The utter hypocrisy of Chump’s citizenship offer to white South Africans

Seamajor

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,653
Yes, the ancestors of the Boers got to South Africa in the early 1600s, about 400 years ago, while 90% of the ancestors of all "black" South Africans migrated to South Africa from central Africa within the last 200 years.

Did you misunderstand the point? Which words did you not understand?

Put aside your Hate for white Europeans for a moment and consider the position you are taking. Everywhere else on the globe, your Leftist betters make a hate issue of the plight of all the poor "indigenes" like the Maori in New Zealand, the Abos in Australia and the injuns here in the US that you constantly remind us that we superior whites "stole" their land from; but in this singular case, you and your Leftist betters are against the "indigenes" of South Africa, the Boers, for no other reason than they are white people.

One would begin to think that you people are racists who hate white people for no other reason than their milky alabaster skin tone.

Explain yourself, brown girl?
Brown girl? Why not take a shot at explaining yourself.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,494
Location
Chicagoland
Yes. See my edit, you utter moron.

Fucking Boers are far, far from being indigenous South Africans, you tool.
How do you define an indigene, Lotus? Does it depend on the skin tone? When the Dutch Boers arrive in the early 1600s, the only "indigenous" group was the San people who were widely scattered bands of hunter/gatherers. The Bantu (black niggers) didn't begin their expansion to the south from central Africa for another 200 years, and most of the migrants from central Africa were attracted by the superior civil society that was built by the white Boers and the British.

The whites were there first.
 

Admin.

Our Tariffs go up to eleven.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
20,116
Location
I’m a Champion golfer at all my courses!
Please link to any NPR program, ever, that even suggested that all white people in South Africa should be exterminated. While you're at it, also link to any liberal American who ever said that, even once. I know no one here ever suggested it.
What about white peoples in America?


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,868
Location
De donde me da la gana.
Yes, the ancestors of the Boers got to South Africa in the early 1600s, about 400 years ago, while 90% of the ancestors of all "black" South Africans migrated to South Africa from central Africa within the last 200 years.

Did you misunderstand the point? Which words did you not understand?

Put aside your Hate for white Europeans for a moment and consider the position you are taking. Everywhere else on the globe, your Leftist betters make a hate issue of the plight of all the poor "indigenes" like the Maori in New Zealand, the Abos in Australia and the injuns here in the US that you constantly remind us that we superior whites "stole" their land from; but in this singular case, you and your Leftist betters are against the "indigenes" of South Africa, the Boers, for no other reason than they are white people.

One would begin to think that you people are racists who hate white people for no other reason than their milky alabaster skin tone.

Explain yourself, brown girl?


I'm brown today?

Good to know. I enjoy how my color changes depending on what specious argument you want to make.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,868
Location
De donde me da la gana.
How do you define an indigene, Lotus? Does it depend on the skin tone? When the Dutch Boers arrive in the early 1600s, the only "indigenous" group was the San people who were widely scattered bands of hunter/gatherers. The Bantu (black niggers) didn't begin their expansion to the south from central Africa for another 200 years, and most of the migrants from central Africa were attracted by the superior civil society that was built by the white Boers and the British.

The whites were there first.


Your own post says the San were there first.
 

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
10,078
Location
Portugal
How do you define an indigene, Lotus? Does it depend on the skin tone? When the Dutch Boers arrive in the early 1600s, the only "indigenous" group was the San people who were widely scattered bands of hunter/gatherers. The Bantu (black niggers) didn't begin their expansion to the south from central Africa for another 200 years, and most of the migrants from central Africa were attracted by the superior civil society that was built by the white Boers and the British.

The whites were there first.
OMFG. The Boers came from the Netherlands and Germany maybe 350 years ago. There were people in South Africa for 100,000 years before that. So, no I definitely don't define indigene according to who killed more people in a certain location. I didn't say anything about color, but if you must, the Bantu people were there more than 1000 years before the Boers.
 

Blandscape

Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,151
Location
Scotland
How do you define an indigene, Lotus? Does it depend on the skin tone? When the Dutch Boers arrive in the early 1600s, the only "indigenous" group was the San people who were widely scattered bands of hunter/gatherers. The Bantu (black niggers) didn't begin their expansion to the south from central Africa for another 200 years, and most of the migrants from central Africa were attracted by the superior civil society that was built by the white Boers and the British.

The whites were there first.
Who the fuck is feeding you this histrionic garbage boy?… we need names we can give to both your fucking parole officer and your social worker, who should be fired without due process for allowing you internet access.

Reference any of your shite, and watch me destroy it.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,868
Location
De donde me da la gana.
OMFG. The Boers came from the Netherlands and Germany maybe 350 years ago. There were people in South Africa for 100,000 years before that. So, no I definitely don't define indigene according to who killed more people in a certain location. I didn't say anything about color, but if you must, the Bantu people were there more than 1000 years before the Boers.

Some white people believe that any land they want is theirs, still to this day.

Like Greenland and Canada.
 

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
10,078
Location
Portugal
More info for the informationally challenged @Reggie_Essent

Khoisan (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) or Khoe-Sān (pronounced
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) is an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for the various
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
who traditionally speak non-
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, combining the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
peoples. Khoisan populations traditionally speak
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. They are considered to be the historical communities throughout Southern Africa, remaining predominant until European colonisation. The Khoisan have lived in areas climatically unfavorable to Bantu (sorghum-based) agriculture, from the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, where Khoekhoe populations of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
people are prevalent groups. Considerable mingling with Bantu-speaking groups is evidenced by prevalence of click phonemes in many
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Many Khoesan peoples are the descendants of an early dispersal of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to Southern Africa before 150,000 years ago.


500px-San_tribesman.jpg


San man of Namibia