JD Vance - Tim Walz Debate

RFPLWgX.png
 
Where does it say that moderating doesn't include correcting lies, dick whistler?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.
Do you have that tape of Tim Walz or his supporters crying over a fact check? TIA
 
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.

Go fuck yourself, cocksucker.
 
Moderating a debate, like everything can evolve. I see no problem with a liar being called out, on any side.
 
I don't know how anyone made it past the first question (I certainly didn't).

Walz's answer was a horrific promise to continue the genocide of Palestinians and march us double-time toward world war three. Fuck that.

Vance started his "answer" by opting to assail the 8 or 10 people who had never heard of him before that night with some kind of autobiography.

*click*

Nah, dudes and dudettes. I'm not even voting for either of those jackasses so I quickly decided I ain't gonna bother listening to them make vile noises with their face holes all night.

/shrug