NewzMax is a known propaganda site, ding-dong.
Why don't you alt-right QAnon types get back to us when you actually know something instead of barfing a bunch of wild, biased speculation and propaganda?
Just wild statements w/o an supporting evidence.
See - a perfect opportunity was offered to support specific wild claims - but nothin.
I guess the Putinist propaganda parrot puppets didn't get the details on the bullshit they sling.
The MSM - the acronym given to the Main Stream Media so many years ago by the "leftists" that alt-rights now like to use as a blanket denial of any information that doesn't come from fringe right wing sources and align with the narrative that they have been brainwashed into believing.
It's funny and sad that by rejecting MSM (which is not always guilty of evil doing) that they somehow imaging what is left in the info cesspool is the real dope and by believing it they are the people in the know. How special it makes them. Of course what it really means is that they aren't capable of wading through available sources and by their own reasoning and insight determine what is suspect and what reliable in any given situation.
That, of course, is why there wasn't one contradicting bit of evidence presented here in refutiation of the Paul/Fauci controversy as advanced.
Actual evidence - None.
Yep - they're real free thinkers all right. LoLz
They're free to think what they are told by right wing propaganda sources.
Sorry faggit, AP, CBS, MESSNBC, CNN, NPR are ALL well know liberal fake nooze outlets! PWN3D!
Look what his corporate handlers told him the claim was
"TheStory: Fauci gave money to China to develop SARS CoV2 in Wuhan which was then release upon the world killing millions, therefore he is directly responsible for those deaths and all associated havoc."
Yeah. This is how they do it.....and these dumb fucks go right along with it because they've already been trained to defend the establishment and hate their own countrymen.
What happened.....Fauci funded gain of research. Which was research to see if this bat Corona could be made transmissible to humans. There IS direct evidence of this.
Also no one has claimed it was released intentionally.
They frame it in a totally ridiculous way so it can be called false when its not what is being said.
Look how they do it here
"Although the NIH did fund a project at the Wuhan lab, there’s no proof that the coronavirus was bioengineered. Both the WorldNetDaily article and Hilton’s segment rely on a series of unsubstantiated allegations to spin a conspiracy theory about the virus being a lab creation.
WorldNetDaily has since dialed back on many of its claims, issuing three separate corrections, all of which cite scientists pushing back on the notion that SARS-CoV-2 was manmade. It has also placed a question mark at the end of the original headline. However, the bulk of the article text has not been updated."
Right. So Covid clearly wasnt man made or bio engineered. That's what they are saying is false. Okay, cool.
BUT this fully admits....as does Fauci....that yeah, the research was funded at least in part by Fauci. So the gain of function research was funded by Fauci. And that research involved seeing if bat born Corona could become infectious to humans. Which it did.
And now we have a global pandemic.
THIS article is propaganda. Its addressing claims that were not made and avoiding or minimizing the fact....that the article admitted....that Fauci DID fund the research from which we now have a pandemic.
msn is 100% pure, unadulterated lies and propaganda.
In a paper published in the
Nature journal
Scientific Reports, Australian scientists describe how they used high-performance computer modeling of the form of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the beginning of the pandemic to predict its ability to infect humans and a range of 12 domestic and
.
Their work aimed to help identify any intermediate animal vector that may have played a role in transmitting a bat virus to humans, and to understand any risk posed by the susceptibilities of companion animals such as cats and dogs, and commercial animals like cows, sheep, pigs and horses.
The scientists, from Flinders University and La Trobe University, used genomic data from the 12 animal species to painstakingly build computer models of the key ACE2 protein receptors for each species. These models were then used to calculate the strength of binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to each species' ACE2 receptor.
Surprisingly, the results showed that SARS-CoV-2 bound to ACE2 on
cells more tightly than any of the tested animal species, including bats and pangolins. If one of the
tested was the origin, it would normally be expected to show the highest binding to the virus.
"Humans showed the strongest spike binding, consistent with the high susceptibility to the virus, but very surprising if an animal was the initial source of the infection in humans," says La Trobe University Professor David Winkler.
The findings, originally released on the ArXiv preprint server, have now been peer reviewed and published in
Scientific Reports.
"The computer modeling found the virus's ability to bind to the bat ACE2 protein was poor relative to its ability to bind
. This argues against the virus being transmitted directly from bats to humans. Hence, if the virus has a natural source, it could only have come to humans via an intermediary species which has yet to be found," says Flinders affiliated Professor Nikolai Petrovsky.
KA-POWN3D!
