I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand, what people far more intelligent than you, would call a false equivalence.
Adam has stated you used a picture of a young child as your avatar which is a very valid question. It's creepy for you to do something like that. If you didn't already know
and YOU have stated he used a picture of you as his avatar.
But unless you are a little boy who is no older than 13 your rebuttal is nothing more than a false equivalence and makes it appear you do indeed has some level of gravity towards little boys
so do you have a affinity towards little boys? If not, why did you use a picture of one as your avatar?