- Messages
- 56,089
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Oh come on now. That is simply so uncouth. Do not let democracy rob you of your joy.
Why can't I have one bad day?
You had 1460+ bad days.
Oh come on now. That is simply so uncouth. Do not let democracy rob you of your joy.
You seem pretty sure of that and out of pity I am simply uninspired to make any attempts to convince you otherwise.Why can't I have one bad day?
You had 1460+ bad days.
You seem pretty sure of that and out of pity I am simply uninspired to make any attempts to convince you otherwise.
Stay strong.
Would you wear a proven ineffective single-layer fabric mask over your face to, "own the conservatives"?Would you put a maxi pad on your ears to "own the libs"?
Would you wear a proven ineffective single-layer fabric mask over your face to, "own the conservatives"?
Silly question, I know; because you did.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?I didn't wear a mask to thwart anyone. I don't do things to hurt or bother other people. I'm not a sociopath.
I did it to protect myself and others.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?
Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?I knew that it did.
Snopes said:This photograph (and others like it) reflects accurate disclaimers on the packaging of face masks that caution users, "THIS PRODUCT IS NOT A RESPIRATOR AND WILL NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES OR CONTAMINANTS."
Boo hoo hoo i had to wear a piece of paper over my face during a mass epidemic, muh freedumb got all stoled from me!!!Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?
Take note of Snopes' favorite tactic:
They label the claim as, "False", but then look a little further down:
...where they concede that, in fact, the pictured disclaimer is True.
This is an often-employed trick of "fact checkers" -- they debunk something other than the claim under scrutiny, and proceed to label the claim under scrutiny as "false" on that basis.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?
Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?
Take note of Snopes' favorite tactic:
They label the claim as, "False", but then look a little further down:
...where they concede that, in fact, the pictured disclaimer is True.
This is an often-employed trick of "fact checkers" -- they debunk something other than the claim under scrutiny, and proceed to label the claim under scrutiny as "false" on that basis.
I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs, were we being brainwashed and controlled by the libs?I knew that it did.
I didn't wear them in my home, in my car or outdoors. I wore them when in close contact with others, which I limited too.
I'll go with the scientific evidence, not Snopes. Don't be offended by my standards.
"Conclusions: This work shows (1) that both theoretical and empirical evidence is consistent with masks protecting against respiratory infections and (2) that non-linear effects and statistical considerations regarding the percentage of exposures for which masks are worn must be taken into account when designing empirical studies and interpreting their results."
I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs, were we being brainwashed and controlled by the libs?
Another reason why your heroes lost.Boo hoo hoo i had to wear a piece of paper over my face during a mass epidemic, muh freedumb got all stoled from me!!!
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against masks with this one. Bet you can't tell, either.I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs,
That would only be possible if you had standards.Don't be offended by my standards.
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against masks with this one. Bet you can't tell, either.