- Reaction score
- 8,761
Balenciaga also has a sicko artist that incorporates child sexuality in their campaigns
I can lock this thread if you want grimm.Balenciaga also has a sicko artist that incorporates child sexuality in their campaigns
If its done to inform and doesn't contain illegal content it's a real gauge on other people's mindsetI can lock this thread if you want grimm.
I'm so sick normies noticing briefly and then either forgetting about it or not giving a fuck. If it ever gets to the point where peedoe shit gets normalised and accepted like faggotry and troonery, I'll 100% go White Jihad.Balenciaga also has a sicko artist that incorporates child sexuality in their campaigns
Not even noon in my time zone and already we have the "outrage du jour"? Really?
It mocks all sides of the political spectrum when they get all huffy and puffy about minutiae.LOL@ "outrage du jour"
Weeg and momma are only on their 2nd plate on Mr Chan ChineseNot even noon in my time zone and already we have the "outrage du jour"? Really?
I'll alert the media.Weeg and momma are only on their 2nd plate on Mr Chan Chinese
It disappears in like 3 or 5 mins after postMy edit button is gone...
How many days, weeks or months did you spend looking for this art?
If you worked have as hard looking for a job you could be operating your own fry station by now.
This is your thread with your content and pumped up righteous indignation, you empty minded waste of time and space.That looks like a nonce allegation to me.... I wonder whether Alticus will bother enforcing the rules or not?
And add the irony of the use of the word depravity in the title by someone with a very questionable handle.This is your thread with your content and pumped up righteous indignation, you empty minded waste of time and space.
Whiny cry babies gotta whine and cry.Not even noon in my time zone and already we have the "outrage du jour"? Really?
It’s almost like the retarded op’s trap only snared they/themselves.And add the irony of the use of the word depravity in the title by someone with a very questionable handle.
Self pwns are their specialty.It’s almost like the retarded op’s trap only snared they/themselves.
Have I told you recently that you are very very stupid?Accusing me of searching for deviant CP art isn't a nonce accusation?
What art is is in the eye if the beholder. Art is about the expression of ideas or feelings.How did you arrive at that conclusion mr art critic? The painting sucks.
Your point again was?
No. There is nothing in the painting to indicate it is about Russia or Ukraine or is anything other than a poorly rendered image of an adult male getting sucked off by what appears to be a minor child.What art is is in the eye if the beholder. Art is about the expression of ideas or feelings.
In my opinion, the art suggests the human form rather than painting the human form. It seems to be about the abuse of Ukranian children by Russians. We do know that Russian forced have kidnapped Ukranian children. The painter seems to be addressing that topic.
If it was more un the style of portrait painting, jack and not abstract, then I think it would be pornographic.
It appears the artist is condemning and not celebrating the abuse of children. When we respond emotionally without thinking we become reactive like Adam.
Though disturbing, which the topic is...it should make us worry about those kidnapped children. Why have the Russians taken those children? What will become of them? Their return should absolutely be part of ending that war.
The Russians are 100% wrong on this war. This painting provides another reason to see it.
That's your opinion.No. There is nothing in the painting to indicate it is about Russia or Ukraine or is anything other than a poorly rendered image of an adult male getting sucked off by what appears to be a minor child.
It's peediophiic pornography and the deviant Jew cunt who painted it should be condemned.
Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder, Reggie!No. There is nothing in the painting to indicate it is about Russia or Ukraine or is anything other than a poorly rendered image of an adult male getting sucked off by what appears to be a minor child.
It's peediophiic pornography and the deviant Jew cunt who painted it should be condemned.
100% it's all about perception and the motivation behind the artists message or intent in presenting such a controversial topic and whether it's just an agenda to normalize child sexuality or condone itWhat art is is in the eye if the beholder. Art is about the expression of ideas or feelings.
In my opinion, the art suggests the human form rather than painting the human form. It seems to be about the abuse of Ukranian children by Russians. We do know that Russian forced have kidnapped Ukranian children. The painter seems to be addressing that topic.
If it was more in the style of portrait painting, jack and not abstract, then I think it would be pornographic.
It appears the artist is condemning and not celebrating the abuse of children. When we respond emotionally without thinking we become reactive like Adam.
Though disturbing, which the topic is...it should make us worry about those kidnapped children. Why have the Russians taken those children? What will become of them? Their return should absolutely be part of ending that war.
The Russians are 100% wrong on this war. This painting provides another reason to see it.
Admittedly, no, but the title of the painting does not refer to Russia or Ukraine, and the artist offering up such an excuse only when the painting caused controversy is clearly a cop out.That's your opinion.
You're not in her head though are you?
I noticed you feel her Jewishness is important to your “analysis” care to explain?No. There is nothing in the painting to indicate it is about Russia or Ukraine or is anything other than a poorly rendered image of an adult male getting sucked off by what appears to be a minor child.
It's peediophiic pornography and the deviant Jew cunt who painted it should be condemned.
I think in this case it's meaning is in the eye of the beholder.Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder, Reggie!
That was merely a sop to Adam. You should have realized that with your newfound mental acuity.I noticed you feel her Jewishness is important to your “analysis” care to explain?
It could be.100% it's all about perception and the motivation behind the artists message or intent in presenting such a controversial topic and whether it's just an agenda to normalize child sexuality or condone it
The Statue of Liberty Doesn’t mention or portray American slaves, And yet it’s intended message was to acknowledge the abolition of slavery in the formation of the “more perfect union”Admittedly, no, but the title of the painting does not refer to Russia or Ukraine, and the artist offering up such an excuse only when the painting caused controversy is clearly a cop out.
Plus, I've see more refined works of art created by third graders for their parent to put up on the refrigerator door.
Still brings awareness right and creates more judgemental eyes , so if your a company why employ a model that make people question the intent what is the underlying principal. What is their target audienceIt could be.
But considering she's a woman, with no dick...how often female child molesters fantasize about fellatio must be in negligible numbers.