Underground Pipelines are the safest way to move petrochemicals they said.

[Admin.]

Pipeline spills 300,000 gallons of diesel near New Orleans

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Oerdin]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

 

[Lily]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

He's waiting for a Tweet from Youtube.

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

 

[Lily]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

He's waiting for a Tweet from Youtube.

I would think "Instagram" would be faster.

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

 

[Lily]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

Why is it so hard for them to articulate their thoughts fully?

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

Why is it so hard for them to articulate their thoughts fully?

I know it's not always easy to express your thoughts clearly to another, but "these people" seem to excel at not expressing their "thoughts" clearly.

 

[The Prowler]

From the article, 3rd paragraph:

"The pipeline's owner said 315,000 gallons (1.2 million gallons) "

What kind of trashy news organization cannot make it past 3 paragraphs without making a stupid mistake?

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?(preventable btw. This was negligence)

That's what you are saying?

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

 

[Lily]

lay more pipe

Which they don't appear to be very good at either, if ya know what I mean...*wink* *wink*

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

 

[Dove]

And yes why wouldnt we want the Keystone?

 

[Admin.]

And yes why wouldnt we want the Keystone?

Why wouldn't you want to repair the risk we're already wearing out, before creating more risk?

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!

 

[Joe]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

Could transport of oil by rail be a safer option?

I suppose that carries is own set of risks eh.

 

[Lily]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

Could transport of oil by rail be a safer option?

I suppose that carries is own set of risks eh.

It does. Pipeline may be the safest mode of transportation. Overdone wasn't able to finish his train of thought. I think nuclear energy might be the best type of energy if climate change is to be taken seriously.

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!

I asked you to SHOW me.

I already know the infrastructure bill was overloaded with pork.

That's a common tactic. Something we need gets presented, and a shit ton of pork gets added so that when the others object, they get blamed for "fighting" the needed thing.

And YOU are falling for this. And everytime you guys are asked a question like this to show your claims, you insult people. Was I insulting you?

Go ahead and show where Republicans are fighting infrastructure bill? Like the infrastructure part. Please?

 

[Admin.]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!

I asked you to SHOW me.

I already know the infrastructure bill was overloaded with pork.

That's a common tactic. Something we need gets presented, and a shit ton of pork gets added so that when the others object, they get blamed for "fighting" the needed thing.

And YOU are falling for this. And everytime you guys are asked a question like this to show your claims, you insult people. Was I insulting you?

Go ahead and show where Republicans are fighting infrastructure bill? Like the infrastructure part. Please?

Which projects in particular do you find to be mere pork barrel?

 

[Lokmar]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Safest what? Energy source or transportation of energy?

Could transport of oil by rail be a safer option?

I suppose that carries is own set of risks eh.

It does. Pipeline may be the safest mode of transportation. Overdone wasn't able to finish his train of thought. I think nuclear energy might be the best type of energy if climate change is to be taken seriously.

Too bad you people shut nuclear energy down.

 

[LotusBud]

Pipeline spills 300,000 gallons of diesel near New Orleans

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Tragic.

 

[LotusBud]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!

I asked you to SHOW me.

I already know the infrastructure bill was overloaded with pork.

That's a common tactic. Something we need gets presented, and a shit ton of pork gets added so that when the others object, they get blamed for "fighting" the needed thing.

And YOU are falling for this. And everytime you guys are asked a question like this to show your claims, you insult people. Was I insulting you?

Go ahead and show where Republicans are fighting infrastructure bill? Like the infrastructure part. Please?

Do you honestly not realize both parties do this? Republicans do every single thing you accuse Democrats of doing, yet you are still 100% anti-Democrats and pro-Republicans. You never call out Repulicans for any of their crimes.

 

[Oerdin]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

See what I mean? Aidsman is dumb as a rock and can't even follow simple English.

 

[Dove]

It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.

Don’t give up on your ESL classes

HOW did you not understand what he said?

Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.

Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.

So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?

Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.

So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?

That's what you are saying?

The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.

No they havent. Where do you get that?

Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?

Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?

Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.

PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!

I asked you to SHOW me.

I already know the infrastructure bill was overloaded with pork.

That's a common tactic. Something we need gets presented, and a shit ton of pork gets added so that when the others object, they get blamed for "fighting" the needed thing.

And YOU are falling for this. And everytime you guys are asked a question like this to show your claims, you insult people. Was I insulting you?

Go ahead and show where Republicans are fighting infrastructure bill? Like the infrastructure part. Please?

Which projects in particular do you find to be mere pork barrel?

Well as many other Americans, I assert the infrastructure bill should ONLY deal with infrastructure.

All the other more partisan attachments should be separate and compromised on. That's fair, considering we all pay for this.

If infrastructure is so important (and we all agree it's very important....no debate on that) than why cant we just pass that and leave the other stuff up for discussion?

You see this as Republicans fighting the infrastructure. That's what you are supposed to see. This is the game/scam politicains run on the public. We see infrastructure being held hostage until we agree with all the partisan additions to the bill.

So how does that get worked out? Because the one thing we do all agree on is we need that infrastructure. That's not what Republicans are fighting against at all. If the democrats truly cared about the infrastructure they wouldnt hold it hostage trying to ram in their wishlists.

Not sure if this is still in it but they had more bails outs, more corporate welfare in there. Do YOU want that shit? While so many regular working Americans lost their businesses?

 

[Oerdin]

Only 9% of the so called infrastructure bill actually had anything to do with infrastructure.