Iran cannot have nukes. Having a war with Iran to obliterate their nuclear capabilities is much safer than letting them have nukes. How hard is that to understand?
Iran doesn't have nukes, didn't have nukes, wasn't developing nukes. Now they may go for it. So anyway, can the US just attack any country who doesn't have nukes because it doesn't want them to have them even though they aren't even working on making them?
So how do you KNOW Iran wasn't developing nukes? The Iranians themselves declared they had about 400 kilos of 60% enriched uranium. Why would they announce that and why would they enrich to nearly weapons grade when only 20% is needed for energy usage?
China or Russia could sell Iran anything nuke related. The idea that Trump somehow made anything safer for anyone is hilarious. Matter of fact, if you believe that, I have a $150 smart phone I'll sell you for $500.
So tell me, TDS sufferers, "widely known" aside (and the cultural reference is "It is known), do you think the Jihadis that run Iran wouldn't use a nuke if they got their hands on one?