- Messages
- 47,403
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
What are you perceptions on it's purpose and necessity, were toddler's being taught bj techniques in Kindergarten, or what?It's as stupid solution looking for problem that is imaginary.Can Lily or that Galium dunce please explain why it is so important to vile and evil Registered Democrats to have the ability to introduce the subjects of human sexuality and gender fluidity to other people's children in kindergarten through the 3rd grade?
Simple question.
From the resistance to the Florida bill from you people, it is clear that that is exactly what you support.
So Admin says the Florida Bill is a "solution looking for problem that is imaginary."
If it is an imaginary problem, then why are you people (Registered Democrats) so upset about? Why do you people lie about the Bill and claim it says something it clearly doesn't?
Why Admin? why do Registered Democrats want to sexualize other people's 5-year-old children?
Can Lily or that Galium dunce please explain why it is so important to vile and evil Registered Democrats to have the ability to introduce the subjects of human sexuality and gender fluidity to other people's children in kindergarten through the 3rd grade?
Simple question.
From the resistance to the Florida bill from you people, it is clear that that is exactly what you support.
The only valid reason I see is so that they accept the children among them that might be different than they are. Someone needs to help them understand how to treat their peers in an appropriate manner in the public square.
Another pant load! Tel me, Lily, would you be OK with a radical homosexual member of GLSEN (look it up) talking to your five-year-old child about the joys of anal sex?
That's what GLSEN does in our public schools.
No one talks to children about the joys of anal sex in public school. Go blow the shit out of your ass somewhere else.
The why is it so important to you people to be able to introduce issues of human sexuality at all for other people's children between the ages of 5 through 8?
Why is it so important for such young children to be taught anything whatsoever about sexual orientation and/or gender "fluidity?"
Why. Lily? Why do you people want to get to other people's children?
I explained it to you. I fear that I cannot understand it for you.
No you didn't. You whined some pablum about "accepting children who might be different." That's why I called it a pant load. It's complete bullshit and does not address the actual equation of why it is so important to you people to be able to indoctrinate other people's young children into the Left wing view of human sexuality?
There is no "left wing sexuality" there is only human sexuality. And yes, there are a lot of ignorant people out there who will teach their children shit at home and they have to be tamed for civil society.
So you're trying to lie about how Leftist filth have politicized human sexuality when everyone can see for themselves that ALL of the "activist" perverts are Registered Democrats. Every single buttfucking one of them.
And it's interesting that you said the quiet part out loud here: that "ignorant" people who don't think like you will teach their children things you don't approve of so the State should impose YOUR ideology on other people's children.
... and you wonder why I call you Registered Democrat filth traitorous scum.
WOAH. PUMP. THE. BREAKS. GURK.
This all could have been avoided. We set a community standard of how men and women should dress and hard nosed righties refused to accept that men who are dressed like women prefer to be called “she.”
It’s the blatant intolerance of anyone who isn’t a Bible loving straight whitey that got us here. The rest is the shit show nightmare result from where I stand.
You stand in an isolated cocoon apparently. And sorry, dear, but men who dress up like women and wish to be called "she" are fucked up in the head.
It’s common courtesy that could have preserved some semblance of the societal norm.
Er, a man who dresses up as a woman and demands to be called "she" is what kind of defied societal norms, sweety.
Hate to break it to you, but social norms change since they're dynamic and not static.
Oh, I agree. But they can't be "stool-pushed" from above. Such societal change should occur naturally and incrementally, according to The People's consensus.
Note: If you need a definition of "stool-push," just ask Admin.
They are being pushed from the younger generations. I must admit at times I'm perturbed by some of the rapidly changing norms. Then I have to do some self-assessment.
I sometimes have to admit on how maybe I'm too old to embrace these changes. Other times I stand firm, for instance said individual may want be referred to as a female. Cool, doesn't do anything to harm me. However, don't give me the bullshit that transwomen have periods.
No uterus, not period, end of story.
I draw lines on those types of issues. Others, I'm willing to move the line.
Then what were your objections to the Florida Parental Rights Bill again?
As a parent ... I would object to subjects of human sexuality and gender included in the public school curricula for children between the ages of 5 and 8. If you are not a parent, then try to imagine, if you would, that you were a parent and your local school included in its curricula such materials.
You see no potential problems with this, especially with today's atmosphere of pervert activism where LGBTQRYXZ##?/* activist types hold parades every spring and toss phallus-shaped candies to the little children lining the streets?
children are already aware of their sexuality by the age 3-5
but I agree that this is not something that needs to be discussed at an elementary level… you can teach tolerance and mold them into being kind without that tho.
Perhaps I’m more tolerant because I was a cross-dresser in elementary school who wore Jimmy Z t-shirts, vans and rode a skateboard.
We learned about sexuality in 10th grade religion class and by then we were already making out and some us were having sex. The archdiocese is more concerned with appeasing the parents who pay them.
No, dear, children are not aware of their sexuality at 3-5. Their bodies simply lack the hormones to activate the drives connected to sexuality or gender identification. That is the science.
And the experience you relate sounds to be like you were what is classically referred to as a "Tomboy" and that you learned about human sexuality they way humans have learned about it from the very beginning: from other kids.
Let the kids learn about these thing organically, the way all of us who have come before learned about it ourselves.
It disturbs me that the "Left" is so disturbed because people are waking up to what has been going on in our schools for a long time with homosexual and now "transgender" activism being incorporated into the school curricula for little kids. It's not right and should be opposed by everyone who isn't insane or a pervert.
I beg to differ about kids being aware of sexual feelings in their bodies at that age. I know one of my kids noticed that water running over their genitalia in the bathtub felt pretty good.
It taught me something.
Look up the actual science of it, dear. Children between 0-5 years old simply do not and cannot have any kind of "sexual" drives operating. It is physiologically impossible. Follow the fucking Science.
I didn't say drive, did I? But what they do need is an understanding of their body at developmentally appropriate ages.
Europeans (not British) have been doing this kind of education for ages and they have the lowest rates of teen pregnancy, STIs and later sexual debut than American teens.
I don't know why you celebrate ignorance.
