Can't wait to see how Trumptards spin this.The big Pussy didn’t want to be bothered with it any more.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
It's not about legal immunity, it's about making El Trumpty feel sad, get over it bootlickers, we are not a Theocracy.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
The issue about liability has been the GOP not wanting employers held accountable for employees contracting Covid19 due to their negligence.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
And apparently dems gave less of a shit with their joke assed $600 checks. How about all that other largess they're throwing out! LOL!
He never gave a shit about the 2k for working people. NE.VER.
It's not about legal immunity, it's about making El Trumpty feel sad, get over it bootlickers, we are not a Theocracy.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
The issue about liability has been the GOP not wanting employers held accountable for employees contracting Covid19 due to their negligence.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
Carry on thought.
Tell us in full detail about McConnel's opposition to corporations not being held accountable for their actions.
So are you saying he doesn't want propaganda edited?It's not about legal immunity, it's about making El Trumpty feel sad, get over it bootlickers, we are not a Theocracy.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
Actually, section 230 is explicitly about immunity from lawsuits on the grounds that they are not editors but simple common carriers like the phone company. Except it is very clear companies like Facebook, youtube, and Twitter all edit material as well so they shouldn't have immunity from lawsuits.
Oh, I am. One of the many reasons I had little regard for Obama, you know,The issue about liability has been the GOP not wanting employers held accountable for employees contracting Covid19 due to their negligence.
. Ball in McConnell's court
How interesting
. He can go along with what will seem agreement with Trump, and earlier with the likes of Bernie and OAC
or maintain his position that the GOP is in the Post Trump failure era.
. So fascinating.
Reportedly McConnell wants to tie it in one bill with a repeal of section 230 from the 1996 internet regulation act. I'd be fore this, everyone should be for this, because big tech shouldn't have legal immunity. They act like editors not common carriers so they should lose section 230 protections and let everyone they wrong sue them in court.
Carry on thought.
Tell us in full detail about McConnel's opposition to corporations not being held accountable for their actions.
You are confusing an old proposal which never got passed with the section 230 issue. I am all for regular people being able to sue corporations
You should be too.
Nunya bidness - look it up, june.Which protections from lawsuits are you speaking about wrt Obama?
..buy a lot of sinkers, circle hooks and braid, aye CaseyK?Something is better than nothing at all! Maybe he wanted to go ahead and pass something while the house and senate argue over the $2k deal. He knows the American people need money now and there's no sense in them waiting any longer. Is $600 much? Fuck no. It wouldn't catch anyone up on the bills that they owe but guess what? $600 is better than $0 all day long!
Nunya bidness - look it up, june.Which protections from lawsuits are you speaking about wrt Obama?
..buy a lot of sinkers, circle hooks and braid, aye CaseyK?Something is better than nothing at all! Maybe he wanted to go ahead and pass something while the house and senate argue over the $2k deal. He knows the American people need money now and there's no sense in them waiting any longer. Is $600 much? Fuck no. It wouldn't catch anyone up on the bills that they owe but guess what? $600 is better than $0 all day long!
THese fuckheads will find a way to cry no matter what he doesSomething is better than nothing at all! Maybe he wanted to go ahead and pass something while the house and senate argue over the $2k deal. He knows the American people need money now and there's no sense in them waiting any longer. Is $600 much? Fuck no. It wouldn't catch anyone up on the bills that they owe but guess what? $600 is better than $0 all day long!
. Of course I do.Nunya bidness - look it up, june.Which protections from lawsuits are you speaking about wrt Obama?
So, you have no idea idea what you are talking about. How unsurprising.
CheckmateEven CNN is admiting Dems don't want to have to vote for or against an enlarged stimulus check if they also have to vote to remove immunity from lawsuits for big tech. Dems love to suck big techs cock as they are a big three donor lobby (after banks and drug companies). They now the public wants the checks and hates big tech monopolies but the Dems don't want to offender one of their largest donors.
Hehe he. Good move by Mitch. Make the Dems show their true colors on the record for everyone to see. I can almost hear the 2022 campaign attack ads now.