Thread Summary:
@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.
@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.
@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.
So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?
"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.
Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."
Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.
They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.
I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.
Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.
This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.
No one thinks it's a place for a "career".
I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.
Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.
If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.
Hold yer horses, missy, and don't be ordering me around.
Neither of us can SAY whether the opinion was ill-founded since it's a CIVIL TORT ACTION that's being advocated. It don't mean jack, unless and until SOMEONE files such a suit and the grounds are stated and the INJURY is established and the DAMAGES are named.
You already challenged me once on this EVEN THO I'm not the OP and didn't make the suggestion. And I rejected yer challenge. We're done with this subtopic, you and me. If you don't like my position, well.... as you say, it's a message board.
What position?
All you've done is try gish gallop and mouth off because Lotus said something fucking stupid and someone pointed it out.
No one can sue the NRA, even on this TORT level. I invited someone to explain how this would even be possible. Clicking your heels and repeating "tort action" doesnt answer anything.
Even with the approval of a dizt who doesnt even understand what tort action IS but tells forum people she practices law.
Dont get shitty with people because they notice pure partisan bullshit when they see it.
Maybe we can use TORT ACTION to sue the AMA everytime a post abortive woman gets an infection.
Be done if you are done. I'm not compelling you to do anything.