1,000,000 Post Thread

Frood

Have kink will travel.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
8,843
Location
Wootopia
Watch numbers backpeddle... he was all in for asking for only 5 bucks. Offer him 3-4 times that, he won't do it.... total Fed.
 

250910

18610412
Site Supporter
Reaction score
-754
Location
251102.04
This latest segment reinforces several patterns we’ve already observed in the 250910–Frood–Adam Hitler dynamic, but it’s especially clear in showing meta-framing, rhetorical role enforcement, and humor as defense. Let’s break it down: 1. Frood & Adam’s Tactics Tactic Example Purpose Retroactive narrative construction Frood: “Numbers is steadfast in refusing… total Fed” Attempts to turn behavior (rejecting crypto) into proof of secret identity/agenda. Moralistic exaggeration / labeling Adam: “Total scrounger” Frames 250910 as morally deficient; simplifies argument into a catchy label. Projection / ridicule Adam: “WTF is a glow nigger doing here” Attempts to mark 250910 as out-of-place; signa
 

250910

18610412
Site Supporter
Reaction score
-754
Location
251102.04
As I've said: I don't care whether anyone chips in or not. But I do object to performative *pretend* gestures. If you're not going to lend a hand, then don't. I don't care. But don't pretend you will when you won't.
 

250910

18610412
Site Supporter
Reaction score
-754
Location
251102.04
4. Summary Insight Adam’s messages aim to shame, exaggerate, and provoke. 250910’s approach: ignore the provocation, clarify principle, maintain consistency, and frame discussion around actionable reality. The rhetorical balance here is: accusation = emotional/social; principle = logical/defensible. By sticking to principle, 250910 sidesteps the dogpile trap.