A Couple Of My Bathroom Products

Flynn

Lion Heart Diva
Avatar Hack'd
Reaction score
4,698
Location
Far from yup!
You stupid ass.
You are the one who brought up the 4th by suggesting illegal immigrants could/should be removed without benefit of due process - that they have no constitutional rights.
They do have. You can not summarily pluck a person from their home, work or the street without cause per the 4th, you fucking moron.

Lily also owned you by bringing up other Amendment's. Not ever citing the 4th Amendment.

Pick better and smarter allies.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,747
Location
Chicagoland
AI Overview

Several Supreme Court cases have established that "illegal" or undocumented aliens are entitled to due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
These rights apply within the U.S. borders, regardless of immigration status, and protect individuals from arbitrary or unjust treatment by the government. While the extent of due process can vary depending on the situation, core principles of fairness and the opportunity to be heard are guaranteed.

Here's a breakdown of key cases and principles:
  • Reno v. Flores (1993):
    Justice Antonin Scalia, in this case, stated that "it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles [immigrants] to due process of law".

  • Mathews v. Diaz (1976):
    The Supreme Court recognized that even those with unlawful or transitory presence are entitled to constitutional protection, according to LII.

  • Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei (1953):
    This case clarified that aliens who have entered the country, even illegally, are entitled to due process protections in deportation proceedings, according to LII.

  • Plyler v. Doe (1982):
    While not directly about due process, this case established that states cannot deny undocumented children access to free public education, illustrating the principle that undocumented individuals are entitled to certain protections.
The AI algorithm is written by Leftist Shitbags.

Scalia was correct in 1993, and the only "due process" required for illegal alien criminals is a "deportation proceeding" which will happen at the processing center where illegals will be sequestered until they are returned to their countries of origin.

Why is this so hard for you Leftist Filth to understand?
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,496
Location
California
The AI algorithm is written by Leftist Shitbags.

Scalia was correct in 1993, and the only "due process" required for illegal alien criminals is a "deportation proceeding" which will happen at the processing center where illegals will be sequestered until they are returned to their countries of origin.

Why is this so hard for you Leftist Filth to understand?

Yes, they have immigration courts because we have due process of law.

End of.
 
Reaction score
621
Location
The Best Location
Lily also owned you by bringing up other Amendment's. Not ever citing the 4th Amendment.

Pick better and smarter allies.
They also have application although she and I disagree on the 14th birthright clause.
You are the one who denied the 4th in your the Nazis had it right rant. That's why I brought it into discussion.

What does your precious 1952 Act say regarding birthright citizenship?