Pelosi has been excommunicated!

[deport_liberals]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

At her age Hell is a very real possibility here...

 

[Lily]

Oh, the RCC needs more boys to serve at Mass, of course. It's the Roman Catholic Church thing to do. But she's denied communion.

I wonder what the Pope has to say about that.

 

[Lokmar]

I dont understand why anyone pro abort would go to church or receive communion. I also dont understand why they havent cut all these pro abort politicians off sooner. Both sides are equally hypocritical IMO.

 

[Adam]

Is the witch dead yet? I still fondly remember the lefty melties when that old k1ke Ginsberg croaked.

 

[Admin.]

If I was Madam Speaker Pelosi's Chief of Staff, I'd have Antsy Nancy march right over to St Patrick's Cathedral and hold a bible over her head for an epic photo op!

 

[Admin.]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

 

[deport_liberals]

I dont understand why anyone pro abort would go to church or receive communion. I also dont understand why they havent cut all these pro abort politicians off sooner. Both sides are equally hypocritical IMO.

The american church is terrible about this.

 

[Lokmar]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

 

[Admin.]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

 

[Lokmar]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

LOL! The church/priest hasnt stated that:
1. DUI is a mortal sin
2. DUI's should be safe and legal for anyone who wants one
3. Committing a sin negates all church leaders from implementing church rules
4. You completely ignored Pelosi belonging to an organization which by her own standards and political position is a hate group

Your whataboutism isnt even apples vs apples FFS!

 

[Dove]

If I was Madam Speaker Pelosi's Chief of Staff, I'd have Antsy Nancy march right over to St Patrick's Cathedral and hold a bible over her head for an epic photo op!

She did fine staying at home and showing off her 15 dollar a gallon ice cream while most Americans were struggling to survive.

She was much too busy destroying a small business owners life because she got busted not following the same mandates she put on everyone else.

But yeah.....a photo op in front of a church (that was later torched in a "peaceful protest") really fucked up a lot of peoples lives, you know? This is the shit we need to look at.

 

[Dove]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

Right it's a "whataboutism" when a dem/prog gets their blatant double standards/hypocrisy pointed out, right?

 

[Dove]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

LOL! The church/priest hasnt stated that:
1. DUI is a mortal sin
2. DUI's should be safe and legal for anyone who wants one
3. Committing a sin negates all church leaders from implementing church rules
4. You completely ignored Pelosi belonging to an organization which by her own standards and political position is a hate group

Your whataboutism isnt even apples vs apples FFS!

That's too deep for them. They love their false equivalences.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

Is this your way of telling us cock tastes good?

 

[Admin.]

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

How do the 3 old ladies who still post at Colostomy Bag Team feel about taxing Mosques in addition to Christian churches?


admong? Are you ladies for or against such consistency in viewpoints?

 

[Admin.]

How do the 3 old ladies who still post at Colostomy Bag Team feel about taxing Mosques in addition to Christian churches?


admong? Are you ladies for or against such consistency in viewpoints?

Be honest now, what is the most tampons you have so far been able to stuff into your mouth?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

The old ladies don’t want mosques taxed I’m guessing

 

[Lily]

“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

Hi there Mr Whataboutisms!!!

It's not a whataboutism if it's the hypocrite involved, you numbskull. Do you have a Bible Verse showing Arch Bishops are supposed act in a life endangering manner?

In Italy the child molestation is epic. Remnants of the Romans using children as sex slaves. I read an article about why the Vatican was so slow to respond and so eager to cover it up years ago. They considered sex with alter servers as sort of normal behavior...like why are people so angry, it's no big deal.

 

[Dove]

This is so ignorant.

The money people donate to the church had already been taxed.

So what you hate the fact that people have beliefs you dont agree with so you are going to take money and resources away from people who rely on it? The women and children? The homeless?

It take over a million dollars a year to run our states largest outreach. A place that literally saved MY life. And the lives of so many others. They do not receive any government funding. They run entirely on donations giving by people whose income was already taxed.

So Democrats dont want to do fuck all for other people besides trap them on state benefits where they become nothing but a number in a file, and they dont want anyone else to help people either.

I used to work the front desk and I got to hear homeless mothers, either booted out, evicted or escaping domestic abuse crying and begging me for help in the fucking winter. Sometimes they ask if we could just keep their children at night. Because we didnt have room.

So yeah Admin. What do you think the taxes would be if the state started making them run on income that's taxed TWICE? The government has to get their cut from the fucking person whose income it is, then they just get ANOTHER cut of it just because "eh fuck teh church....I dont like their beliefs so fuck the people they help"?

It's just so fucking cold. God forbid down trodden people receive meaningful, life changing help from anyone. It's so much better to have the state just do it all. Because they do such a great fucking job.

You'll just laughy face this post too because you actually care what happens to anyone else.

 

[Dove]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

So instead of a meal for someone living in their car I have to let the stupid government waste it?

 

[Lily]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

I agree with most of what you said. They should be taxed, especially since they get involved in policy.

 

[Admin.]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

You are getting closer to understanding how the economy works, you understand that a business gets taxed by government , yes? I give my post taxed dollars to Pancakes House to buy Pancakes to eat, which they in turn are taxed on, are you getting the pickshure?

 

[Dove]

So these citizens who ALREADY pay taxes have to have taxes paid out of the SAME income twice because they VOTE?

So basically unless people are secular and not religious they should pay more taxes because they vote.

We can't do any charity or outreach because we vote and we arent in line with leftist beliefs.

Got it.

 

[Lily]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

You are getting closer to understanding how the economy works, you understand that a business gets taxed by government , yes? I give my post taxed dollars to Pancakes House to buy Pancakes to eat, which they in turn are taxed on, are you getting the pickshure?

You can't make this shit up. The level of ignorance no longer astounds me.

 

[Dove]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

You are getting closer to understanding how the economy works, you understand that a business gets taxed by government , yes? I give my post taxed dollars to Pancakes House to buy Pancakes to eat, which they in turn are taxed on, are you getting the pickshure?

The church is not a business. It's an organization that does charity. Its more comparable to a club than a business. It's not taxed because it's not a business.

When you give your money to a church so it can go towards the upkeep and functioning of your church and fund your outreaches and help members who fall on hard times.....that's not buying pancakes from another business.

And BTW....I already oppose the amount of taxes we have shoved on us. The government does not use it all properly. They overspend and waste. Often on shit NONE of us agree with.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

So instead of a meal for someone living in their car I have to let the stupid government waste it?

It's the principle of the thing, dear, like my position on the medical procedure of abortion. On principle, there is no reason that religious institutions are not taxed as any other corporate entity. The reason they are not is steeped in ancient tradition and age-old power politics.

People like Admin just want to shit on churches and steal their money. There is no principle involved in his advocacy of taxing churches beyond petty political point gathering.

So, let not your heart be troubled.

 

[Dove]

I donated 30 bucks to BF. Should THAT be taxed?

 

[Dove]

I actually agree that religious institutions should be taxed. It's the principle of the thing. Of course, Democrats don't have any such principles, so they just see taxing churches as yet another way to steal money to pay other Democrats to do do-nothing government jobs, but on principle I believe churches should pay the same taxes as the rest of us.

So if I get my income taxed already it has to be taxed AGAIN if I donate it to a church?

So instead of a meal for someone living in their car I have to let the stupid government waste it?

It's the principle of the thing, dear, like my position on the medical procedure of abortion. On principle, there is no reason that religious institutions are not taxed as any other corporate entity. The reason they are not is steeped in ancient tradition and age-old power politics.

People like Admin just want to shit on churches and steal their money. There is no principle involved in his advocacy of taxing churches beyond petty political point gathering.

So, let not you heart be troubled.

It's not a corporate entity. How do you figure it's a corporate entity?

My church isnt even close to a corporate entity. And if my old church gets taxed well that's just fucking over women and children.