"All Votes Matter" "Shhh don't tell anybody, do you even Electoral College?"

[Admin.]

Give it 10 minutes, and educate yourselves. If you live in Florida, your vote is worth less than the vote in Maine. There is no one man, one vote in in an American Presidential Election

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

Watch the video, or stfu. I think America grew out of socialized voting around 1865.

 

[Seamajor]

Good idea. Try it.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

Watch the video, or stfu. I think America grew out of socialized voting around 1865.

I rarely click links and never watch videos unless its cool music. Try to put into your own words any salient points you think the video might make, otherwise I'll consider it just moar Leftist narrative bullshit.

 

[Seamajor]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

Watch the video, or stfu. I think America grew out of socialized voting around 1865.

I rarely click links and never watch videos unless its cool music. Try to put into your own words any salient points you think the video might make, otherwise I'll consider it just moar Leftist narrative bullshit.

Too bad. You might have learned something

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

Watch the video, or stfu. I think America grew out of socialized voting around 1865.

I rarely click links and never watch videos unless its cool music. Try to put into your own words any salient points you think the video might make, otherwise I'll consider it just moar Leftist narrative bullshit.

The Slave States demanded socialized voting to protect their Slave Possessions. Look it up.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

Watch the video, or stfu. I think America grew out of socialized voting around 1865.

I rarely click links and never watch videos unless its cool music. Try to put into your own words any salient points you think the video might make, otherwise I'll consider it just moar Leftist narrative bullshit.

The Slave States demanded socialized voting to protect their Slave Possessions. Look it up.

Did you learn that in an "Ethnic Studies" college course or is that the current 1619 Project-derived alter-history Leftist narrative?

 

[Joe]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

That's one of the 3 big issues, the guy that studied the system for decades found.

 

[Joe]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

That's one of the 3 big issues, the guy that studied the system for decades found.

Because the electoral college isn't split proportionally, now people wanna split up States so they can get the ev's they feel they're entitled to:



Just changing the electoral college formula would eliminate separatist movements like these overnight

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

You are wrong again Gunga Din. GTFO. States are subservient to the Federal Government, we literally fought a war over this, hit the library Jack Ass.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

You are wrong again Gunga Din. GTFO. States are subservient to the Federal Government, we literally fought a war over this, hit the library Jack Ass.

'Subservient?"

Next you'll be saying that we are all "subjects" of the Federal government.

You do understand how unAmerican that makes you sound, don't you?

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

You are wrong again Gunga Din. GTFO. States are subservient to the Federal Government, we literally fought a war over this, hit the library Jack Ass.

'Subservient?"

Next you'll be saying that we are all "subjects" of the Federal government.

You do understand how unAmerican that makes you sound, don't you?

Did you ever even take "Social Studies" in Hi School? I am constantly amazed at how little you Trumptards understand our Government and Constitution.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

You are wrong again Gunga Din. GTFO. States are subservient to the Federal Government, we literally fought a war over this, hit the library Jack Ass.

'Subservient?"

Next you'll be saying that we are all "subjects" of the Federal government.

You do understand how unAmerican that makes you sound, don't you?

Did you ever even take "Social Studies" in Hi School? I am constantly amazed at how little you Trumptards understand our Government and Constitution.

Are you a "subject" of the Federal government, Admin, or is the Federal government subject to the People?

It's a simple either/or question.

 

[Admin.]

No. There is no "one man one vote" in American Presidential elections because we are not a Democracy, we are a Representative Republic.

You whine about someone's vote in Florida being "less" than someone's in Maine, but you utterly fail to realize that were there not the Electoral College, all of the votes of everyone in the red portions of the map on the splash page of your little video would not just be of "less worth," they would be completely meaningless.

Why do you want to disenfranchise half the country in Presidential Elections?

Read a book already, Memeboy.

And yet the current setup of your Electoral College also underrepresented Republican voters like you Lokmar & Dove who live in Blue States @Reggie_Essent.

If the electoral college had been split as a proportion of state vote instead of winner take all, Trump would have been a lot closer & Republican voters in blue States would have gotten some ev's.

If 40% of Illinois voters chose Trump then they should have gotten roughly 40% of that state's electoral college votes.

That's where I see a failing in the current system. Even the losing party should get something out of it.

Some States do proportion Electoral Votes. It's up to the State Legislatures to decide And believe me, I know all about how my franchise has been stolen from me by vile and filthy criminal Registered Democrat scum. I live in Illinois, and I daresay I've never cast a ballot in this State that was not abnegated by some verminous Registered Democrat operative harvesting fraudulent ballots from nursing homes and obituaries and hobo camps and such.

This is why I call every single Registered Democrat a treasonous bastard piece of fuckng shit that should be summarily executed for being traitors to Liberty ... but that's just my personal 1st Amendment-protected opinion of Registered Democrat scum.

The overwhelming majority do not, good hustle though.

It's up to the State Legislatures. Why do you have a problem with Constitutions?

How many states exactly allow proportional electoral votes?

PS, How many Constitutions are we talking about?

First question: Google it.

Second question: All of them. State and Federal.

So again, why do you people have these problems with Constitutions? You don't seem to ever want to abide by them.

You are wrong again Gunga Din. GTFO. States are subservient to the Federal Government, we literally fought a war over this, hit the library Jack Ass.

'Subservient?"

Next you'll be saying that we are all "subjects" of the Federal government.

You do understand how unAmerican that makes you sound, don't you?

Did you ever even take "Social Studies" in Hi School? I am constantly amazed at how little you Trumptards understand our Government and Constitution.

Are you a "subject" of the Federal government, Admin, or is the Federal government subject to the People?

It's a simple either/or question.

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

 

[Admin.]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

That's your answer? You who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which is based upon the fundamental ideal of the liberty of the individual? You cannot answer whether you are a subject of the Federal government or whether the Federal government is subject to you and me and every other free American?

It's an easy question for me to answer. I am subject to no one. Subjects bend the knee and free persons do not bend the knee

Do you have callouses on your knees, Admin, or are you a free person?

 

[Admin.]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

That's your answer? You who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which is based upon the fundamental ideal of the liberty of the individual? You cannot answer whether you are a subject of the Federal government or whether the Federal government is subject to you and me and every other free American?

It's an easy question for me to answer. I am subject to no one. Subjects bend the knee and free persons do not bend the knee

Do you have callouses on your knees, Admin, or are you a free person?

How many states proportion their electoral votes, you shitbag shirker of duty?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

That's your answer? You who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which is based upon the fundamental ideal of the liberty of the individual? You cannot answer whether you are a subject of the Federal government or whether the Federal government is subject to you and me and every other free American?

It's an easy question for me to answer. I am subject to no one. Subjects bend the knee and free persons do not bend the knee

Do you have callouses on your knees, Admin, or are you a free person?

How many states proportion their electoral votes, you shitbag shirker of duty?

One less than the owl says the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop™, but that does not answer the simple question of whether you consider yourself a subject of the Federal government or not.

 

[Admin.]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

That's your answer? You who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which is based upon the fundamental ideal of the liberty of the individual? You cannot answer whether you are a subject of the Federal government or whether the Federal government is subject to you and me and every other free American?

It's an easy question for me to answer. I am subject to no one. Subjects bend the knee and free persons do not bend the knee

Do you have callouses on your knees, Admin, or are you a free person?

How many states proportion their electoral votes, you shitbag shirker of duty?

One less than the owl says the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop™, but that does not answer the simple question of whether you consider yourself a subject of the Federal government or not.

no jooooo!

 

[Admin.]

Pro Tip: Individuals do not equal states. You goofs say your hate socialism, and yet you love having the power of your vote subtracted to enhance underprivileged State's votes, ie Socialized Voting. Aren't you a proponent of letting the underprivileged die in the streets on their own merits?

No, individuals and the protection of the rights of each and every one of those free persons is the paramount ideal upon which our Founding and all of our Laws are based. The State is subservient to the people. That is what the social compact is based upon whether at the State or Federal level.

So I ask again. Are you a subject of the Federal government, or is the Federal government subject to you and me and every other free American?

... it's an easy either/or question.

If a Monkey jumped on your back, would you beat him off?

That's your answer? You who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States which is based upon the fundamental ideal of the liberty of the individual? You cannot answer whether you are a subject of the Federal government or whether the Federal government is subject to you and me and every other free American?

It's an easy question for me to answer. I am subject to no one. Subjects bend the knee and free persons do not bend the knee

Do you have callouses on your knees, Admin, or are you a free person?

How many states proportion their electoral votes, you shitbag shirker of duty?

One less than the owl says the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop™, but that does not answer the simple question of whether you consider yourself a subject of the Federal government or not.

Wurst dizmount evah!

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Damn! The irony of doing a double-post dismount while claiming the clear victor of the thread is dismounting.

Astounding, I say!

 

[Admin.]

Damn! The irony of doing a double-post dismount while claiming the clear victor of the thread is dismounting.

Astounding, I say!

Told me agin massa why the 'lectrickle collej is good for us niggra's?