Moderators are there to moderate, not to participate as debate opponents. Good on him for calling that shit out.
Moderators are there to moderate, not to participate as debate opponents. Good on him for calling that shit out.
I like a man willing to stand up for the freedom to lie to the public for votes!Moderators are there to moderate, not to participate as debate opponents. Good on him for calling that shit out.
I like a man willing to stand up for the freedom to lie to the public for votes!
Deception builds allegiance!Free speech is about my party's God given right to lie through our teeth!
Deception builds allegiance!
In the word 'moderator', you clue-resistant leaky bag of cum.Where is that written?
Where does it say that moderating doesn't include correcting lies, dick whistler?In the word 'moderator', you clue-resistant leaky bag of cum.
"J.D. Bowman/Hamel/Vance Did Trump lose the 2020 Election?"This is the look of a man who's just shat his pants as the Reality Train comes a-barrelin' right down on him.
"J.D. Bowman/Hamel/Vance Did Trump lose the 2020 Election?"
Err durr uh uh uh, I have 3 children!"
"I"d like to Introduce my 3 Children, my oldest is Sofa, Chaise Lounge and and our youngest Davenport"What he really said is "I swallow".
, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.Where does it say that moderating doesn't include correcting lies, dick whistler?
Do you have that tape of Tim Walz or his supporters crying over a fact check? TIA, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.
See above. It's on video. Walz claims the CBP One app is supported by laws "on the books since the '90s." Vance tries to correct that, the moderators run defense for Walz.Do you have that tape of Tim Walz or his supporters crying over a fact check? TIA
Could you expand on JD Vance's claims of how Trump worked to save and improve Obamacare?See above. It's on video. Walz claims the CBP One app is supported by laws "on the books since the '90s." Vance tries to correct that, the moderators run defense for Walz.
The truth is that they are afraid of being confronted with the truth.Could you expand on JD Vance's claims of how Trump worked to save and improve Obamacare?
, ya menstrual scab. But you could've found that for yourself, if you had any real good-faith interest in knowing. And, as the video above points out, those 'moderators' were not only uninterested in correcting 'lies' -- they were actively averse to having "their guy's" lies corrected.
Speaking of rules, what about the rule of the President of the Senate performing his job in certifying the election? I think that Rule is more important than simple fact checking of a habitual liar.Moderating a debate, like everything can evolve. I see no problem with a liar being called out, on any side.