Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

You lost at least 20 posts ago.

What did I lose? Did you eat it, Yeast Beast?

You lost the argument the minute you asked me how many abortions I had. Idiot.

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

 

[Frood]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

You lost at least 20 posts ago.

What did I lose? Did you eat it, Yeast Beast?

You lost the argument the minute you asked me how many abortions I had. Idiot.

Nope, silly spic....

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

 

[Lily]

I'd like to see you be adult aborted in an electric chair but the ensuing grease fire might get out of hand and burn the joint down...

I wonder if democrats were ALWAYS this smug and hostile when they fought against human rights progress?

We know Democrat voters formed the KKK after slaves were freed.

They didnt vote in favor of the Civil Rights Act(won by Republicans)

PP used to forcibly sterilize black women. Now they fight against progress in how we learn about and treat human life in the womb and the resources available to women in crisis(they literally attack pro life outreaches and smear them)

They do all this awful shit out of some party loyalty thing. Not because they truly want better for the country and better for humans.

It's sad how hostile and one sided they are.

Warning: Goal Posts on Wheels!

Shush baby slayer!

Your stupid posts aren't working. You could go fuck yourself, you'd be more productive.

Silence, womb reaper...

Authoritarian fuck. Now you want me to stop posting.

I want you to get on a treadmill and run towards Mexico first! Lulz

I want you to learn to lose gracefully.

I want you to learn compositional English and how to push yourself away from the table.

I fully realize you will never learn to lose gracefully.

Will let you know if I ever lose, Chunky Bean Monkey...

You lost at least 20 posts ago.

What did I lose? Did you eat it, Yeast Beast?

You lost the argument the minute you asked me how many abortions I had. Idiot.

Nope, silly spic....

"No" is all you got?

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

 

[Dove]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

We have learned SO much about human life and human development. Our culture is so much more accepting of single moms. There is no stigma. There are thousands of groups that help. They are all stopping up in TX and I've donated and I'm helping with needs lists.

You think with everything we KNOW now, and all we know about how these places operate, and how so many women talk about coercion and pressure and grief and regret.....and again, everything we know about human development, that ANY people who care about human rights and human beings would find this unthinkable.

No these partisans keep defending it even with all the deceptive propaganda.

 

[Kirk]

Every sperm is sacred, until it enter the Texas Public School System.

Dead Covid Kids For Freedom!

What Admin calls a "sperm"

Because fuck women and fuck humans.

Leftists always have to lie and gaslight.

If your position was good? You wouldnt have to use so much BULLSHIT to "defend" it.

Now this is how we respect life Duhv style. Using an aborted fetus as a cudgel.

She's just showing you what your support of later abortions looks like...

Planned Parenthood doesn't show the women these pics for a reason...

This is not about late-term abortions. It's about limiting women's access to all abortions. If Duhv wasn't such a gaslighter, she'd be showing a 6-weeks fetus instead of a fetus from an abortion that is almost never performed, and is probably a picture from a highly illegal abortion anyway.

Fucking bullshitting, anti-woman propagandists.

Settle down, baby killer.... you're going to blow a gasket.

You're talking to the hysterical fascist, Dove, right? The one who thinks she has the right to control others' lives.

I'm not the one throwing a fit about what laws other states pass or trying to centralize everything.

So you need to learn what fascism IS.

Right being against killing humans is "controling lives" gtfo with that gaslighting bullshit.

You want to control what happens in another woman's womb for fucks sakes. Fuck off.

You think it's OK to kill babies. Fuck YOU.

For years, Freud has been schilling in this manner for "thumbs up" emotes and foot rubs. At this point, it's beyond pathetic.

Even his "fuck you" has lost its emotion; he could as well be barking like a dog at Lotus bud's post at this point.

How's the anal fingerbanging going, Poppy?

I can't even get one finger in without you giggling like a girl and clenching your asshole. Relax Freud.

 

[Frood]

Fat Oak is getting rotisseried...

 

[Holliday1881]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Infant
The word infant is commonly used as a slightly more formal word for baby (the youngest category of child).
The term infant is also used as formal/legal term for minor; that is, a child in general.
A newborn infant is known as a neonate (neonatal, neonatus) after the final stage of gestation throughout the first three months.
A human infant which is less than 28 days old is a newborn.
The term can technically also apply to premature infants and postmature infants, as well as full term newborns.

 

[Frood]

Every sperm is sacred, until it enter the Texas Public School System.

Dead Covid Kids For Freedom!

What Admin calls a "sperm"

Because fuck women and fuck humans.

Leftists always have to lie and gaslight.

If your position was good? You wouldnt have to use so much BULLSHIT to "defend" it.

Now this is how we respect life Duhv style. Using an aborted fetus as a cudgel.

She's just showing you what your support of later abortions looks like...

Planned Parenthood doesn't show the women these pics for a reason...

This is not about late-term abortions. It's about limiting women's access to all abortions. If Duhv wasn't such a gaslighter, she'd be showing a 6-weeks fetus instead of a fetus from an abortion that is almost never performed, and is probably a picture from a highly illegal abortion anyway.

Fucking bullshitting, anti-woman propagandists.

Settle down, baby killer.... you're going to blow a gasket.

You're talking to the hysterical fascist, Dove, right? The one who thinks she has the right to control others' lives.

I'm not the one throwing a fit about what laws other states pass or trying to centralize everything.

So you need to learn what fascism IS.

Right being against killing humans is "controling lives" gtfo with that gaslighting bullshit.

You want to control what happens in another woman's womb for fucks sakes. Fuck off.

You think it's OK to kill babies. Fuck YOU.

For years, Freud has been schilling in this manner for "thumbs up" emotes and foot rubs. At this point, it's beyond pathetic.

Even his "fuck you" has lost its emotion; he could as well be barking like a dog at Lotus bud's post at this point.

How's the anal fingerbanging going, Poppy?

I can't even get one finger in without you giggling like a girl and clenching your asshole. Relax Freud.

You're in Australia? You must have blown the covid quarantine guards to get through... impressive.

 

[Frood]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Infant
The word infant is commonly used as a slightly more formal word for baby (the youngest category of child).
The term infant is also used as formal/legal term for minor; that is, a child in general.
A newborn infant is known as a neonate (neonatal, neonatus) after the final stage of gestation throughout the first three months.
A human infant which is less than 28 days old is a newborn.
The term can technically also apply to premature infants and postmature infants, as well as full term newborns.

Go away, baby smotherer...

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

wait, your argument here is that the hundreds of thousands killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki where not murders?

so what were they? Graceful transitions into alternative existences?

 

[Lily]

Fat Oak is getting rotisseried...

I didn't know your other handle was "Fat Oak".

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war. And you claim to be "more American" than I am. What a joke.

 

[Frood]

Fat Oak is getting rotisseried...

I didn't know your other handle was "Fat Oak".

Your handle, Fat Oak.... you have heaps of handles hanging off you, Lard Lily...

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war.

Murder

 

[Biggie Smiles]

So basically Oak is so conditioned by the government that even murder isn't murder if they declare it is not.

No wonder she's so apt to accepting the filthy vermin scum in California sanctioning theft. As long as it's the government condoning it and it is not her being negatively impacted by it she's all for it

Jesus, Liberals never cease to make me wanna puke

 

[Lily]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war.

Murder

If it was murder, why weren't any American leaders, including military leaders dragged before the Hague?

 

[Lily]

Fat Oak is getting rotisseried...

I didn't know your other handle was "Fat Oak".

Your handle, Fat Oak.... you have heaps of handles hanging off you, Lard Lily...

What does what you allege have to do with abortion in Texas?

 

[Frood]

So basically Oak is so conditioned by the government that even murder isn't murder if they declare it is not.

No wonder she's so apt to accepting the filthy vermin scum in California sanctioning theft. As long as it's the government condoning it and it is not her being negatively impacted by it she's all for it

Jesus, Liberals never cease to make me wanna puke

Yup.... she's a mass murder apologist and baby killing donut the hutt...

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war.

Murder

If it was murder, why weren't any American leaders, including military leaders dragged before the Hague?

Murder is murder, baby killer....

It's a very simple concept.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war. And you claim to be "more American" than I am. What a joke.

Ah, I see. If you're a 17 year old being dragged across the globe to kill someone at the orders of your loathsome politicians it is not murder. But if you happen to be a conservative 17 year old kid cleaning graffiti and protecting your local town and happen to find yourself stranded alone in the middle of a violent mob of pedophiles who are pummeling you with skateboards and you kill them to defend yourself you are a murderer of the most evil sort.

Great logic Oak, really great.

You should run for something

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war. And you claim to be "more American" than I am. What a joke.

Ah, I see. If you're a 17 year old being dragged across the globe to kill someone at the orders of your loathsome politicians it is not murder. But if you happen to be a conservative 17 year old kid cleaning graffiti and protecting your local town and happen to find yourself stranded alone in the middle of a violent mob of pedophiles who are pummeling you with skateboards and you kill them to defend yourself you are a murderer of the most evil sort.

Great logic Oak, really great.

You should run for something

About 5 miles daily....

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war. And you claim to be "more American" than I am. What a joke.

Ah, I see. If you're a 17 year old being dragged across the globe to kill someone at the orders of your loathsome politicians it is not murder. But if you happen to be a conservative 17 year old kid cleaning graffiti and protecting your local town and happen to find yourself stranded alone in the middle of a violent mob of pedophiles who are pummeling you with skateboards and you kill them to defend yourself you are a murderer of the most evil sort.

Great logic Oak, really great.

You should run for something

About 5 miles daily....

If she made it 5ft without keeling over face first on the ground I'd be impressed

 

[Lokmar]

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"We hold these truths to be

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that they are endowed by their

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

with certain

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that among these are

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, it is their right, it is their duty, to

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Read it and weep, faggit ass faggit!

That is the Declaration of Independence you fuck up, that is NOT the Constitution, no mater what Duh'v may have told you, it has no more bearing on our laws than does the Liberty Bell.

Hey dummy, The Declaration of Independence is America's Founding Document!!!!!! Fukin retard!!!! PWN3D!

Actually, SuperDumerEater, no it ain't. It's a declaration of independence that does not make nor codify any laws whatsoever.

And you and I both know you're much more literate than you'd have to be, to make such a baseless claim in error.

Yer dismissed, go pwn3d yerself.

Listen here, buffoon, you libstains always wanna argue that America wasnt founded on Christianity. That aint so. The Declaration of Independence is rife with references to God and you hate it!!! We dont celebrate The birth of this nation on Sept 17th, do we? I realize you liberal shitstains dont like this historical FACT! Hell, most fuking people couldnt even tell you what year the Constitution was created, let alone what date. I had to look up the date even though I knew the year! America operated as a unified country long BEFORE the Constitution. KA-POWN3D!

John Adams:
July 3, 1776
"The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever.


"You will think me transported with enthusiasm, but I am not. I am well aware of the toil and blood and treasure that it will cost to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the gloom I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory I can see that the end is worth more than all the means; that posterity will triumph in that day's transaction, even though we [may regret] it, which I trust in God we shall not."

STFU, dumb ass!

The debate is about whether the Declaration of Independence has the force of law. It does not. You can flail and deflect all you want, you were wrong, ignoramus.

It DOES have the force of law, retard. Othewrwise, we wouldnt be The United States of America ITFP! Sheesh!

Does not. Name one court case where the DOI was cited as "case law" to win a court case.

Read it and weep, stupid ass!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Why is being wrong so important to you?

Why are FACTS! so PWN3D! to YUO? faggit!

 

[Frood]

Just a little observation, but wouldn't being "pro-woman" allow a woman to choose her course without regulating it in some authoritarian way?

.Being "pro-abortion" doesn't mean mandating abortions so clearly it isn't authoritarian.
. However - telling a woman she has no right to make that choice certainly is authoritarian.

Odd it is that some deranged people who imagine themselves small goobermint libertarian types speak in favor of government control of private affairs. They want to be left alone, but don't want to leave others alone. And,
. they fancy that they are somehow (laughably) also Classical Liberals
but contradict this claim by wanting government to impose there bullshit xtian beliefs on others
. when certainly they know that Classical Liberalism was in large part founded as a reaction to government's religious tyranny.

. Well, clearly these weak and confused minds can not comprehend these obvious contradictions in their professed philosophy.

I'm pro baby and anti murder, fart huffer!

So, you'll only adopt a baby? So, are you on a waiting list to adopt a baby? Or maybe you're willing to take in a small child, of any ethnicity, where you live?

I bet you are, you baby lover you!

Two kids...two unplanned pregnancies.... tick! Tick!

So? You can do more. You support the babies after all. There aren't many kids in foster care if you consider all the "Christian" souls that could take every unwanted child in.

I've done my bit... raising two kids I didn't initially ask for.

Besides, parents aren't mandatory... the kids are still human beings without parents.

You're not a hero for raising kids, it's your moral obligation.

And parents are imperative to the healthy upbringing of a human being. I guess you want an unending supply of homeless people to be created so that you can scorn them.

You talk of morals yet support the death of babies.... you're a peculiar Fatty.

It's not my place to control other women. Nor yours.

It's not their place for mothers to kill their babies.

Actually according to the Supreme court it is in fact their place to decide whether or not to birth a child.

Immoral ruling that will be rolled back to stop baby killing.

Opinion, not fact.

At least you're de facto admitting that it is, in fact, their place to decide because of the rule of law.

Indisputable fact: Aborting babies is baby murder.

It is legal. Murder is illegal.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were legal.... murder!

Many babies killed!

That was not an illegal war, dupe. So, it wasn't murder. It's too bad you never get tired of being wrong.

Dropping atomic bombs on civilians wasn't mass murder?

:facepalm:

No, it wasn't murder. It was war. And you claim to be "more American" than I am. What a joke.

Ah, I see. If you're a 17 year old being dragged across the globe to kill someone at the orders of your loathsome politicians it is not murder. But if you happen to be a conservative 17 year old kid cleaning graffiti and protecting your local town and happen to find yourself stranded alone in the middle of a violent mob of pedophiles who are pummeling you with skateboards and you kill them to defend yourself you are a murderer of the most evil sort.

Great logic Oak, really great.

You should run for something

About 5 miles daily....

If she made it 5ft without keeling over face first on the ground I'd be impressed

 

[Lokmar]

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"We hold these truths to be

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that they are endowed by their

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

with certain

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that among these are

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, it is their right, it is their duty, to

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Read it and weep, faggit ass faggit!

That is the Declaration of Independence you fuck up, that is NOT the Constitution, no mater what Duh'v may have told you, it has no more bearing on our laws than does the Liberty Bell.

Hey dummy, The Declaration of Independence is America's Founding Document!!!!!! Fukin retard!!!! PWN3D!

Actually, SuperDumerEater, no it ain't. It's a declaration of independence that does not make nor codify any laws whatsoever.

And you and I both know you're much more literate than you'd have to be, to make such a baseless claim in error.

Yer dismissed, go pwn3d yerself.

Listen here, buffoon, you libstains always wanna argue that America wasnt founded on Christianity. That aint so. The Declaration of Independence is rife with references to God and you hate it!!! We dont celebrate The birth of this nation on Sept 17th, do we? I realize you liberal shitstains dont like this historical FACT! Hell, most fuking people couldnt even tell you what year the Constitution was created, let alone what date. I had to look up the date even though I knew the year! America operated as a unified country long BEFORE the Constitution. KA-POWN3D!

John Adams:
July 3, 1776
"The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever.


"You will think me transported with enthusiasm, but I am not. I am well aware of the toil and blood and treasure that it will cost to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the gloom I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory I can see that the end is worth more than all the means; that posterity will triumph in that day's transaction, even though we [may regret] it, which I trust in God we shall not."

STFU, dumb ass!

The debate is about whether the Declaration of Independence has the force of law. It does not. You can flail and deflect all you want, you were wrong, ignoramus.

It DOES have the force of law, retard. Othewrwise, we wouldnt be The United States of America ITFP! Sheesh!

Does not. Name one court case where the DOI was cited as "case law" to win a court case.

Read it and weep, stupid ass!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Part of" and is American law are different, dumbass.

Sorry asshole but if the SCOTUS writes it in their decisions, its part of law. PWN3D!

 

[Lily]

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"We hold these truths to be

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that they are endowed by their

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

with certain

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, that among these are

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, it is their right, it is their duty, to

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Read it and weep, faggit ass faggit!

That is the Declaration of Independence you fuck up, that is NOT the Constitution, no mater what Duh'v may have told you, it has no more bearing on our laws than does the Liberty Bell.

Hey dummy, The Declaration of Independence is America's Founding Document!!!!!! Fukin retard!!!! PWN3D!

Actually, SuperDumerEater, no it ain't. It's a declaration of independence that does not make nor codify any laws whatsoever.

And you and I both know you're much more literate than you'd have to be, to make such a baseless claim in error.

Yer dismissed, go pwn3d yerself.

Listen here, buffoon, you libstains always wanna argue that America wasnt founded on Christianity. That aint so. The Declaration of Independence is rife with references to God and you hate it!!! We dont celebrate The birth of this nation on Sept 17th, do we? I realize you liberal shitstains dont like this historical FACT! Hell, most fuking people couldnt even tell you what year the Constitution was created, let alone what date. I had to look up the date even though I knew the year! America operated as a unified country long BEFORE the Constitution. KA-POWN3D!

John Adams:
July 3, 1776
"The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever.


"You will think me transported with enthusiasm, but I am not. I am well aware of the toil and blood and treasure that it will cost to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. Yet through all the gloom I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory I can see that the end is worth more than all the means; that posterity will triumph in that day's transaction, even though we [may regret] it, which I trust in God we shall not."

STFU, dumb ass!

The debate is about whether the Declaration of Independence has the force of law. It does not. You can flail and deflect all you want, you were wrong, ignoramus.

It DOES have the force of law, retard. Othewrwise, we wouldnt be The United States of America ITFP! Sheesh!

Does not. Name one court case where the DOI was cited as "case law" to win a court case.

Read it and weep, stupid ass!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Part of" and is American law are different, dumbass.

Sorry asshole but if the SCOTUS writes it in their decisions, its part of law. PWN3D!

They can address the concepts in the document, it doesn't make it the law. Stop being stupid. I know it suits you, but still, think of us for a minute.

 

[Kirk]

Lokmar's childish sound effects make him sound like a gamer nerd.