- Reaction score
- 1,174
- Location
- Shangri-la
But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
You know what else? Why do so many guys choose beard styles that make their mouths look like pussies?But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
Ohh, I have wondered about that, but that does explain Don Jr's recent adaptation of "The Muff"You know what else? Why do so many guys choose beard styles that make their mouths look like pussies?But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
Strange sort of invitational display, no? Seems to be a favorite among trumptards.
You know what else? Why do so many guys choose beard styles that make their mouths look like pussies?But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
Strange sort of invitational display, no? Seems to be a favorite among trumptards.
Are we to assume, you do not have the same reaction?You know what else? Why do so many guys choose beard styles that make their mouths look like pussies?But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
Strange sort of invitational display, no? Seems to be a favorite among trumptards.
Again this is 2022. Women have been shaving since the 80s.
Js.
And.....wow. So you see men with beards and its looks like an invite for your dick?
"Today, we know that genitalia do far more than just fit together mechanically. They can also signal, symbolize and titillate—not just to a potential mate, but to other members of a group. In humans, dolphins and beyond, sexual behavior can be used to strengthen friendships and alliances, make gestures of dominance and submission, and as part of social negotiations like reconciliation and peacemaking, points out evolutionary biologist Joan Roughgarden, author of the 2004 book ."
Yeah that was interesting until it got politcal and I remembered this was from Smithsonian.
We know where this is going.
We havent cheapened human sexuality quite enough. Get over those archaic monogamous relationships and go finger bang your friends to strengthen your friendships lol. Right.
Again this is 2022. Women have been shaving since the 80s.
Are we to assume, you do not have the same reaction?You know what else? Why do so many guys choose beard styles that make their mouths look like pussies?But Ruby Red lips are so lovely and naturalistic looking?I had read about the ducks some years ago but the rest is very interesting as well.
Strange sort of invitational display, no? Seems to be a favorite among trumptards.
Again this is 2022. Women have been shaving since the 80s.
Js.
And.....wow. So you see men with beards and its looks like an invite for your dick?
"Today, we know that genitalia do far more than just fit together mechanically. They can also signal, symbolize and titillate—not just to a potential mate, but to other members of a group. In humans, dolphins and beyond, sexual behavior can be used to strengthen friendships and alliances, make gestures of dominance and submission, and as part of social negotiations like reconciliation and peacemaking, points out evolutionary biologist Joan Roughgarden, author of the 2004 book ."
Yeah that was interesting until it got politcal and I remembered this was from Smithsonian.
We know where this is going.
We havent cheapened human sexuality quite enough. Get over those archaic monogamous relationships and go finger bang your friends to strengthen your friendships lol. Right.
Sorry, did I speak to you, or look at you, or encourage you to address me in any format?
It's always creepy when animals are called upon to argue for sexual behaviour of humans. As if animals are doing it.....it is natural for us to do it.
This idea was included in this article as well.....even though it was talking about how duck vaginas are made to prevent sperm from "forced mating" from being fertilized in the female.
Animals of all kinds will "force mate" other animals. So that's clearly very natural. We could use the same logic to argue that rape is natural and normal because animals do it.....you dont see that, but we could.
People take what they like and want to believe and find all kinds of ways to "justify" it, even though they dont need to. The "gay animal" shit is the worst. Yeah you will animals humping eachother.....it usually has to do with dominance, not "sexuality". And that same animal who humps the same sex will turn around and mate with the opposite sex. So... it's a stupid fucking argument.
Humans are far different in other animals on the planet. We are able to contemplate our own existence and make choices beyond what our animal urges tell us. We dont eat our own puke either. There are a lot of things done by animals that humans do not do.
This article of course has to make it seem like marriage/family and monogamy isnt natural and sex should just be this cheap thing a people just do with anyone for any reason. Like we dont have decades of data showing that children do way better in stable two parent homes and the family structure is the most important foundation on society. Nope. Let's "liberate" ourselves and enter into hedonistic slavery and let it fall like Rome.
Why do these people think "sexual liberation" (basically rutting like animals with no standards or any moral limits) is some progressive future thing? Even they point out humans did this kind of thing years ago through history. We are going BACKWARDS, not forward. Let's dehumanize sex and call it liberation and view other humans as pleasure objects. This is why societies fell in the past....let's do it again.
People need to go read all the academia about this. Look into Queer theory. Just the actual writings and "research". You'll see how the "innocent child" is regarded as oppression of childhood sexuality(yes....childhood sexuality) and how the adult/child binary is also regarded as a form of "oppression". So there is literature and ground work for making the MAP(pedophile) arguments on an academic level.
This is where we get things like "culturally relevant", "SEL(socail emotional learning)" from. Things in public schools right now that mesh this critical theory and queer theory shit into public school curriculums. This is why the FL bill is being attacked and lied about.
It's all sick and preverse and intended to dismantle the family structure. Teaching kids to be "fluid" and not have a solid identity.
It's always creepy when animals are called upon to argue for sexual behaviour of humans. As if animals are doing it.....it is natural for us to do it.
This idea was included in this article as well.....even though it was talking about how duck vaginas are made to prevent sperm from "forced mating" from being fertilized in the female.
Animals of all kinds will "force mate" other animals. So that's clearly very natural. We could use the same logic to argue that rape is natural and normal because animals do it.....you dont see that, but we could.
People take what they like and want to believe and find all kinds of ways to "justify" it, even though they dont need to. The "gay animal" shit is the worst. Yeah you will animals humping eachother.....it usually has to do with dominance, not "sexuality". And that same animal who humps the same sex will turn around and mate with the opposite sex. So... it's a stupid fucking argument.
Humans are far different in other animals on the planet. We are able to contemplate our own existence and make choices beyond what our animal urges tell us. We dont eat our own puke either. There are a lot of things done by animals that humans do not do.
This article of course has to make it seem like marriage/family and monogamy isnt natural and sex should just be this cheap thing a people just do with anyone for any reason. Like we dont have decades of data showing that children do way better in stable two parent homes and the family structure is the most important foundation on society. Nope. Let's "liberate" ourselves and enter into hedonistic slavery and let it fall like Rome.
Why do these people think "sexual liberation" (basically rutting like animals with no standards or any moral limits) is some progressive future thing? Even they point out humans did this kind of thing years ago through history. We are going BACKWARDS, not forward. Let's dehumanize sex and call it liberation and view other humans as pleasure objects. This is why societies fell in the past....let's do it again.
People need to go read all the academia about this. Look into Queer theory. Just the actual writings and "research". You'll see how the "innocent child" is regarded as oppression of childhood sexuality(yes....childhood sexuality) and how the adult/child binary is also regarded as a form of "oppression". So there is literature and ground work for making the MAP(pedophile) arguments on an academic level.
This is where we get things like "culturally relevant", "SEL(socail emotional learning)" from. Things in public schools right now that mesh this critical theory and queer theory shit into public school curriculums. This is why the FL bill is being attacked and lied about.
It's all sick and preverse and intended to dismantle the family structure. Teaching kids to be "fluid" and not have a solid identity.
Well @Dove I knew a real life situation where this guy couldn't control his Lust full urges. He drank to excess (barrelwash), used hookers, young girls, contracted VD & had several illegitimate children. Well 1 day he knocked up a young woman when he was 62. Eventually he got hepatitis C, cirrhosis of the liver, an assortment of other venereal diseases & had to get a trichotomy & he died at 67.
Neveremind killing a civilization uncontrolled sexual urges can be a destructive force. Can destroy a person too, eh.
Libs think 5 year olds are hawt.
It's always creepy when animals are called upon to argue for sexual behaviour of humans. As if animals are doing it.....it is natural for us to do it.
This idea was included in this article as well.....even though it was talking about how duck vaginas are made to prevent sperm from "forced mating" from being fertilized in the female.
Animals of all kinds will "force mate" other animals. So that's clearly very natural. We could use the same logic to argue that rape is natural and normal because animals do it.....you dont see that, but we could.
People take what they like and want to believe and find all kinds of ways to "justify" it, even though they dont need to. The "gay animal" shit is the worst. Yeah you will animals humping eachother.....it usually has to do with dominance, not "sexuality". And that same animal who humps the same sex will turn around and mate with the opposite sex. So... it's a stupid fucking argument.
Humans are far different in other animals on the planet. We are able to contemplate our own existence and make choices beyond what our animal urges tell us. We dont eat our own puke either. There are a lot of things done by animals that humans do not do.
This article of course has to make it seem like marriage/family and monogamy isnt natural and sex should just be this cheap thing a people just do with anyone for any reason. Like we dont have decades of data showing that children do way better in stable two parent homes and the family structure is the most important foundation on society. Nope. Let's "liberate" ourselves and enter into hedonistic slavery and let it fall like Rome.
Why do these people think "sexual liberation" (basically rutting like animals with no standards or any moral limits) is some progressive future thing? Even they point out humans did this kind of thing years ago through history. We are going BACKWARDS, not forward. Let's dehumanize sex and call it liberation and view other humans as pleasure objects. This is why societies fell in the past....let's do it again.
People need to go read all the academia about this. Look into Queer theory. Just the actual writings and "research". You'll see how the "innocent child" is regarded as oppression of childhood sexuality(yes....childhood sexuality) and how the adult/child binary is also regarded as a form of "oppression". So there is literature and ground work for making the MAP(pedophile) arguments on an academic level.
This is where we get things like "culturally relevant", "SEL(socail emotional learning)" from. Things in public schools right now that mesh this critical theory and queer theory shit into public school curriculums. This is why the FL bill is being attacked and lied about.
It's all sick and preverse and intended to dismantle the family structure. Teaching kids to be "fluid" and not have a solid identity.
Well @Dove I knew a real life situation where this guy couldn't control his Lust full urges. He drank to excess (barrelwash), used hookers, young girls, contracted VD & had several illegitimate children. Well 1 day he knocked up a young woman when he was 62. Eventually he got hepatitis C, cirrhosis of the liver, an assortment of other venereal diseases & had to get a trichotomy & he died at 67.
Neveremind killing a civilization uncontrolled sexual urges can be a destructive force. Can destroy a person too, eh.
Absolutely.
I dont know of any promiscuous people who are happy and well adjusted. I dont.
No matter how much people want to argue for a sexual free for all.....its not natural or good for human beings. You can see this with the depression and STI rates.
Its discussed as if we should all just rut like animals and "liberate" ourselves from loving and stable relationships and family. It's just bullshit.
And most people can tell you.....sex will destroy a friendship. Not "strengthen" it.
It's always creepy when animals are called upon to argue for sexual behaviour of humans. As if animals are doing it.....it is natural for us to do it.
This idea was included in this article as well.....even though it was talking about how duck vaginas are made to prevent sperm from "forced mating" from being fertilized in the female.
Animals of all kinds will "force mate" other animals. So that's clearly very natural. We could use the same logic to argue that rape is natural and normal because animals do it.....you dont see that, but we could.
People take what they like and want to believe and find all kinds of ways to "justify" it, even though they dont need to. The "gay animal" shit is the worst. Yeah you will animals humping eachother.....it usually has to do with dominance, not "sexuality". And that same animal who humps the same sex will turn around and mate with the opposite sex. So... it's a stupid fucking argument.
Humans are far different in other animals on the planet. We are able to contemplate our own existence and make choices beyond what our animal urges tell us. We dont eat our own puke either. There are a lot of things done by animals that humans do not do.
This article of course has to make it seem like marriage/family and monogamy isnt natural and sex should just be this cheap thing a people just do with anyone for any reason. Like we dont have decades of data showing that children do way better in stable two parent homes and the family structure is the most important foundation on society. Nope. Let's "liberate" ourselves and enter into hedonistic slavery and let it fall like Rome.
Why do these people think "sexual liberation" (basically rutting like animals with no standards or any moral limits) is some progressive future thing? Even they point out humans did this kind of thing years ago through history. We are going BACKWARDS, not forward. Let's dehumanize sex and call it liberation and view other humans as pleasure objects. This is why societies fell in the past....let's do it again.
People need to go read all the academia about this. Look into Queer theory. Just the actual writings and "research". You'll see how the "innocent child" is regarded as oppression of childhood sexuality(yes....childhood sexuality) and how the adult/child binary is also regarded as a form of "oppression". So there is literature and ground work for making the MAP(pedophile) arguments on an academic level.
This is where we get things like "culturally relevant", "SEL(socail emotional learning)" from. Things in public schools right now that mesh this critical theory and queer theory shit into public school curriculums. This is why the FL bill is being attacked and lied about.
It's all sick and preverse and intended to dismantle the family structure. Teaching kids to be "fluid" and not have a solid identity.
Well @Dove I knew a real life situation where this guy couldn't control his Lust full urges. He drank to excess (barrelwash), used hookers, young girls, contracted VD & had several illegitimate children. Well 1 day he knocked up a young woman when he was 62. Eventually he got hepatitis C, cirrhosis of the liver, an assortment of other venereal diseases & had to get a trichotomy & he died at 67.
Neveremind killing a civilization uncontrolled sexual urges can be a destructive force. Can destroy a person too, eh.
Absolutely.
I dont know of any promiscuous people who are happy and well adjusted. I dont.
No matter how much people want to argue for a sexual free for all.....its not natural or good for human beings. You can see this with the depression and STI rates.
Its discussed as if we should all just rut like animals and "liberate" ourselves from loving and stable relationships and family. It's just bullshit.
And most people can tell you.....sex will destroy a friendship. Not "strengthen" it.
Well I'm not gonna place moral or value judgements as to what a person should or shouldn't do. But they gotta be careful who or what they sleep with esp if they are promiscuous. Some who are don't knock up or get knocked up. Some are lucky some aren't.
I think if they're gonna have prostitution it should be regulated primarily to help stop the spread of VD & to report superspreaders to the health authorities & police. Possibly to prevent unwanted pregnancies too.
And legal prostitution would be the death of many women and girls.