Fucking hell REALLY?

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,061
Location
Canada
I really dont mind it when you play stupid. The rest of the adults read just fine.

Yeah, I think The Leaker is doing her best to point out that you said this

"Much better than the kids that get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

when you really meant this

"Much better than when kids get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

She has the brain of a child, so she likes to have childish arguments.
 

Admin.

Don't look here, the joke is in your hand.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,371
Location
Waste, Fraud and Abuse.
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.
Ima search the internet day and night for things to be pissed off about!!!

Just follow news or socail media. I find vile psychotic things being done by leftwing cultists in the time it takes to pee.

It's like the party of racist hatred and sex grooming.

c39cc4c2bac17239919ff9f1a5c2cd98d67ab563_2_680x619.jpeg

Gays don't exist kiddies, lets get our pic taken with those hoors over there, and say fuck you to the President Of The United States for Jesus! (And NO Grooming!)
Much much better than the kids that get brought to the Folsom Street Fair. It is trashy AF tho.

What do the kids that get taken to the fair by their parents do that offends you so much?
Absolutely nothing.

That how are any kids any better than other kids? It's what you said.

Kids aren't responsible for the choices their parents make.
I really dont mind it when you play stupid. The rest of the adults read just fine.

You said what you said. Be accountable for your words, contard.
I am. libtard.
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
Much much better than the kids that get brought

It's what you said. What did I get wrong
Much much better than the kids that get brought to the Folsom Street Fair

It's what you said. What's much better? Being taught to hate is that's what's better?
Yep, thats what I said. Much better than the kids that get brought to fag fest.

Its (the situation) much much better than kids taken to fag fest.

As far as hate, hating a fake president installed due to a stolen election, thats a virtue. The problem I have with this is young children flipping the bird and doing it while on display with trashy whores. Simple, really.
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
I really dont mind it when you play stupid. The rest of the adults read just fine.

Yeah, I think The Leaker is doing her best to point out that you said this

"Much better than the kids that get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

when you really meant this

"Much better than when kids get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

She has the brain of a child, so she likes to have childish arguments.
Yea, I'm not indulging her play stupidity.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,496
Location
California
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.

Hey dumbass kids learning about their own bodies is not grooming. They've been doing it for years in different parts of the world. Those places have delayed sexual debut, fewer teen pregnancies and lower rates of STI's...why don't you learn a little bit about what you're saying before running your yap?!
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,496
Location
California
I really dont mind it when you play stupid. The rest of the adults read just fine.

Yeah, I think The Leaker is doing her best to point out that you said this

"Much better than the kids that get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

when you really meant this

"Much better than when kids get brought to the Folsom Street Fair"

She has the brain of a child, so she likes to have childish arguments.
Yea, I'm not indulging her play stupidity.

You know, I have this expectation that Americans will speak their native language with some sense of clarity and accuracy. I wasn't playing stupid. I was actually trying to decipher your broken English.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,496
Location
California
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?

That's okay.

When did this country ever have a case where the President had taken pictures with porn stars and been sued by any?
 

Admin.

Don't look here, the joke is in your hand.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,371
Location
Waste, Fraud and Abuse.
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?

That's okay.

When did this country ever have a case where the President had taken pictures with porn stars and been sued by any?
Or performed as the opening act for some hack pop star.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,496
Location
California
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?

That's okay.

When did this country ever have a case where the President had taken pictures with porn stars and been sued by any?
Or performed as the opening act for some hack pop star.

Or rolled around the floor pretending to wrestle?
 

Admin.

Don't look here, the joke is in your hand.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,371
Location
Waste, Fraud and Abuse.
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?

That's okay.

When did this country ever have a case where the President had taken pictures with porn stars and been sued by any?
Or performed as the opening act for some hack pop star.

Or rolled around the floor pretending to wrestle?
with another man, or the occasional trannie!
 
Reaction score
7,486
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.

Hey dumbass kids learning about their own bodies is not grooming. They've been doing it for years in different parts of the world. Those places have delayed sexual debut, fewer teen pregnancies and lower rates of STI's...why don't you learn a little bit about what you're saying before running your yap?!

Is that your excuse for this too?

 
OP
OP
Dove

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,044
Location
United states
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.

The sick and sad thing is? Your post shouldn't be given "wtf" and "confused" emojis.

If they want to think that anytime people point out what the woke left is doing its "fake outrage"? That's because that's all they ever muster.

As I have said, they dont actually care about anything. And they are narcissistic enough to assume OTHER people also dont really care about anything. And it's just some "one up" gas lighting game to them.
 
OP
OP
Dove

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,044
Location
United states
One doesn't have the manufactured outrage button. One just can't get excited about a show meant for home audiences where people can choose to participate or not, in a country that is not my own.

I doubt the five year olds are choosing to participate. This is child sexual grooming.
What about the kids being taught to fraternize with strippers and bad mouth their president, that level of "grooming" is ok in your world?

It's not okay. None of us said it was.

The question is why it's okay in YOUR world? Because we are watching you morons allow much worse while fishing for fringe ass shit of some random idiot who hates Biden doing something none of us approve of to kinda deflect from for forcing 5 year olds to look at adult junk and hear stories about "pleasure".
 
OP
OP
Dove

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,044
Location
United states


They put it bluntly why "trans rights" is a huge problem for women and homosexuals. If the definition of these words is now up to individual interpretation, well womens rights and gay rights case to exist.

These people who support this are philosophically retarded and do not understand this at all. Even as we see the results playing out. This is blatant Orwell tactics with language and gaslighting.
 
Reaction score
368
I had a nice discussion about this with the Florida parental rights bill(which is where most of this debate got brought to the forefront from).
The media and far left's reaction is to smear it as a "oh my gawd! you can't say gay" bill and admit they didn't even read the fucking thing, then when pressed extremely hard on it, it get watered down to the "well....they don't define what age appropriate means". Two different messages. one is banning a word like they claim, and another is just vague wording that can be fixed very easily. It shows that the objections are nothing but either disingenuous pandering or they are up to creepy shit they don't want the public to know and would rightfully outraged if they did.

What really creeps me out in this whole thing is that these left-wing activists types keep tryig to shoehorn lgbtq+ in terms of teaching kids about sex. Are they so fucking scared that by the 4th grade that kids will automatically be straight if you can't tell 5 year olds about how you got used as a rainbow-flagged cum dumpster? "but dat doesn't happen!" Well why the fuck are you so fucking opposed to a law to make sure that stays the case? There are plenty of gays without you teaching them the birds and the bees at the 8th grade level, and makes your objection completely moot and more like a hidden agenda.
 

Admin.

Don't look here, the joke is in your hand.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
22,371
Location
Waste, Fraud and Abuse.
I had a nice discussion about this with the Florida parental rights bill(which is where most of this debate got brought to the forefront from).
The media and far left's reaction is to smear it as a "oh my gawd! you can't say gay" bill and admit they didn't even read the fucking thing, then when pressed extremely hard on it, it get watered down to the "well....they don't define what age appropriate means". Two different messages. one is banning a word like they claim, and another is just vague wording that can be fixed very easily. It shows that the objections are nothing but either disingenuous pandering or they are up to creepy shit they don't want the public to know and would rightfully outraged if they did.

What really creeps me out in this whole thing is that these left-wing activists types keep tryig to shoehorn lgbtq+ in terms of teaching kids about sex. Are they so fucking scared that by the 4th grade that kids will automatically be straight if you can't tell 5 year olds about how you got used as a rainbow-flagged cum dumpster? "but dat doesn't happen!" Well why the fuck are you so fucking opposed to a law to make sure that stays the case? There are plenty of gays without you teaching them the birds and the bees at the 8th grade level, and makes your objection completely moot and more like a hidden agenda.
WTAF?