Lily
Goderator ☠️
- Reaction score
- 23,379
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Oh come on now. That is simply so uncouth. Do not let democracy rob you of your joy.
Why can't I have one bad day?
You had 1460+ bad days.
Oh come on now. That is simply so uncouth. Do not let democracy rob you of your joy.
You seem pretty sure of that and out of pity I am simply uninspired to make any attempts to convince you otherwise.Why can't I have one bad day?
You had 1460+ bad days.
You seem pretty sure of that and out of pity I am simply uninspired to make any attempts to convince you otherwise.
Stay strong.
Would you wear a proven ineffective single-layer fabric mask over your face to, "own the conservatives"?Would you put a maxi pad on your ears to "own the libs"?
Would you wear a proven ineffective single-layer fabric mask over your face to, "own the conservatives"?
Silly question, I know; because you did.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?I didn't wear a mask to thwart anyone. I don't do things to hurt or bother other people. I'm not a sociopath.
I did it to protect myself and others.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?
Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?I knew that it did.
Snopes said:This photograph (and others like it) reflects accurate disclaimers on the packaging of face masks that caution users, "THIS PRODUCT IS NOT A RESPIRATOR AND WILL NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES OR CONTAMINANTS."
Boo hoo hoo i had to wear a piece of paper over my face during a mass epidemic, muh freedumb got all stoled from me!!!Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?
Take note of Snopes' favorite tactic:
They label the claim as, "False", but then look a little further down:
...where they concede that, in fact, the pictured disclaimer is True.
This is an often-employed trick of "fact checkers" -- they debunk something other than the claim under scrutiny, and proceed to label the claim under scrutiny as "false" on that basis.
Even after you knew it didn't do that?
Let's turn to Snopes, shall we?
Take note of Snopes' favorite tactic:
They label the claim as, "False", but then look a little further down:
...where they concede that, in fact, the pictured disclaimer is True.
This is an often-employed trick of "fact checkers" -- they debunk something other than the claim under scrutiny, and proceed to label the claim under scrutiny as "false" on that basis.
I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs, were we being brainwashed and controlled by the libs?I knew that it did.
I didn't wear them in my home, in my car or outdoors. I wore them when in close contact with others, which I limited too.
I'll go with the scientific evidence, not Snopes. Don't be offended by my standards.
"Conclusions: This work shows (1) that both theoretical and empirical evidence is consistent with masks protecting against respiratory infections and (2) that non-linear effects and statistical considerations regarding the percentage of exposures for which masks are worn must be taken into account when designing empirical studies and interpreting their results."
I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs, were we being brainwashed and controlled by the libs?
Another reason why your heroes lost.Boo hoo hoo i had to wear a piece of paper over my face during a mass epidemic, muh freedumb got all stoled from me!!!
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against masks with this one. Bet you can't tell, either.I think we were all taught to cover our mouths when coughing among other people because germs,
That would only be possible if you had standards.Don't be offended by my standards.
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against masks with this one. Bet you can't tell, either.
I can see that you believe you are wholeheartedly.I am strong.
You guys spent all morning whining about a "stolen" election. My opinions are based on evidence.
Your anger and bitterness provides all the evidence to support my comments.
How many ass gapes do you fill in a day, you really think TrumpF will make business better ? Better buy more loob, will that also be cheaper LOLI'm content just basking in your angst. "That which upsets Communists pleases and amuses Me."
That’s about all you’ve got. Save it for yourself. See, I’ve got optionsI'm content just basking in your angst. "That which upsets Communists pleases and amuses Me."
Cry more.How many ass gapes do you fill in a day, you really think TrumpF will make business better ? Better buy more loob, will that also be cheaper LOL
That would only be possible if you had standards.
You've got all you ever had: delusion. Popular vote just proved it, but you refuse to listen, let alone comprehend.I certainly do. I don't login into cesspools like TBC.
I recognize that you're a douchebag.
And that you and your brethren are weak men. Believe me, I got your number.
You've got all you ever had: delusion. Popular vote just proved it, but you refuse to listen, let alone comprehend.
Take a second to entertain just the possibility that it's you who is out of touch.I understand that the American people poorly understand why we are where we are.
Take a second to entertain just the possibility that it's you who is out of touch.
I just came across this:
Mary and her brother, Fred Trump III, contested the will, causing Donald to cut them off the family's medical-insurance plan, which their grandfather had provided free of charge while he was alive.
Mary also claims Donald Trump used shady tax schemes to transfer more than $400 million of his father's money to keep his businesses afloat, countering his claim that he was a self-made man.
~ apparently, she has the tax documents to prove this.
I've considered the possibility, and challenge it head-on. You turn up your nose and refuse to even meaningfully engage with it.Don't ask of me what you don't ask of yourself.
Need more loob![]()