The Killer Covid Vaccine - Striking Side Effect

Gosh, why in the world would people be hesitant to trust the "experts" about mRNA vaccines?

It's a mystery.


Oh look, a youtube vid by the experts who predicted 62% (not 62.1 or 61.9% but precisely 62%) of people who were vaccinated would be dead in 3 years.
WoW! Blessed am I to have been among the 38% who miraculously survived.
 
See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.

Even if data or analysis is provided, the content is usually completely ignored and responded to, if you can call it that, with ad hominem or some other fallacious sleight of hand designed to derail the conversation.

Thanks for proving I was right to tell ya to go pound sand, Holli.

...and now back to your regularly scheduled programming. *click*
 
See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.

Even if data or analysis is provided, the content is usually completely ignored and responded to, if you can call it that, with ad hominem or some other fallacious sleight of hand designed to derail the conversation.
Precisely.
..and you saw Prowler work that to it's most laughable effect.
Would you care to comment on Prowler's failure?
 
Precisely.
..and you saw Prowler work that to it's most laughable effect.
Would you care to comment on Prowler's failure?

It's my policy never to interject myself when two or more people are hitting each other with their purses.

Some of those damn things have bricks in 'em, ya know.
 
Precisely.
..and you saw Prowler work that to it's most laughable effect.
Would you care to comment on Prowler's failure?
Oh, that reminds me. I want my challenge to Prowler to remain near the top of every subsequent page:

I'm and irrepressible toolbag.
...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.
It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.

Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.
 
Last edited:
Oh, that reminds me. I want my challenge to Prowler to remain near the top of every subsequent page:


...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.
It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.

Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.
Look at all those werds!

Ain't nobody gonna read all that, Holli. You gotta work on your delivery.

My take on vaccines is if you got one you're a gullible fool. If you got moar than one, you're a hopelessly dumb toolbag.
 
Look at all those werds!

Ain't nobody gonna read all that, Holli. You gotta work on your delivery.

My take on vaccines is if you got one you're a gullible fool. If you got moar than one, you're a hopelessly dumb toolbag.
..and could you take a moment to articulate your position with supporting evidence?

PS: "Trump said" does not qualify.
 
..and could you take a moment to articulate your position with supporting evidence?

PS: "Trump said" does not qualify.
Sure. I haven't had any kind of vaccine since I was 13 and had to get a tetanus shot because I stepped on a rusty nail. I'm still here. Ergo, vaccines suck and none of them were ever needed by anyone. It's just a way for Big Pharma to assfuck the public for billions of dollars.
 
Sure. I haven't had any kind of vaccine since I was 13 and had to get a tetanus shot because I stepped on a rusty nail. I'm still here. Ergo, vaccines suck and none of them were ever needed by anyone. It's just a way for Big Pharma to assfuck the public for billions of dollars.
So am I to understand the Tetani shot didn't kill you?
. You do realize this undermines your entire argument, don't you.
 
Others with take the time.

Oh fuck, if people take the time to read this stuff they will realize that the "no Covid vaccine" group is also the "higher cholesterol" level and "higher triglycerides" group.

That is all they need to know that it is a stretch to attribute their cardio vascular events to a lack of a Covid vaccine.
 
See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.

He cannot do it.

I asked him very politely what vaccine it was and he did not just answer.

Why not just answer?

Because he gets into some weird kind paranoid state where everything must be a trap!

And the way he gets so focused on insignificant things. Like this "who predicted 62% (not 62.1 or 61.9% but precisely 62%) of people". Who fuckin' cares?

And the way he gets going on typos or minor grammatical errors. Holy fuck. Imagine if his posts were scrutinized for minor grammatical errors. One discussion about a study would turn into 50 stupid arguments about his minor grammatical errors.

And now he is whining that I am not engaging with him. Figure it out, Holiday.
 
name calling and showing your desperation

Hahaha!!!

Here is our first interaction in this thread:

It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.

What vaccine specifically?
The one they were controlling for.
. Do you people need everything explained to you?

I asked a sincere question.

So could you answer it politely?

No. You got sarcastic and unpleasant.

Oh, not only that, you were wrong.

You said "The one" indicating that it was one single vaccine.

Which means you did not even know at the time, because when you looked into it, you discovered that several vaccine were used.


...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.

Take a look at your own behaviour, you oblivious fuckwit.

You act like a fuckin' goof and you are not gonna be treated well.

It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.

Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.

 
Gosh, why in the world would people be hesitant to trust the "experts" about mRNA vaccines?

It's a mystery.


I'm subbed to John Campbell, aka Covid Grandpa. It was refreshing to see him do a complete 180 degree turn and go from parroting the "safe and effective" line, to straight up saying that the vaxx is dangerous.

Not too many folks are willing to admit that they've been wrong about something and instead double down on their assertions in order to save face and keep their pride intact.
 
See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.

Even if data or analysis is provided, the content is usually completely ignored and responded to, if you can call it that, with ad hominem or some other fallacious sleight of hand designed to derail the conversation.

Thanks for proving I was right to tell ya to go pound sand, Holli.

...and now back to your regularly scheduled programming. *click*
See my previous post... Holly is too "proud" to admit that he is wrong about anything.
 
I asked him very politely what vaccine it was and he did not just answer.
I did answer. I lured you. You were gut hooked.
...and you will continue to flail and twist in the wind rather than admit your mistakes.
This is what you always do when you are upended.
Your audience is waiting to see your letter to the authors of the study listing your complaints
we await their reply and your posting of it. :LOL3: :LOL3: :LOL3:
 
No. You got sarcastic and unpleasant.
Yes. I was mocking you.
Will you ever forgive me?
All you had to do is what I had done and reference the study and you could have answered your own question.
In any case, there was nothing inaccurate in the answer given.
It was for the vaccine(s) controlled for, and what vaccine was that?
The Covid vaccine (collectively)...it's right in the study's title, and specified in the study itself.
Okay, guilty as charged...I'm mocking you again.

You aren't going to read what I wrote?
It was just a quick review of how you got suckered, easily, due to your own lack of objectivity, dug your own hole and self buried.
I was gracious enough to offer you a face-saving path - to express in writing you concerns to the authors and apparently you've declined (and that may be the only wise decision you've made) perhaps finally realizing what a fool you've made of yourself. If not...write that letter.
 
Last edited:
Check out Holiday trying to justify his incorrect response:

It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.

What vaccine specifically?

Not that I said "specifically"...


He is now claiming:

In any case, there was nothing inaccurate in the answer given.
It was for the vaccine(s) controlled for, and what vaccine was that?
The Covid vaccine (collectively)..

But this was his answer:

The one they were controlling for.

Incorrect.

There were several vaccines used.

This study is severely flawed in so many ways.


You are embarrassing yourself, Holiday.
 
Exactly.

And all I did was ask an honest and sincere question.

But your tiny brain cannot handle questions. You always think it must be a trap!!!

You paranoid little weasel.
I was mocking you for the stated reason. You attacked the study before having read it.
. You were lured and trapped.
You expressed a bias (it was already known to exist - don't you attribute every death to "the jab")
I asked that because the dangerous Covid-19 vaccines were the mRNA vaccines
Apparently you feel no need to support your bias, it's that ingrained.
Support with credible evidence that it's "dangerous".
 
I notice you are easily agitated Prowler
Prowler is an arcane type. You see, squat and robust. Something on the order of NeanderBozopithicus or the like.
.Sloped foreskull, protruding jaw.
The kind who will proudly tell you they never missed a day of work, never had a sick day, but before they reach 60 have a massive coronary or stroke. Yes, sadly he is undeveloped emotionally and can't control his frustration at being outmaneuvered.
 
Now look at the RSV vaccine numbers in the "Covid vaccine" group versus the "No Covid vaccine" group.

So what is the reasoning behind attributing the difference in Cardio Vascular events to the Covid 19 vaccine and not the RSV vaccine?

How about the higher cholesterol numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?

Or the higher triglycerides numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?

@Holliday 3000


I know that you ignored this question several times now.


Why?