Everyone not left is a terrorist!!!

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

No one is talk about going against the Constitution.

You've been brainwashed to think the idiots we put in office to represent us somehow ARE the powerful keepers of the Constitution.

Cleaning house and placing actual representation in government is an American tradition.

You really think the government is more than it is and it shows.

 

[Murdock]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

 

[Lily]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

 

[Lokmar]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

The government is NOT the Constitution. The fuck?

Who said "over throw the Constitution"?

See what we mean about you useful idiots? Our government is gonna go full blown authoritarian and you think they ARE the Constitution. Scary shit, Admin.

The Constitution is literally the contract that defines the structure of the Country, you simp.

SCOTUS's job is to determine what legal issues agree or disagree with the Constitution. Hello?

Yep.

But cleaning out the government is not an act of treason against the Constitution. The Constitution is there to restrain the government.....not fuckibg merge with it into a fucking one party authoritarian rule.

Hello indeed.

 

[Lokmar]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

I dont care, slut.

 

[Lily]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

I dont care, slut.

Sure you do. You wouldn't respond otherwise, racist hillbilly scum.

 

[Dove]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

The fuck is she seriously up in here spewing racism?

Fucking throw a fried twinky into a meltdown. Maybe she will cardiac arrest while chasing it.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

No, it's Dove's contention that the Constitution includes a suicide pact, or some kind of mechanism for the Citizens to overturn the document by force of violence or something, not sure what she's getting at.

 

[Murdock]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

I like how you play a 3rd grade level of the card game “WAR” in your head with a loaded deck lolz

It happens to white people is your weak delusional justification as to why it is ok that this happens. I’m saying they are all criminals and throw the book at them, gimp.

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

No, it's Dove's contention that the Constitution includes a suicide pact, or some kind of mechanism for the Citizens to overturn the document by force of violence or something, not sure what she's getting at.

That's not at all what's being said you psycho cuck!

This fucking guy. He thinks the government and the Constitution are ONE.

Wow.

 

[Lokmar]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

I dont care, slut.

Sure you do. You wouldn't respond otherwise, racist hillbilly scum.

You retarded manatee, I mentioned it because I thought the skit was funny and relevant. Not because I think Chapell and I are kindred spirits. Fukin moron!

 

[Dove]

Overthrowing an abusive government as per the DOI..... in Admins GovCo cuckes brain, it's the same thing as trashing the Constitution.

Smh.

Hey Admin, didnr jim crow Joe just recently admit he did an unconstitutional thing? How is that even possible since in your head he IS the constitution?

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

No, it's Dove's contention that the Constitution includes a suicide pact, or some kind of mechanism for the Citizens to overturn the document by force of violence or something, not sure what she's getting at.

That's not at all what's being said you psycho cuck!

This fucking guy. He thinks the government and the Constitution are ONE.

Wow.

The Constitution has three main functions. First it creates a national government consisting of a legislative, an executive, and a judicial branch, with a system of checks and balances among the three branches. Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states. And third, it protects various individual liberties of American citizens.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

 

[Lily]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

The government is NOT the Constitution. The fuck?

Who said "over throw the Constitution"?

See what we mean about you useful idiots? Our government is gonna go full blown authoritarian and you think they ARE the Constitution. Scary shit, Admin.

Doesn't understand facetious posts duly noted.

 

[Dove]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

I dont care, slut.

Sure you do. You wouldn't respond otherwise, racist hillbilly scum.

You retarded manatee, I mentioned it because I thought the skit was funny and relevant. Not because I think Chapell and I are kindred spirits. Fukin moron!

You sure?

 

[Omnipotent]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

No, it's Dove's contention that the Constitution includes a suicide pact, or some kind of mechanism for the Citizens to overturn the document by force of violence or something, not sure what she's getting at.

That's not at all what's being said you psycho cuck!

This fucking guy. He thinks the government and the Constitution are ONE.

Wow.

The Constitution has three main functions. First it creates a national government consisting of a legislative, an executive, and a judicial branch, with a system of checks and balances among the three branches. Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states. And third, it protects various individual liberties of American citizens.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Yep.

So how does getting rid of government officials who abuse our rights and liberties mean "over throwing the constitution"?

You either dont understand what is being said, or you have a boot so far in your skull you cant separate government from the Constitution.

 

[Lily]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

That goes to show you that for all the money you think you have, other whites recognize you as the piece of shit that you are and don't want you around.

 

[Lokmar]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

The fuck is she seriously up in here spewing racism?

Fucking throw a fried twinky into a meltdown. Maybe she will cardiac arrest while chasing it.

Sweet jeebus, people get followed all the damn time! It happened to me frequently. I drove a jacked up muscle car with loud exhaust, had a white trash look, and probably looked like I was up to no good most of the time. I dealt with it. Now, I drive a loud modern day musclecar that does 200mph and the cops follow me on the regular. Shit, I do no more then 20 in the hood and STILL get ugly looks from the residents! Do I get bent about it? FUK NO! I expect it, dont give many fux, and go on about my life. I just make damn sure I dont get on it until I'm on the main road.

 

[Admin.]

Overthrowing an abusive government as per the DOI..... in Admins GovCo cuckes brain, it's the same thing as trashing the Constitution.

Smh.

Hey Admin, didnr jim crow Joe just recently admit he did an unconstitutional thing? How is that even possible since in your head he IS the constitution?

LOLOLOL WTAF, The Declaration Of Independence calls for declaring independence from America?



Wow!

 

[Lily]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

Dave Chappelle would find you to be an abhorrent racist. Don't let's get confused about how you're not on the same side he's on.

I dont care, slut.

Sure you do. You wouldn't respond otherwise, racist hillbilly scum.

You retarded manatee, I mentioned it because I thought the skit was funny and relevant. Not because I think Chapell and I are kindred spirits. Fukin moron!

I don't care why you mentioned it, you're a racist fucking piece of shit.

 

[Dove]

Overthrowing an abusive government as per the DOI..... in Admins GovCo cuckes brain, it's the same thing as trashing the Constitution.

Smh.

Hey Admin, didnr jim crow Joe just recently admit he did an unconstitutional thing? How is that even possible since in your head he IS the constitution?

LOLOLOL WTAF, The Declaration Of Independence calls for declaring independence from America?



Wow!

Answer my question about Biden.

If Biden IS the Constitution, how could he act unconstitutionally?

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

The constitution can’t rebel against itself. The traitors would have to be convicted of treason in the court and that’s the connection to the constitution you’re trying to make.

No, it's Dove's contention that the Constitution includes a suicide pact, or some kind of mechanism for the Citizens to overturn the document by force of violence or something, not sure what she's getting at.

That's not at all what's being said you psycho cuck!

This fucking guy. He thinks the government and the Constitution are ONE.

Wow.

The Constitution has three main functions. First it creates a national government consisting of a legislative, an executive, and a judicial branch, with a system of checks and balances among the three branches. Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states. And third, it protects various individual liberties of American citizens.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Yep.

So how does getting rid of government officials who abuse our rights and liberties mean "over throwing the constitution"?

You either dont understand what is being said, or you have a boot so far in your skull you cant separate government from the Constitution.

The Government is not just Trump, or Biden or even Matt Gaetz, reread the above opening definition of the doc again.

 

[Lily]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.

Yes, he's a murdering piece of shit.

 

[Lokmar]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.

It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

 

[Lokmar]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

You stupid hypocritical race baiting bitch! This shit happens to white people ALL THE FUCKING TIME! In fact, me and a friend were in the hollyweird hills in 93, driving around and looking at all the houses and shit and we were followed by a concerned citizen. Know what? I wasnt surprised and we left! Why should niggers expect different? As far as brandishing a gun, you lying whore, THAT NEVER HAPPENED!!! PWN3D!

That goes to show you that for all the money you think you have, other whites recognize you as the piece of shit that you are and don't want you around.

That goes to show you you're racial crying is bullshit! PWN3D!

 

[Admin.]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.

It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

OJ did not kill Nicole! Court done said so!

 

[Dove]

Admin you know in America...we used to execute government officials who abused their position, right?

It was our RIGHT.

Was that overthrowing the Constitution?

 

[Lily]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.

It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

He was just trying to defend himself from some creepy guy that was following him.