- Messages
- 45,498
Is Jimmy Dore on the libtard hurtz my tummy list?
- Thread starter Biggie Smiles
- Start date
- Messages
- 4,495
- Location
- Redneckistan, USA
He's definitely not on the shitlib's Christmas card list.
There have been entire Twitter flame wars fought over whether or not Dore is "on the left", or a grifter, or etc. Even the so-called "left" media (TYT, TheHill, etc.) can't stand him even though he's worked with some of those people (TYT) in the past.
Probably because he isn't afraid to go on Tucker's show and doesn't simply regurgitate the establishment narrative or meat shield for useless politicians.
Even I don't agree with him on everything but he's right far more often than he's wrong.
There have been entire Twitter flame wars fought over whether or not Dore is "on the left", or a grifter, or etc. Even the so-called "left" media (TYT, TheHill, etc.) can't stand him even though he's worked with some of those people (TYT) in the past.
Probably because he isn't afraid to go on Tucker's show and doesn't simply regurgitate the establishment narrative or meat shield for useless politicians.
Even I don't agree with him on everything but he's right far more often than he's wrong.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 45,498
And that's the point. You believe in healthy dialogue whereas these rodents seek to shut it down all together
which of course, causes those of us with a functioning brain to wonder why that is. Why are you so interested in shutting down opposing views? I personally see value in the process of scrutiny. If nothing else, it sharpens the argument. I'd welcome it unless my argument were unsustainable to begin with.
But they seem adverse to it for some odd reason. Preferring instead to rely upon slick little phrases like non-sequitur etc etc ... which look a lot like convenient escape hatches to exit uncomfortable discussions to me
which of course, causes those of us with a functioning brain to wonder why that is. Why are you so interested in shutting down opposing views? I personally see value in the process of scrutiny. If nothing else, it sharpens the argument. I'd welcome it unless my argument were unsustainable to begin with.
But they seem adverse to it for some odd reason. Preferring instead to rely upon slick little phrases like non-sequitur etc etc ... which look a lot like convenient escape hatches to exit uncomfortable discussions to me
- Messages
- 46,077
- Location
- United states
I like Jimmy Dore and Russel Brand. For leftwing perspective.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 45,498
They are sane leftists. Leftists from more of the JFK era when being a liberal actually meant you cared for the average person
these radical idiots would make JFK turn over in his grave
- Messages
- 46,077
- Location
- United states
That's why I call them establishment cuck leftists.
Not the same thing as normal lefties.
The establishment hates us, wants actual war....doesnt tolerate opposition or challange. Normal leftists understand we are a country and people need to kinda stick togther. Find our common grounds and work with eachother for the greater good.
These other people just want destruction and hate.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 45,498
what these idiots do not realize is that we don't love the republican party. We just hate the democrats far more as they are far worse.
At least within the conservative ranks you see glimmers of hope every now and then who are willing to go against the grain. ie the 6 brave congressmen/women we just saw, John Roberts, Mike Pence and a few others who's names escape me at the moment.
Whereas you never see democrat filth break party lines to follow their conscience. Because they have no conscience
Prove me wrong.
Give me just ONE instance where Ruth Bader Ginsburg as just one example, dissented from her party norm and voted alongside conservative lines. ONE.
At least within the conservative ranks you see glimmers of hope every now and then who are willing to go against the grain. ie the 6 brave congressmen/women we just saw, John Roberts, Mike Pence and a few others who's names escape me at the moment.
Whereas you never see democrat filth break party lines to follow their conscience. Because they have no conscience
Prove me wrong.
Give me just ONE instance where Ruth Bader Ginsburg as just one example, dissented from her party norm and voted alongside conservative lines. ONE.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 45,498
