Manchin prefers not to

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
Now these stinking filthy democRATs know how it was to have scumbag Juan McStain as a GOP Senator all those years!!! PWN3D!
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
25,124
Location
United states
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
Ilhan Omar, shitbag muhzie extraordinaire, insulted Manchen more than she did "some people who did some things" that blew up the twin towers yesterday. Filthy fucking cunt muhzie.
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
Ilhan Omar, shitbag muhzie extraordinaire, insulted Manchen more than she did "some people who did some things" that blew up the twin towers yesterday. Filthy fucking cunt muhzie.

At least 1 of those buildings, WTC7, fell down within hours even tho no plane actually hit it.
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,263
Location
Springfield
Ilhan Omar, shitbag muhzie extraordinaire, insulted Manchen more than she did "some people who did some things" that blew up the twin towers yesterday. Filthy fucking cunt muhzie.

At least 1 of those buildings, WTC7, fell down within hours even tho no plane actually hit it.
Yea? That was caused by fire and one of the biggest arc flash events in history. If you're gonna act like such a stoop, you should start worshiping hitler too, dumb ass.
 

Oerdin

Regular Member
Reaction score
7,489
Ilhan Omar, shitbag muhzie extraordinaire, insulted Manchen more than she did "some people who did some things" that blew up the twin towers yesterday. Filthy fucking cunt muhzie.

At least 1 of those buildings, WTC7, fell down within hours even tho no plane actually hit it.

Damaged from falling debris.
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?
 
OP
OP

deport_liberals

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Turkey
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?
 
OP
OP

deport_liberals

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Turkey
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
So...according to this video, 1 part had been passed = the $1 trillion infrastructure component and was signed into law, but the other $2 trillion the progressive wing of the Democratic Party was banking on, did not as Manchin dropped his support for it a couple of days ago:

 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
This will be one more thing bidens handlers will have to remind him of daily.

Well, it wasn't a complete loss either.

I think the Democrats were being a tad unrealistic.

1st they asked the Republicans to help them pass a $1 trillion bill which they did.

and then the Progressives want an additional $2 trillion.

But Manchin never said he'd go beyond $1.75 trillion total?

So in reality, if those are the facts, then Manchin never went back on his word.

Everyone knew that was his limit, but they insisted on an additional $2 trillion when all he said he would tolerate was an additional $500-750 billion.

So I think it was the Democrats who fumbled the ball by setting a target which they knew a key member of their team would not support.

anyways a $1 trillion infrastructure bill is still a lot.
In Canada, that would be $100 billion given that we're 1/10th the size of the US.

Essentially that was Trump's idea, his plan and Biden got it passed for him which many republicans supported.
 
OP
OP

deport_liberals

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Turkey
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?

Yes, exactly. The reason the lefties are so upset is that they wanted the whole package voated on at once; they knew this would happen. But the dem leadership is incompetent, so here we are...
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?

Yes, exactly. The reason the lefties are so upset is that they wanted the whole package voated on at once; they knew this would happen. But the dem leadership is incompetent, so here we are...


As an outsider to this issue supporting neither side, I'd have to say that the Democrats (the Progressives in particular) had asked for and expected too much.

That'd be $300 billion In Canada over 10 years?

so the max our government has pledged for infrastrcuture is about $100 billion USD or roughy 1/3 per Capita of what the Democrats asked for.

I think they asked for too much.

And rather than pout about it, maybe they should come down a bit and aim for $1 trillion?

I mean the Bush tax cuts amounted to $2 trillion.

And that was considered too much.
 
OP
OP

deport_liberals

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Turkey
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?

Yes, exactly. The reason the lefties are so upset is that they wanted the whole package voated on at once; they knew this would happen. But the dem leadership is incompetent, so here we are...


As an outsider to this issue supporting neither side, I'd have to say that the Democrats (the Progressives in particular) had asked for and expected too much.

That'd be $300 billion In Canada over 10 years?

so the max our government has pledged for infrastrcuture is about $100 billion USD or roughy 1/3 per Capita of what the Democrats asked for.

I think they asked for too much.

And rather than pout about it, maybe they should come down a bit and aim for $1 trillion?

I mean the Bush tax cuts amounted to $2 trillion.

And that was considered too much.

It's embarrassing for the supposed President to be upstaged by a West Virginia Senator...and Biden doesn't say a damn thing about it. TRUMP would have destroyed Manchin by now...
 

Joe

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,162
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?

Yes, exactly. The reason the lefties are so upset is that they wanted the whole package voated on at once; they knew this would happen. But the dem leadership is incompetent, so here we are...


As an outsider to this issue supporting neither side, I'd have to say that the Democrats (the Progressives in particular) had asked for and expected too much.

That'd be $300 billion In Canada over 10 years?

so the max our government has pledged for infrastrcuture is about $100 billion USD or roughy 1/3 per Capita of what the Democrats asked for.

I think they asked for too much.

And rather than pout about it, maybe they should come down a bit and aim for $1 trillion?

I mean the Bush tax cuts amounted to $2 trillion.

And that was considered too much.

It's embarrassing for the supposed President to be upstaged by a West Virginia Senator...and Biden doesn't say a damn thing about it. TRUMP would have destroyed Manchin by now...


...yeah & Trump would also have destroyed his own chances of passing anything as well. If Manchin is the Democrats most powerful Senator in some respects he is also for the Republicans too. Neither party it appears can pass anything without Manchin's approval or support. They both need him.

Despite Biden's latest setback, Trump should actually thank Biden for passing his infrastructure bill. Even Republican stalwarts like Lindsay Graham supported it. That's what Trump wanted all this time & Biden delivered it for him.
 

Seamajor

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,877
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


Maybe he can get the US Mexican border closed and you be dead. Might be worth it.
 

Levon

Philosopher King
Site Supporter
Reaction score
1,383
Location
West Coast
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


Maybe he can get the US Mexican border closed and you be dead. Might be worth it.


Surely you're not proposing a drone strike in Turkish airspace, amigo?
 

Oerdin

Regular Member
Reaction score
7,489
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?


They were always separate bills and the fake ass infrastructure bill was already signed into law. De operate leadership tried to hold the fake ass infrastructure bill (of which only 8% is actually infrastructure) hostage in order to demand passage of the garbage $4.5 trillion magical omnibus grab bag of partisan pork. Thankfully, that failed.
 

Oerdin

Regular Member
Reaction score
7,489
"Many Democrats feel the bill is essential to the party's chances of maintaining control of Congress in next year's elections."

Which is all they will ever actually care about. Control. They dont care about how this could impact and harm regular people.

And the whole "common ground" bullshit they use to make it seem like it's the people who dont support what they want to do are the problem. Its them who refuse the "common ground". They all think like this and use this same manipulation tactic.

Even the voters who support these shit bags use that tactic. If you oppose them, YOU are being divisive. YOU are the problem. They say Trump is divisive and blame him for their responses to him. Basically by disagreeing with democrats....no matter how valid the reason, they get nasty and blame the one disagreeing of failing to have a "common ground".

Did Manchin's refusal to back this bill nullify or kill the previous trillion dollar infrastructure bill?




Or is this a separate social spending bill from the previous infrastructure bill that Biden had signed into law a month or 2 ago?

I was a bit confused by the reports.

Because it seemed to me that Manchin along with many Republicans did support an infrastructure bill to improve highways and telecommunications in the US.

Wasn't that part of it already signed into law?

Yes it was, but the progs were promised they'd get this one too. Then President Manchin changed his mind and the howling began.

But the main problem is that Brandon controls his party as well as he controls his bowels.


So then Manchin actually did support an Infrastructure bill that already got passed and will be implemented?

Is that correct?

Yes


..and so the Democrats wanted Manchin to help them pass an additional $2 trillion in social spending?

That would total $3 trillion including the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that had previously been passed?

Was that the situation?

Yes, exactly. The reason the lefties are so upset is that they wanted the whole package voated on at once; they knew this would happen. But the dem leadership is incompetent, so here we are...


As an outsider to this issue supporting neither side, I'd have to say that the Democrats (the Progressives in particular) had asked for and expected too much.

That'd be $300 billion In Canada over 10 years?

so the max our government has pledged for infrastrcuture is about $100 billion USD or roughy 1/3 per Capita of what the Democrats asked for.

I think they asked for too much.

And rather than pout about it, maybe they should come down a bit and aim for $1 trillion?

I mean the Bush tax cuts amounted to $2 trillion.

And that was considered too much.

It's embarrassing for the supposed President to be upstaged by a West Virginia Senator...and Biden doesn't say a damn thing about it. TRUMP would have destroyed Manchin by now...


There was never the votes for the Democrats $4.5 trillion partisan pork give away. Ever. Manchin gave them a written list of the max he would support back in February and even Chuck Schummer signed it saying he acknowledged that was the max Manchin would support. Dems spent the last year trying to berate and brow beat six senators into going along with a epically massive pork omnibus bill they knew couldn't pass.

It didn't work, the leadership always knew it wouldn't work, but they stupidly kept telling the public it would work. That was always a stupid strategy to lie to the public and now it blew up in their faces. Good.
 

Admin.

Release The Epstein Files.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,520
Location
Where the forest meets the sea.
269739625_451675779659208_8345393947015011426_n.jpg