21 "juveniles" arrested after attack on bus driver

DDT

Reaction score
920
Location
Sotsialisticheskaya Respublika Kanada
Do me a favor. Go to the FBI site and find that table you posted in that meme. Post the link here.
It seems that you cannot handle the truths of the real data!




1592369735258.jpg
 

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
^^Peaches is exactly like Aidsman in regards to his refusal to ever be critical of black people.

His insatiable lust for black cawk has lead to him fetichizing black teens and caused his virtue signalling to reach truly absurd levels.

In the eyes of elderly liberal homosexuals like those 2, black yoofs can literally do no wrong.


You are totally ful of shit, laddie. If you imagine your conclusion can be drawn by a sane person from the post you quoted, it proves nothing except that you can't read. And as well, you have no clue what "fallout" I'm even talking about since you clearly know very little about US history.

Ask a third party whether my post is non-critical of black yoofs.
 
Last edited:

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.
 

DDT

Reaction score
920
Location
Sotsialisticheskaya Respublika Kanada
Yeah. That's what I thought. I went to that FBI site, and I can't find the data that that phoney ass meme claims is from there.
It's there if you look. You'll also find that Blacks commit 52.6% of the murders in the US, despite being only 13% of the population. That's on the FBI stats page also. They do mostly kill their own, however.
 

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
9,766
Location
Portugal
Yeah. That's what I thought. I went to that FBI site, and I can't find the data that that phoney ass meme claims is from there.
It's there if you look. You'll also find that Blacks commit 52.6% of the murders in the US, despite being only 13% of the population. That's on the FBI stats page also. They do mostly kill their own, however.

Where? I looked.
 
Reaction score
7,487
Yeah. That's what I thought. I went to that FBI site, and I can't find the data that that phoney ass meme claims is from there.
It's there if you look. You'll also find that Blacks commit 52.6% of the murders in the US, despite being only 13% of the population. That's on the FBI stats page also. They do mostly kill their own, however.

It is even worse as we are really only talking about black males between 15-45. So maybe 4% of the population commit the majority of all murders in the country. This is why it is idiocy when leftists say "the law is racist and that is why so many young black males are in prison!" No, they got convicted and imprisoned at exactly the levels their crime rate would suggest. "Deperate impact" is just a lie racist leftists tell to other low I.Q. leftists.
 

DDT

Reaction score
920
Location
Sotsialisticheskaya Respublika Kanada
It is even worse as we are really only talking about black males between 15-45. So maybe 4% of the population commit the majority of all murders in the country. This is why it is idiocy when leftists say "the law is racist and that is why so many young black males are in prison!" No, they got convicted and imprisoned at exactly the levels their crime rate would suggest. "Deperate impact" is just a lie racist leftists tell to other low I.Q. leftists.
It's the same with Blacks and Injuns here. They aren't over-represented in prison because of racism. They simply commit more crime than Whites do. It's what happens when one embraces the "thug life".
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.

Regardless, the statement rings with truth. It has nothing to do with "better Dems" and everything to do with Leftist/Registered Democrat filth policy that was/is/and always will be only interested in securing political power.

Leftists (i.e. Registered Democrats) are all power whore filth -- every last registered Democrat one of them.

LBJ's policies destroyed much of the black family structure (we now see 70%+ illegitimacy rates for all black children born in the US) and basically re-enslaved millions of black people by creating a culture government dependency. But any least the vile and filthy Registered Democrat scum have a secure and taxpayer-funded voting bloc. That's all you disgusting Democrat filth ever cared about.

And it's more than 3 or 4 generations. We are now up to 9 or ten generations of total government dependency for millions of urban negroes across the USA (if for no other reason than negroes tend to breed quite early).
 
Reaction score
7,487
I suppose this thread is q good place for this as it is discussing the lefts soft on crime policies.

 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
This is just sad. Poverty sucks the soul. And racism does the same. One additional thing that might also be a problem: young people with no life experience and no chances to get out of the hell they were born into having children. Yes, abortion needs to remain safe and legal as a way to help young people escape the cycle of poverty.
WTF does this have to do with poverty and racism, cunt?
 

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.

Regardless, the statement rings with truth. It has nothing to do with "better Dems" and everything to do with Leftist/Registered Democrat filth policy that was/is/and always will be only interested in securing political power.

Leftists (i.e. Registered Democrats) are all power whore filth -- every last registered Democrat one of them.

LBJ's policies destroyed much of the black family structure (we now see 70%+ illegitimacy rates for all black children born in the US) and basically re-enslaved millions of black people by creating a culture government dependency. But any least the vile and filthy Registered Democrat scum have a secure and taxpayer-funded voting bloc. That's all you disgusting Democrat filth ever cared about.

And it's more than 3 or 4 generations. We are now up to 9 or ten generations of total government dependency for millions of urban negroes across the USA (if for no other reason than negroes tend to breed quite early).


Looks like our brief moment of amity was short-lived.

Let me just ask you three questions.

1/ Is there a single sentence in your post (aside from the first one) that is both grammatically correct and also expresses a thought that you actually think I might agree with?

2/ How many years do you imagine are included in the "9 or 10 generations" to which you refer?

3/ Are you drunk?
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,125
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.

Regardless, the statement rings with truth. It has nothing to do with "better Dems" and everything to do with Leftist/Registered Democrat filth policy that was/is/and always will be only interested in securing political power.

Leftists (i.e. Registered Democrats) are all power whore filth -- every last registered Democrat one of them.

LBJ's policies destroyed much of the black family structure (we now see 70%+ illegitimacy rates for all black children born in the US) and basically re-enslaved millions of black people by creating a culture government dependency. But any least the vile and filthy Registered Democrat scum have a secure and taxpayer-funded voting bloc. That's all you disgusting Democrat filth ever cared about.

And it's more than 3 or 4 generations. We are now up to 9 or ten generations of total government dependency for millions of urban negroes across the USA (if for no other reason than negroes tend to breed quite early).


Looks like our brief moment of amity was short-lived.

Let me just ask you three questions.

1/ Is there a single sentence in your post (aside from the first one) that is both grammatically correct and also expresses a thought that you actually think I might agree with?

2/ How many years do you imagine are included in the "9 or 10 generations" to which you refer?

3/ Are you drunk?
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.

Regardless, the statement rings with truth. It has nothing to do with "better Dems" and everything to do with Leftist/Registered Democrat filth policy that was/is/and always will be only interested in securing political power.

Leftists (i.e. Registered Democrats) are all power whore filth -- every last registered Democrat one of them.

LBJ's policies destroyed much of the black family structure (we now see 70%+ illegitimacy rates for all black children born in the US) and basically re-enslaved millions of black people by creating a culture government dependency. But any least the vile and filthy Registered Democrat scum have a secure and taxpayer-funded voting bloc. That's all you disgusting Democrat filth ever cared about.

And it's more than 3 or 4 generations. We are now up to 9 or ten generations of total government dependency for millions of urban negroes across the USA (if for no other reason than negroes tend to breed quite early).


Looks like our brief moment of amity was short-lived.

Let me just ask you three questions.

1/ Is there a single sentence in your post (aside from the first one) that is both grammatically correct and also expresses a thought that you actually think I might agree with?

2/ How many years do you imagine are included in the "9 or 10 generations" to which you refer?

3/ Are you drunk?
Let me ask you just one question

can you smell your own bullshit without a nose?
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
No, it's more like the political fallout from NOT listening to Goldwater but instead, opening the checkbook for LBJ's totally unrealistic Great Society plan. 3 or 4 generations later, this is the Great Society we bought.


Totally Paleo! 10 points to Spoon!
I'm afraid Spoon wouldn't go quite that far. Like a lot of Old Lefties, he thinks LBJ's course would have served the country better if he'd had better Dems in congress to set it up the way he wanted it.

As if it was EVER possible to get "better" Dems OR Repugs in the congress.

Regardless, the statement rings with truth. It has nothing to do with "better Dems" and everything to do with Leftist/Registered Democrat filth policy that was/is/and always will be only interested in securing political power.

Leftists (i.e. Registered Democrats) are all power whore filth -- every last registered Democrat one of them.

LBJ's policies destroyed much of the black family structure (we now see 70%+ illegitimacy rates for all black children born in the US) and basically re-enslaved millions of black people by creating a culture government dependency. But any least the vile and filthy Registered Democrat scum have a secure and taxpayer-funded voting bloc. That's all you disgusting Democrat filth ever cared about.

And it's more than 3 or 4 generations. We are now up to 9 or ten generations of total government dependency for millions of urban negroes across the USA (if for no other reason than negroes tend to breed quite early).


Looks like our brief moment of amity was short-lived.

Let me just ask you three questions.

1/ Is there a single sentence in your post (aside from the first one) that is both grammatically correct and also expresses a thought that you actually think I might agree with?

2/ How many years do you imagine are included in the "9 or 10 generations" to which you refer?

3/ Are you drunk?


Sorry. It's just that your lucid statements are so few and far between.

1) Why on earth would I want to express a thought I think you might agree with? That would violate every standard of the game.

2) I have first-hand anecdotal evidence -- from my own mom (gods rest her soul) who worked for the State of Illinois -- of negro women who were into their 4th and 5th generation of welfare dependency. And this was back in late 1980s and early 1990s.

Do I really need to provide you an algorithm to draw out the generational inference to 2021?

3) Not completely.
 

Seamajor

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,419

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
(sloshing of pails of Reggie's water, unsolicited)
Let me ask you just one question

can you smell your own bullshit without a nose?

I don't know, since much like others here I have a non-detachable nose. But it works fine, and I only smell bullshit when I see your avatar.
Be grateful I answered your question, since you've yet to answer any of mine, meat head.



Sorry. It's just that your lucid statements are so few and far between.

1) Why on earth would I want to express a thought I think you might agree with? That would violate every standard of the game.

2) I have first-hand anecdotal evidence -- from my own mom (gods rest her soul) who worked for the State of Illinois -- of negro women who were into their 4th and 5th generation of welfare dependency. And this was back in late 1980s and early 1990s.

Do I really need to provide you an algorithm to draw out the generational inference to 2021?

3) Not completely.

1/ Okay then, it was a shitpost and not a serious conversational effort. Thanks.

2/ So, either the welfare state existed long before the civil rights era, perhaps even before WW2, or "negro women" found a way to reproduce at age five? That's what I'm trying to understand here, and I'm still not getting it.

3/ Only in this context would I EVER ask anyone such a question... what about your sainted mom, was she drunk too?
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
(sloshing of pails of Reggie's water, unsolicited)
Let me ask you just one question

can you smell your own bullshit without a nose?

I don't know, since much like others here I have a non-detachable nose. But it works fine, and I only smell bullshit when I see your avatar.
Be grateful I answered your question, since you've yet to answer any of mine, meat head.



Sorry. It's just that your lucid statements are so few and far between.

1) Why on earth would I want to express a thought I think you might agree with? That would violate every standard of the game.

2) I have first-hand anecdotal evidence -- from my own mom (gods rest her soul) who worked for the State of Illinois -- of negro women who were into their 4th and 5th generation of welfare dependency. And this was back in late 1980s and early 1990s.

Do I really need to provide you an algorithm to draw out the generational inference to 2021?

3) Not completely.

1/ Okay then, it was a shitpost and not a serious conversational effort. Thanks.

2/ So, either the welfare state existed long before the civil rights era, perhaps even before WW2, or "negro women" found a way to reproduce at age five? That's what I'm trying to understand here, and I'm still not getting it.

3/ Only in this context would I EVER ask anyone such a question... what about your sainted mom, was she drunk too?


1) No. I was just surprised at you admitting the utter failure of LBJs disgusting Great Society boondoggle that's done nothing but destroy a large segment of the American black population by placing them in dependency plantations to, in LBJs own words, "keep the niggers voting Democrat for a hundred years."

2) Also, one of the many social pathologies that plague the Democrat-created plantation culture of multi-generational welfare negroes is the problem of young black girls getting knocked up at extremely young ages. I personally know a black woman who had her first pregnancy at 13. At 14 she had her first child and got her very first welfare check of her very own. She subsequently had five more children (Don't ask about the fathers. I did and got laughed at.) and got a bigger welfare check with each one of them. When I knew her, her first child, a girl, was pregnant at 14.

3) Well, my Scot and Irish does come from the distaff side, so, yes, probably.
 

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
1/ Yeah, the reason I said it was a shitpost was because you would jump on a major policy agreement and trowel a couple of bags of your own colorful narrative on top of it while pretending I agreed with you in all particulars -- despite my not having said so. But of course, you probably knew that.

2/ I note that in the Ozarks, where I grew up, the "generational age" for white trash girls is closer to SIXteen because they prefer to have their first baby during the summer after junior year so as to be able to still graduate with their class. Those are the more ambitious ones, of course. Those who've chosen to participate in the "multiple children in the system" game are less fussy about the timing of their first baby. I've never looked for statistics regarding possible racial differences in the behavior of trashy girls, but it might be interesting I suppose. I don't like to imagine people like you and I could ever disagree on the definition of so fundamental a word as TRASHY, but I'll bet we do disagree since for you it seems to have racial connotations.
It's how we get Congress Members like Lauren Bobert and Devin Nunes and that crazy blonde from GA, I disremember her name.

3/ You and I both have UK as well as Teutonic and Scandihoovian ancestry, so naturally we both grew up in families where some of the adults were... let's say, intemperate.
 
Last edited:

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
Surely you're not jealous or attention-starved just cause Gurkie and I are chatting about politics?

Don't cry Stubby, I'm sure you'll always be his bestie.
 

Biggie Smiles

I make libturds berry angry. I do!!!
Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,125
Surely you're not jealous or attention-starved just cause Gurkie and I are chatting about politics?

Don't cry Stubby, I'm sure you'll always be his bestie.
Most surely I am not. I just think you are boring, clueless and disgusting looking

carry on
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
1/ Yeah, the reason I said it was a shitpost was because you would jump on a major policy agreement and trowel a couple of bags of your own colorful narrative on top of it while pretending I agreed with you in all particulars -- despite my not having said so. But of course, you probably knew that.

2/ I note that in the Ozarks, where I grew up, the "generational age" for white trash girls is closer to SIXteen because they prefer to have their first baby during the summer after junior year so as to be able to still graduate with their class. Those are the more ambitious ones, of course. Those who've chosen to participate in the "multiple children in the system" game are less fussy about the timing of their first baby. I've never looked for statistics regarding possible racial differences in the behavior of trashy girls, but it might be interesting I suppose. I don't like to imagine people like you and I could ever disagree on the definition of so fundamental a word as TRASHY, but I'll bet we do disagree since for you it seems to have racial connotations.
It's how we get Congress Members like Lauren Bobert and Devin Nunes and that crazy blonde from GA, I disremember her name.

3/ You and I both have UK as well as Teutonic and Scandihoovian ancestry, so naturally we both grew up in families where some of the adults were... let's say, intemperate.


1) Yes, but the colorful language was a direct quote from LBJ.

2) The discussion was about the social pathologies within the black urban communities across the nation caused by failed Democrat policies. We can talk about white trash whose lives and communities have ben fuckedup by Democrat policies if you wish.

3) Most of the adults in my family would agree that temperance is for pussies.