For only 1.99 A Month, you can provide 4 Coat Hangers for the women of Texas.

[Admin.]

 

[Admin.]

 

[Dove]

Not that it matters to you people, but the coat hanger shit is myth.

Back alley abortions were done by doctors. And its STILL a very nasty back ally procedure that women suffer from.

But dont care about that. Just bitch about states where the people dont mindlessly support crimes against humanity like you think they should.

Looks like men should start getting vasectomies for when they wanna bang a woman but don't want their income interrupted. WIN.

It's always a cry fest from scrotes and their handmaids whenever women are spared suffering to make life easier for men, and men finally have to accept responsibility.

Go get snipped. You know...."get rid of" before it's a living human being and you are dumping a scared woman off in abortuary parking lot.

 

[Admin.]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

 

[Lily]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

Then they're released at 18 into a world alone.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

According to libs murder is the answer if you are selfish fucktard that refuses to take care of your own.

 

[Dove]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

And if you cared about foster kids outside of using them as examples of human beings who shouldnt be alive?

You would know the majority of those kids have parents who STILL have parental rights and are fighting to get them BACK.

I'm so SICK of your heartless, mindless bullshit that the STATE should decide who lives and dies. Just because the STATE destroys the families of POOR people by ripping loved and wanted children away from low income families.

So yeah Admin.....dont analyse how your precious state might be harming people and families. Just look up 400k reasons to dump women off at abortion clinics and brutally rip apart human beings before they are born. We dont need any thought past that, do we?

This is exactly WHY you people shouldnt be allowed to vote and make decisions for society. You create a sterile, inhumane system that destroys lives and refuse to look at it.

You want less foster kids? Check your damn STATE.

 

[Dove]

According to libs murder is the answer if you are selfish fucktard that refuses to take care of your own.

Most kids in foster care were ripped from loving parents who were just poor. People who cant advocate or defend themselves against an unchecked state entity with far too much power over people. Specifically low income people.

Its oppressive and abusive.

And those children are apparently lacking in value and shouldnt be alive, according to Admin. And most pro aborts.

They should be honest and just own their hatred of the poor/working classes and support state tyranny and eugenics.

But....they are cowards.

They absolutely HATE anyone who works to make life better for others.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

According to libs murder is the answer if you are selfish fucktard that refuses to take care of your own.

Most kids in foster care were ripped from loving parents who were just poor. People who cant advocate or defend themselves against an unchecked state entity with far too much power over people. Specifically low income people.

Its oppressive and abusive.

And those children are apparently lacking in value and shouldnt be alive, according to Admin. And most pro aborts.

They should be honest and just own their hatred of the poor/working classes and support state tyranny and eugenics.

But....they are cowards.

I'm all for letting libs murder their own sprogs. the less of them the better. I'd just like to see them arrested for it afterwards

two birds with one stone kind of a thing

 

[Dove]

According to libs murder is the answer if you are selfish fucktard that refuses to take care of your own.

Most kids in foster care were ripped from loving parents who were just poor. People who cant advocate or defend themselves against an unchecked state entity with far too much power over people. Specifically low income people.

Its oppressive and abusive.

And those children are apparently lacking in value and shouldnt be alive, according to Admin. And most pro aborts.

They should be honest and just own their hatred of the poor/working classes and support state tyranny and eugenics.

But....they are cowards.

I'm all for letting libs murder their own sprogs. the less of them the better. I'd just like to see them arrested for it afterwards

two birds with one stone kind of a thing

Then you have to agree that women are entitled to full informed consent.

Not the absolutely FALSE bullshit leftwing abortion supporters sell about life in the womb and the risks of abortion and exactly what it does.

Because I know first hand how they blatantly LIE.

 

[Lokmar]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

Why havent you murdered em all with coat hangars?

 

[Dove]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

Why havent you murdered em all with coat hangars?

400k children in foster you say?

HAVE YOU TRIED ABORTING HARDER?

 

[Omnipotent]

I am going repost something from another board about abortion.... some people won't like it, others will though. This unnessary debate needs a science twist to it...

 

[Blazor]

400,000 children

According to the most recent federal data, there are currently more than 400,000 children in foster care in the United States. They range in age from infants to 21 years old (in some states). The average age of a child in foster care is more than 8 years old, and there are slightly more boys than girls.

How about making it easier to adopt, for starters. Do you even know how much it costs to adopt a child?

There are parents who cant even have kids, who would LOVE to adopt a child, but cant afford it.


I approve of this heartbeat law!!! If a baby in the womb has a heartbeat, and you kill it, thats MURDER!!

 

[Omnipotent]

This will EXPLAIN something very important...

You can read the argument between a Canadian (Spork) man and Salem, a female Australian.. The main information to this post is the 3rd paragraph.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

No, your arguments are nonsense, as is your desperate plea to The Holocaust and African American slaves, ignoring the very fact that you are advocating for Gestational Slavery. There is a reason that Forced Pregnancy is considered by the UN and every other body as a Human Rights Violation.

Whether they are a genetic person or not, is irrelevant. It doesn't exist. It is not a human being. Also, there is an argument to be made that a Blastocyst is a person from IMPLANTATION. Not from conception, as 80% of all fertilised eggs do not IMPLANT.

Human life does NOT start at conception, even scientists and doctors disagree with you there.
Most fertilized eggs don't even attach to the uterine wall. An estimated 60% to 85% of fertilized eggs fail to 'take' and leave the body during a period. This is not a miscarriage, this is well before that. So how, scientifically, can *life* begin at conception, when 60% at bare minimum, die straight away? THAT, is why scientists don't believe life begins at conception. Because up to 85% of conceptions don't stick to the uterine wall. 85%. That means only 15% of life begins at conception. That, is why pro-choicers have SCIENCE on their side. Even scientists don't agree that life begins at conception, partly because most fertilised eggs don't even implant, but because the fetus is not sentient until week 26/27, scientists say when the fetus has sentience and a brain stem and nervous system, which is not until the THIRD TRIMESTER.

hplusbiopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/inconsistancy-in-the-life-begins-at-conception-argument

 

[Omnipotent]

How about making it easier to adopt, for starters.

Because paedophiles adopt children. My son met a girl with Cystic fibrosis. She was adopted from a Romanian orphanage by an English couple and brought to Australia. She was sexually abused by the beast who adopted her. It went to court and the old beast had to pay her 10s of thousands of dollars in compensation. The girl was a talented concert pianist as well.

Adoption is just child trafficking... You're better off dead than be diddled and having a lifetime of being torn between becoming a serial killer or suiciding...

Real life isn't like what the movies portray about how wonderful being adopted is.

Yes, there are indeed success stories but they are far less common than you think.

 

[Dove]

This will EXPLAIN something very important...

You can read the argument between a Canadian (Spork) man and Salem, a female Australian.. The main information to this post is the 3rd paragraph.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

No, your arguments are nonsense, as is your desperate plea to The Holocaust and African American slaves, ignoring the very fact that you are advocating for Gestational Slavery. There is a reason that Forced Pregnancy is considered by the UN and every other body as a Human Rights Violation.

Whether they are a genetic person or not, is irrelevant. It doesn't exist. It is not a human being. Also, there is an argument to be made that a Blastocyst is a person from IMPLANTATION. Not from conception, as 80% of all fertilised eggs do not IMPLANT.

Human life does NOT start at conception, even scientists and doctors disagree with you there.
Most fertilized eggs don't even attach to the uterine wall. An estimated 60% to 85% of fertilized eggs fail to 'take' and leave the body during a period. This is not a miscarriage, this is well before that. So how, scientifically, can *life* begin at conception, when 60% at bare minimum, die straight away? THAT, is why scientists don't believe life begins at conception. Because up to 85% of conceptions don't stick to the uterine wall. 85%. That means only 15% of life begins at conception. That, is why pro-choicers have SCIENCE on their side. Even scientists don't agree that life begins at conception, partly because most fertilised eggs don't even implant, but because the fetus is not sentient until week 26/27, scientists say when the fetus has sentience and a brain stem and nervous system, which is not until the THIRD TRIMESTER.

hplusbiopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/inconsistancy-in-the-life-begins-at-conception-argument

1. It is an indisputable fact that human life begins at fertilization. It's not only in every primary reputable source on the topic (that I've cited)... it's common sense. If it's not alive, that's called a miscarriage. If it's not human? It's not pregnancy. Humans can only reproduce other humans.

The arguments against abortion have always been rooted in science. The pro abortion argument has always been rooted in the philosophical concept of personhood, which yes....makes it comparable to the arguments used for chattel slavery and the holocaust. Once a group of humans is labeled "nonpersons", human rights abuses follow

2. I really resent.....and so do many other women....the whole idea that our bodies are slavery. And that women are so dumb and incapable that they cant be held responsible for their bodies.

Not being allowed to kill my child doesnt mean I'm forced to be a mother. Same applies here. No one is arguing for forcing women to have sex and get pregnant. We all know the natural consequence of sex is pregnancy. We have a plethora of ways to avoid it ....and knowledge that some methods can fail.

The last I checked, sex isnt a right. No one is entitled to have sex. It is a responsibility. Anything a person chooses to do with their body they should do responsibly. What IS a right and entitlement is the human right to life. This is the fundamental RIGHT from which we have every other right.

People who argue "gestational slavery" have bought into a misogynistic view of women, that we should strive to the biological normative of MEN. That the most unique,, powerful gift we have.. to nurture and bring forth human life, is a BURDEN (for men mostly) and a curse that makes us "slaves". Also that women are weak and incapable. Abortion enslaves women to standards more suited to men, enslaves us to expectations to be more like men, and pits women against their own bodies and their own offspring.

It benefits men. Men who want to use women for sex and avoid the responsibility of having another human life to take their money and time. People who use the "gestational slavery" are delusional thinking men WANT to get women pregnant and somehow "enslave" them. Its complete hogwash, and as most post abortive women will tell you, most of the time they aborted due to lack of support from the father. MEN are the ones who want abortion.

And employers dont have to support women as women. They can give you shitty benefits and even find ways to fire women if they become pregnant. Because they see it as some "choice" you made to stay pregnant so why should they have to offer maternal benefits? The whole idea that women should have abortions if they want to succeed in the work force is also misogynistic bullshit.

As we advance in our knowledge of human life in the womb, our views should be altered to recognize that knowledge. We should be genuinely progressing into a more supportive society for women and families. Not ignoring reality and ignoring the pain, suffer and grief caused by this.

Society has just become MORE heartless. More self centered. More dismissive of human life. And suffering is used to promote partisan politics. The narrative around abortion hurts women. It degrades their loss, whether they miscarried or went through an abortion.....saying that humans in utero are not humans or a life is wrong and damaging.

I can absolutely cite facts on this from reputable sources. I can show videos taken of abortion providers laughing about eyeballs falling on their lap and how hard they have to pull to rip limbs of because these humans struggle while they are being inhumanely murdered. I can show images of the after math of abortion and countless posts from suffering women that show this conversation is FAR from over, VERY nessesary and not a fight that's going to end.

 

[Dove]

How about making it easier to adopt, for starters.

Because paedophiles adopt children. My son met a girl with Cystic fibrosis. She was adopted from a Romanian orphanage by an English couple and brought to Australia. She was sexually abused by the beast who adopted her. It went to court and the old beast had to pay her 10s of thousands of dollars in compensation. The girl was a talented concert pianist as well.

Adoption is just child trafficking... You're better off dead than be diddled and having a lifetime of being torn between becoming a serial killer or suiciding...

Real life isn't like what the movies portray about how wonderful being adopted is.

Yes, there are indeed success stories but they are far less common than you think.

There are more stable couples who have been waiting for years to adopt than there are babies aborted each year.

There are so many people who have wonderful adoptive families.

Yeah sometimes people abuse children. Many of those children grow up and have struggles but are still grateful to be alive.

If abortion was off the table? The amount of accidental pregnancies would significantly drop. People would be much more careful knowing they didnt have an escape hatch. Men would be getting sterilized to avoid fathering a child they dont want. As it stands he knows he can lay the physical suffering and upheaval on the woman.

I've been having this debate a lot over the past 15 years. I'm sitting in the doctors office waiting on my mother. Im passionate about this but I really dont have the mental/emotional energy for today so I'm already spent.

I hope my points will considered because it's not about winning an arguement. It's about human rights and who we want to be and compassion and mercy for the weakest of us.

They always say you can tell a lot about society by how they treat the helpless. The smallest. The oldest. Animals. Et. I see that is so true even as our attitudes towards life bleed into everything and we become a very cruel dismissive world.

 

[Omnipotent]

They're in it for the money. They get paid to foster children. That's the fosterers, not adopters.

I'm not going to debate it.

As Salem said, abortion rights are UN human rights so I'm pretty sure Texas is contravening UN laws on human rights.

Abortion is legal in Australia and has been for decades and it'll never be reversed.

 

[Omnipotent]

We've had TV shows where children are looking for parents and parents have been looking for children they were forced to give up and there are NO happy endings.

Everyone was psychologically wounded DEEPLY...

 

[Blazor]

How about making it easier to adopt, for starters.

Because paedophiles adopt children.

Its more rich people that are peds than poor people. So your point is moot.

And Dove is right, a lot of parents get their kids ripped from them for petty shit, to go into foster care.

My one friend's kids went through that crap, and the kid's adopted parents raised them really well.

 

[Lokmar]

Most of this could have been avoided if libs would have just agreed to limit abortion to the first trimester. However, they wanna murder the kid when he's practically big enough to walk himself down to the bus stop. All the pics of kids 5 months old and more ripped apart and dropped in a bucket is repulsive.

Now this is just plain wrong: "scientists say when the fetus has sentience and a brain stem and nervous system, which is not until the THIRD TRIMESTER."

Kids are born all the time at 5-6 months and survive. Thats the second tri.

 

[Omnipotent]

Its more rich people that are peds than poor people. So your point is moot.

be quite... you sound silly.

Most of this could have been avoided if libs would have just agreed to limit abortion to the first trimester. However, they wanna murder the kid when he's practically big enough to walk himself down to the bus stop. All the pics of kids 5 months old and more ripped apart and dropped in a bucket is repulsive.

Now this is just plain wrong: "scientists say when the fetus has sentience and a brain stem and nervous system, which is not until the THIRD TRIMESTER."

Kids are born all the time at 5-6 months and survive. Thats the second tri.

Who the hell gets abortions in the third trimester? I have never heard of it unless the poor baby died in the womb and the poor mother needs specialist care...

In Australia, that dead baby would be delivered... The mother induced, go through proper labour and deliver the dead baby NOT pulled to pieces. It happened to one of my fb friends. His daughter had to deliver a dead baby. What sort of freaks are you people, seriously!~

You men need to stay out women's business... you don't know what the fuck you're talking about!~

 

[Admin.]

Do what I say, not what I do.

 

[Admin.]

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Texas is going to exterminate lib cunts who kill lib sprogs?

Texas is awesome!

 

[Lokmar]

Its more rich people that are peds than poor people. So your point is moot.

be quite... you sound silly.

Most of this could have been avoided if libs would have just agreed to limit abortion to the first trimester. However, they wanna murder the kid when he's practically big enough to walk himself down to the bus stop. All the pics of kids 5 months old and more ripped apart and dropped in a bucket is repulsive.

Now this is just plain wrong: "scientists say when the fetus has sentience and a brain stem and nervous system, which is not until the THIRD TRIMESTER."

Kids are born all the time at 5-6 months and survive. Thats the second tri.

Who the hell gets abortions in the third trimester? I have never heard of it unless the poor baby died in the womb and the poor mother needs specialist care...

In Australia, that dead baby would be delivered... The mother induced, go through proper labour and deliver the dead baby NOT pulled to pieces. It happened to one of my fb friends. His daughter had to deliver a dead baby. What sort of freaks are you people, seriously!~

You men need to stay out women's business... you don't know what the fuck you're talking about!~

They get 2nd and 3rd tri abortiona all the time here. Sure, they said they didnt for years and then they got caught. As far as men staying out of it, I'm not about to stay out of women murdering viable human beings. Its 1000% my business.

 

[Lokmar]

Do what I say, not what I do.

God wants faggits dead so you should be dead already. Ergo, your opinion doesnt matter.

 

[Lokmar]

Any cunt that has her 5 or 6 month old baby ripped apart should be burned at the stake. I'll fukin volunteer to carry out the sentence.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

You know what the really good news is here?

The liberal leftist vermin scum cunts will be moving out of Texas leaving mostly the good conservatives who vote Red.

master stroke of genius.

Californian's? Get the fuck out. Find another blue state to infect with your mental illness