You mean the surveillance of US citizens initiated by radical conservatives in the WH as part of the PNAC?
Otay
Americans did Not ratify the Constitution of Bush and his "Republican Terrorists" The Constitution of Bush and his "Republican Terrorists" is not the US Constitution. Their constitution is the Project for the New American Century, a project that calls for creation of an Empire, USA - at our expense.
Who really are our "adversaries"?
Bush and Cheney are part of a group who do not support the US Constitution, a group that does not protect the civil rights of Americans and a group that does not respect the goals and needs of US citizens.
That "group" is the Project for the New American Century, PNAC. Membership and support of this group and its un-American goals and ideals represent an act of treason by Bush and Cheney and others.
Membership and support of this group demonstrates who Bush and Cheney and this group really are: They are "Republican Terrorists".
The people of the U.S. have NOT ratified the Constitution of PNAC.
"Republican Terrorists" and PNAC
By Bernard Weiner Co-Editor,
The Crisis Papers, May 26, 2003
" the National Security Strategy-promulgated by the Bush Administration in September 2002 -- now included attacking possible future competitors first, assuming regional hegemony by force of arms, controlling energy resources around the globe, maintaining a permanent-war strategy, etc."
"It's all talked about openly by the neo-conservatives of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) - who now are in charge of America's military and foreign policy-and published as official U.S. doctrine in the National Security Strategy of the United States of America."
"But, in order to unleash their foreign/military campaigns without taking all sorts of flak from the traditional wing of the conservative GOP-which was more isolationist, more opposed to expanding the role of the federal government, more opposed to military adventurism abroad-
they needed a context that would permit them free rein. The events of 9/11 rode to their rescue. (In one of their major reports, written in 2000, they noted that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor.") "
" a large part of our job in the run-up to 2004 is to get this information out to those able to hear it and understand the implications of an imperial foreign/military policy on our economy, on our young people in uniform, on our moral sense of ourselves as a nation, on our constitutional freedoms, and on our treaty obligations-which is to say, our respect for the rule of law. " **