Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

 

[Holliday1881]

1964 - Democratic Senate, House and President.
(Small minds should not read this. It will cause great perturbation and upheaval in your wee beans. Conservatives, this means you)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

 

[Dove]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

By chose her course you mean teens who are forced by parents to abort(happens all the time), or most of the women who are coerced and pressured by men(happens every fucking day), making a choice based on bad and glossed over information about life in the womb and risk or because she doesnt know what's available to help her?

So set it up where the information she has access too is intended to influence her to abort?

Yeah no. Here is the issue. The government ONLY exists to preserve our human and constitutional rights. It is NOT there to grant or remove them.

So when the government decides it's okay to kill "non person humans" and there is huge billion dollar industry that buys politicains and has NO accountability or even basic oversight and preys on the vulnerable to kill the most vulnerable.....that is a human rights crisis.

Only authoritarians think its okay to remove rights from human beings based on arbitrary standards of "person hood"

Saying that we are contradicting our classic liberal stance because we recognize one humans rights end where another's begin, just shows kinda more about your very surface and ....authoritarian....mindset.

I also agree with laws against killing infants, children, so on. That isnt authoritarian. Not being allowed to kill isnt authoritarian. The only here with contradictions would be YOU. Again, people defended slavery by saying the same stupid shit.

You cannot support abortion and also think you support rights. Human beings either have intrinsic value or they dont. Our most fundamental right....to be ALIVE, is the foundation of all other rights.

And anyone who views a human being as property, disposable property, at ANY stage of human life....is NO respecter or support of true liberty in any consistent manner.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

 

[Holliday1881]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

Faulty facts and reasoning ^^^

Dismissed...

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

 

[Dove]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

Yeah but this isnt true. A baby is a term of endearment and you people cant tell women what a baby is. Each of mine were my babies.

And women are pregnant with living human beings. At each stage that is a HUMAN being.

And this is part of what I mean. There is no freedom of fucking choice when you are not given correct factual information on which to make a free choice, are you?

You guys tell women this shit so she makes YOUR choice.

Its 2021. We have made leaps in scientific progress. Medical science progress. We KNOW that is a distinct and unique living human being at every stage.

You guys are stuck in a dark age, dishonest mentality in order to justify violence. H....join the fucking present day.

The future is "get your ideology off of my biology".

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

 

[Dove]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

Faulty facts and reasoning ^^^

Dismissed...

It's like they just want to ignore science and medical science as it suits their stupid politics.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

Faulty facts and reasoning ^^^

Dismissed...

It's like they just want to ignore science and medical science as it suits their stupid politics.

They love killing babies!

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

 

[Dove]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Funny how they rag about the future but when progress knocks they act like cavemen.

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

Harry, just if you don't mind my dispelling your delusion - a baby is a self supporting life outside the womb,
defined as a small child - not a zygote, embryo, or fetus.

But remember, Popgun, if you want to work to extremes that
..every sperm is sacred so when you spill your seed you are killing untold numbers of babies.

Faulty facts and reasoning ^^^

Dismissed...

It's like they just want to ignore science and medical science as it suits their stupid politics.

It's not because of politics. It's because of individual liberty.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

You lost at least 20 posts ago.

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

You lost at least 20 posts ago.

What did I lose? Did you eat it, Yeast Beast?