OK I'll spell this out as plain as I can.
First divide the world into economic politics and cultural politics.
Economic politics is the money in your pocket, where to live, work and eat etc.
Most people and gone through this so understand the motives so it doesn't matter if your a commie or a capitalist you assume good intent.
Cultural politics is everything else.
These issues emerge once you settle the first group and are not universally shared. Therefor you don't know the motives of others and as politics corrodes you start assuming the worst of others who do not share your views or interest in that issue.
The problem is when you start prioritising your cultural politics over other peoples economic politics and let me give you a couple of examples.
The English civil war, this is where the King wanted to impose his cultural politics on the economic politics of farmers and small land owners, that is divine rule by god.
The American civil war, this is where the north(The Republicans) imposed the cultural abolitionist views on the South's (Democrats) economic views agrarian slavery.
As you can see in one the culturalists were the good guys and in one the bad guys so you then have to ask who is getting screwed?
Well its the poor, The english farmers and the black slaves.
So who is getting screwed here? The working class who see wage and opportunities stagnate or decline by mass immigration while the wealthier indulge their cultural politics of "not being racist".
The fact the examples both involved war is not a coincidence.
Same old story isn't it?
If I could LIKE this more than once, I would.
"It was James Carville who famously said, “It's the economy, stupid!” Carville was an elections strategist for then-Governor Bill Clinton, and he helped Clinton beat President George H.W. Bush in 1992 in the midst of a recession that left many Americans out of work and in debt.Nov 4, 2020"
The economy must come above all things because you want something where people have equal opportunity to prosper. The problem I have with the right is that yes some folks are just against big gov't & all regulations because they want to make money while literally killing people & the environment, BUT, the problem I have with the left is they want to regulate everything to the point where the cost ls so much to live, the gap between wealth and poor is just as egregious and all the people they have living on the streets are wasting away. And these folks don't even see that?
I've seen the narrative that blue states pay for red states. Red states are cheaper to live. Having a cheaper standard of living where MOAR people can afford to start from nothing is actually a benefit. Hello? Hi. Logic here. Nice to see you again. A homeless person can move to Alabama and work their way up. Can they do that in California? Hahaha fuck no. The stupid is too strong there.
Capitalism works. Period. Full stop. Yes, you need regulations to make sure people ain't fucking over people but when you get to California regulation levels, you done gone beyond fucked up.
I think Lincoln had to take a stand against slavery because even without the bible, the dude just knew going forward as a country the USA would never survive thinking slavery was a-okay and being divided.
I know people who are against abortion and I can see where they are coming from but if you truly want a world where no abortion exists, you must allow individual freedom and have it be a choice made rather than a mandate forced.
But I totally relate to your point that economics can be easier to breach across the political aisle than ingrained core beliefs. Although, even Obama was originally against same sex marriage.
There has to be a healthy respect but there is not. Liberals think conservatives are ignorant and conservatives think liberals are lazy. Spoiler Alert: Both are right. While conservatives may not have gone to college, they worked, they provided. And while liberals did go to college, they ended up whining about not having student loans forgiven. But hey, if we were all clones, we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we now?