and these little inferior third worlders should be deported just for being anti-Ice Leftist scum shitbags.
Then Melania needs deporting. That's what she is.

And there's some unanswered question about his Mom as well.
 
Please explain exactly WHO is HARMED by anything in the SAVE Act
it isnt the SAVE act thats the problem...it's that he's trying to install it as an EO and he just doesn't have that power.

We're all harmed if he's given it.

Tell me dr cuntpants how long does it take to get a passport, anyway?
 
it isnt the SAVE act thats the problem...it's that he's trying to install it as an EO and he just doesn't have that power.

We're all harmed if he's given it.

Tell me dr cuntpants how long does it take to get a passport, anyway?
I'm talking about the pending Act, dummy, not the EO which I agree is an overstep. Who is "harmed" by what is in the pending legislation? Your Betters are claiming that people will be "harmed" by requiring photo ID to cast a ballot, proof of citizenship to register to vote and mandating that the States clean up and verify their voter rolls. Who does that "harm?"
 
I'm talking about the pending Act, dummy, not the EO which I agree is an overstep. Who is "harmed" by what is in the pending legislation? Your Betters are claiming that people will be "harmed" by requiring photo ID to cast a ballot, proof of citizenship to register to vote and mandating that the States clean up and verify their voter rolls. Who does that "harm?"
Anyone could tell you straight away. It's all be put in front of you.
..but it doesn't matter. You'll ask the same question again tomorrow.
 
Sure I can, and you know too.
You can play dumb,
and you ain't half bad at it,
but the fact is you know the answer.
Again, you can't say who is "harmed" because you don't know. Neither do I, but your Betters tell you there will be "harm" but never explained to you how.

You could just make something up, but you know that would just make you look even more stupid than you've already made yourself look.
 
but never explained.
Yes it was...stop being silly.

Not that it matters anyway, because the bill is dead.
...and it will be dead for at least 10 years after the midterms
since Repukes will lose control of congress then the WH for 8 years after.
Sorry, Reggie. No one's gonna be fixin what ain't broke.
 
Last edited: