It is the safest. There is so such thing as risk free energy just risk minimized. If you weren't so low I.Q. you'd have figured that out by now.
Don’t give up on your ESL classes
HOW did you not understand what he said?
Admin.....this doesnt prove it isnt the safest. There is a risk with all of it. This has the LEAST amount.
Sounds like an Op-Ed Duh'v.
So the risk:benefit ratio just isnt a thing now?
Asking for that risk benefit analysis is the gist of my query. Please try reading to understand not just to respond.
So to clarify your OP, this is evidence to you that this ISNT the safest way based on this accident?
That's what you are saying?
The Republican Party has been fighting The D people tooth and nail against rebuilding worn out roads and bridges and pipelines etc, yanno build back better????? now here we have oil pipelines so corroded they're springing leaks.....while all "you people" want to do is drill more holes and lay more pipe....while ignoring what you already have.
No they havent. Where do you get that?
Because the infrastructure bill Trump wanted was shoved to the side until democrats could add tons of PORK?
Do you guys ever pay attention to what's in these bills and what people actually have a problem with? Do you DO democracy?
Show me where Republicans are fighting "tooth and nail" against infrastructure bill.
PS, stop being dumb, please at least do it for your babies!
I asked you to SHOW me.
I already know the infrastructure bill was overloaded with pork.
That's a common tactic. Something we need gets presented, and a shit ton of pork gets added so that when the others object, they get blamed for "fighting" the needed thing.
And YOU are falling for this. And everytime you guys are asked a question like this to show your claims, you insult people. Was I insulting you?
Go ahead and show where Republicans are fighting infrastructure bill? Like the infrastructure part. Please?