1,000,000 Post Thread

The Prowler

20k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Canada
Iran cannot have nukes. Having a war with Iran to obliterate their nuclear capabilities is much safer than letting them have nukes. How hard is that to understand?
 

Frood

30k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
5,260
Location
Wootopia
Iran doesn't and didn’t have nukes. They've never intended to have nukes. On the other hand, Israel has nukes and is a psychotic nation..
 

Holliday 3000

10+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
22
Location
Shangri La
Iran doesn't have nukes, didn't have nukes, wasn't developing nukes. Now they may go for it. So anyway, can the US just attack any country who doesn't have nukes because it doesn't want them to have them even though they aren't even working on making them?
 

Reggie_Essent

10k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,665
Location
Chicagoland
So how do you KNOW Iran wasn't developing nukes? The Iranians themselves declared they had about 400 kilos of 60% enriched uranium. Why would they announce that and why would they enrich to nearly weapons grade when only 20% is needed for energy usage?
 

mastersplither

1k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
905
Location
Alaska
China or Russia could sell Iran anything nuke related. The idea that Trump somehow made anything safer for anyone is hilarious. Matter of fact, if you believe that, I have a $150 smart phone I'll sell you for $500.
 

Reggie_Essent

10k+⚡Milestone
Reaction score
2,665
Location
Chicagoland
So tell me, TDS sufferers, "widely known" aside (and the cultural reference is "It is known), do you think the Jihadis that run Iran wouldn't use a nuke if they got their hands on one?