MasterBlaster
Rest In Peace Boyd
- Reaction score
- 488
- Location
- Bayou counrty
LOVE repping you, bro! You deserve it!
"The term “unwinnable war” is a strange and ambiguous notion used most often to describe fake reasoning for not winning a war. This seems absurd to me, and at the same time insincere. Lately, I have heard this term used often in personal correspondence sent to me, and in the published writings of others concerning past wars. Mainly ex-soldiers, politicians, and other purveyors of war use this term in order to shield themselves from the shame of losing. But was the real intent ever to win?
After the fact, the unwinnable war theory always seems to surface, as if war should not be fought if it is unwinnable. Does this mean that war is just a game? Do the U.S. and its military enter each aggression with the question, is this winnable? If so, is this the criteria considered, or is the opposite effect actually pursued?"
Source:
"The indifference concerning war in this country is a double-edged sword. While ignoring the horrors of U.S. foreign policy is the easy way out, especially when that indifference can be shielded from scrutiny behind the shadow of false patriotism, it does not erase guilt by involvement. No war can be sustained by the state unless consent of the people is given, regardless whether it is informed or implied. Blood is not just on the hands of soldiers hired to murder for the state, it is also on the hands of the people who do nothing to stop it."
Source:
"The indifference concerning war in this country is a double-edged sword. While ignoring the horrors of U.S. foreign policy is the easy way out, especially when that indifference can be shielded from scrutiny behind the shadow of false patriotism, it does not erase guilt by involvement. No war can be sustained by the state unless consent of the people is given, regardless whether it is informed or implied. Blood is not just on the hands of soldiers hired to murder for the state, it is also on the hands of the people who do nothing to stop it."
Source:
Alright Hazypoo you little grunt you.
It is about this time I point out that a picture of troops paused at a poppyfield does not mean they are guarding it... looks to me that they may be conferring while out on patrol of a vast stretch hostile land in a place they'd rather not be surrounded by people who'd rather not see them there.
I am curious as to exactly the point of this thread, other than to irk certain quarters into responding in the most colourful manner possible. By posting such blatant propaganda are you not employing the very same tactics as the forces you propose to deride? Now if you could offer some actual aerial over head shots of such deployment with the exclusive purpose of guarding a poppy field, yes yes, let us gather the pitchforks and holler.
"The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war."
- Douglas MacArthur
My guess is they are waiting on the guys with the flame throwers- - - - - - - -
PS- I wonder what KW would do if we got invaded by aliens from another world,who would he call or would he just join them- - - - - - -
I'm 99.99% certain you jokers don't belong to the wealthy, ruling class.
I'm 99.99% certain you jokers don't belong to the wealthy, ruling class.