- Messages
- 46,984
- Location
- Down by the seashore.
10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
What is the point of your question? Are claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter? Of course it matters, you fucking tool. But first things first. That child cannot be forced to bear a child. That would be a form of torture. I am willing to bet my life that law enforcement is working on arresting the lowlife slime who impregnated her. Fucking moron.
Why don't you plug that into your duck duck go machine and find out for us, you whiny fuck.10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
Why don't you plug that into your duck duck go machine and find out for us, you whiny fuck.10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter?
Most likely a member of a historically underrepresented group. Mom's boyfriend is teh father.What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter?
Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. Even if the emphasis of the article regards the horrors faced by impregnated young women who might have to drive a few hundred miles to dispose of the inconvenience, good and actual journalism would have included information as to how this poor 10-year-old child came be impreganted in the first place. If it was through abuse, incest or rape, then it would have made the point that much more poignant and effective as news analysis/editorial by showing a real-world/real time example of the ramifications that the curtailment of abortion availability might have in the States that choose to curtail them.
But the writer is just a Democrat hack stenographer and utterly incapable of thinking that hard. But he or she is clearly a Democrat so that goes without saying.
Details make a difference sometimes when trying to make a point.
10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter? Of course it matters, you fucking tool. But first things first. That child cannot be forced to bear a child. That would be a form of torture. I am willing to bet my life that law enforcement is working on arresting the lowlife slime who impregnated her. Fucking moron.
I wouldn’t be the l a bit surprised if the whole thing was fabricated.10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter? Of course it matters, you fucking tool. But first things first. That child cannot be forced to bear a child. That would be a form of torture. I am willing to bet my life that law enforcement is working on arresting the lowlife slime who impregnated her. Fucking moron.
They dont. That kid could be taken to any PP in MI by the rapist himself and no report of rape would be made.
I'd like to know the details of this case because there has been shit tons of pro abortion propaganda flying around.
I have a difficult believing that the ten year old (probably has health conditions) that pro aborts have been using as an abortion arguement for like 30 years just finally showed up on the scene a week after Roe was over turned and there is no talk about legal action. Usually when the story of a child rape victim hits the media....they talk about the actual crime. Not so much the details of the childs medical issues.
In other words? This is fake. Most would say its because the vast majority of children this young are not even able to become pregnant. I'm saying it's because of how the story was presented.
Also a distinct possibility libs started raping kids when Alito's draft was leaked.a10 years old and not a word in the article about any investigation into who fucked this child, just a sob story abut the poor child having to go all the way to Indiana to get that abortion because, you know, SCOTUS is bad like the Orange Man.
So who fucked the kid, Admin? Any approved thoughts on that?
What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter? Of course it matters, you fucking tool. But first things first. That child cannot be forced to bear a child. That would be a form of torture. I am willing to bet my life that law enforcement is working on arresting the lowlife slime who impregnated her. Fucking moron.
They dont. That kid could be taken to any PP in MI by the rapist himself and no report of rape would be made.
I'd like to know the details of this case because there has been shit tons of pro abortion propaganda flying around.
I have a difficult believing that the ten year old (probably has health conditions) that pro aborts have been using as an abortion arguement for like 30 years just finally showed up on the scene a week after Roe was over turned and there is no talk about legal action. Usually when the story of a child rape victim hits the media....they talk about the actual crime. Not so much the details of the childs medical issues.
In other words? This is fake. Most would say its because the vast majority of children this young are not even able to become pregnant. I'm saying it's because of how the story was presented.
What is the point of your question? Are you claiming that because it's not mentioned in the article, liberals think it doesn't matter?
Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. Even if the emphasis of the article regards the horrors faced by impregnated young women who might have to drive a few hundred miles to dispose of the inconvenience, good and actual journalism would have included information as to how this poor 10-year-old child came be impreganted in the first place. If it was through abuse, incest or rape, then it would have made the point that much more poignant and effective as news analysis/editorial by showing a real-world/real time example of the ramifications that the curtailment of abortion availability might have in the States that choose to curtail them.
But the writer is just a Democrat hack stenographer and utterly incapable of thinking that hard. But he or she is clearly a Democrat so that goes without saying.
Details make a difference sometimes when trying to make a point.
Is the child of the darker skinned?Leftists be like "just kill the baby and send her back to the father who is clearly raping her"
Any arrests made? No? Let's all focus on how this kid was gonna get taken to PP for a quicky abortion on the low down but now it made the news so every one can find out who these shit fucking parents are?
Might get even crazier and we might start penalizing people who get ten year olds pregnant.
These assholes think the actual tragedy here is the kid needs to go to Indianna for an abortion.....not that she is being sexual abused
THIS is why you people shouldnt be making laws and deciding the culture.
How many tragic cases you recken there are? Just this one?Boo fuckimg hoo
The one case of tragedy does not provide justification for the MILLIONS that will be about convenience
SCOTUS did the right thing. Fuck you if you don’t like it
The RW Echo Chamber has been bleating about caravans of hundreds of millions of murdering, drug dealing, raping and pillaging Mexicans for years, we're still waiting.Yes, yes I am.
Anyone care to address my question on the missing illegal children?
My question was about the children... do you know where they are?The RW Echo Chamber has been bleating about caravans of hundreds of millions of murdering, drug dealing, raping and pillaging Mexicans for years, we're still waiting.Yes, yes I am.
Anyone care to address my question on the missing illegal children?
Not everyone...This is a situation where everyone involved got screwed. Merica.
20,000 allegedly missing Children, while worrisome, is not the topic of "My own thread"Stay on topic in your own thread.