- Reaction score
- 280
- Location
- Shangri La
...but boob implants....coolio, baybee.All vaccines are bad.
...but boob implants....coolio, baybee.All vaccines are bad.
Gosh, why in the world would people be hesitant to trust the "experts" about mRNA vaccines?
It's a mystery.
Precisely.See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.
Even if data or analysis is provided, the content is usually completely ignored and responded to, if you can call it that, with ad hominem or some other fallacious sleight of hand designed to derail the conversation.
Precisely.
..and you saw Prowler work that to it's most laughable effect.
Would you care to comment on Prowler's failure?
Oh, that reminds me. I want my challenge to Prowler to remain near the top of every subsequent page:Precisely.
..and you saw Prowler work that to it's most laughable effect.
Would you care to comment on Prowler's failure?
...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.I'm and irrepressible toolbag.
...and I know how you know.It's my policy never to interject myself when two or more people are hitting each other with their purses.
Some of those damn things have bricks in 'em, ya know.
Look at all those werds!Oh, that reminds me. I want my challenge to Prowler to remain near the top of every subsequent page:
...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.
It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.
Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.
..and could you take a moment to articulate your position with supporting evidence?Look at all those werds!
Ain't nobody gonna read all that, Holli. You gotta work on your delivery.
My take on vaccines is if you got one you're a gullible fool. If you got moar than one, you're a hopelessly dumb toolbag.
Sure. I haven't had any kind of vaccine since I was 13 and had to get a tetanus shot because I stepped on a rusty nail. I'm still here. Ergo, vaccines suck and none of them were ever needed by anyone. It's just a way for Big Pharma to assfuck the public for billions of dollars...and could you take a moment to articulate your position with supporting evidence?
PS: "Trump said" does not qualify.
So am I to understand the Tetani shot didn't kill you?Sure. I haven't had any kind of vaccine since I was 13 and had to get a tetanus shot because I stepped on a rusty nail. I'm still here. Ergo, vaccines suck and none of them were ever needed by anyone. It's just a way for Big Pharma to assfuck the public for billions of dollars.
I'm still pissed about that shot because I knew I didn't need it. But my mom made me get it. My dad agreed with me and told me to just rub some dirt on it.So am I to understand the Tetani shot didn't kill you?
. You do realize this undermines your entire argument, don't you.
Your mom loved you that much, dude. You lucky fuck.I'm still pissed about that shot because I knew I didn't need it. But my mom made me get it. My dad agreed with me and told me to just rub some dirt on it.
Others with take the time.
See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.
name calling and showing your desperation
It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.
What vaccine specifically?
The one they were controlling for.
. Do you people need everything explained to you?
...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.
It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.
Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.
Gosh, why in the world would people be hesitant to trust the "experts" about mRNA vaccines?
It's a mystery.
See my previous post... Holly is too "proud" to admit that he is wrong about anything.See?
That's why people often decline a serious "debate" with some rando on an internet message board.
Even if data or analysis is provided, the content is usually completely ignored and responded to, if you can call it that, with ad hominem or some other fallacious sleight of hand designed to derail the conversation.
Thanks for proving I was right to tell ya to go pound sand, Holli.
...and now back to your regularly scheduled programming. *click*
I did answer. I lured you. You were gut hooked.I asked him very politely what vaccine it was and he did not just answer.

Yes. I was mocking you.No. You got sarcastic and unpleasant.
I did answer.
Yes. I was mocking you.
It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.
What vaccine specifically?
In any case, there was nothing inaccurate in the answer given.
It was for the vaccine(s) controlled for, and what vaccine was that?
The Covid vaccine (collectively)..
The one they were controlling for.
I was mocking you for the stated reason. You attacked the study before having read it.Exactly.
And all I did was ask an honest and sincere question.
But your tiny brain cannot handle questions. You always think it must be a trap!!!
You paranoid little weasel.
Apparently you feel no need to support your bias, it's that ingrained.I asked that because the dangerous Covid-19 vaccines were the mRNA vaccines
You attacked the study
It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.
What vaccine specifically?
Prowler is an arcane type. You see, squat and robust. Something on the order of NeanderBozopithicus or the like.I notice you are easily agitated Prowler
outmaneuvered
Now look at the RSV vaccine numbers in the "Covid vaccine" group versus the "No Covid vaccine" group.
So what is the reasoning behind attributing the difference in Cardio Vascular events to the Covid 19 vaccine and not the RSV vaccine?
How about the higher cholesterol numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?
Or the higher triglycerides numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?