Another person shot dead by ICE in Minnesota

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
So you will stand with Trump and let the illegals stay, w/o any adjustment to status @The Prowler.

Why do you want all of those illegals to stay in the country?
@Prowler. Do you want all of the illegals in the industries Trump is giving a pass to deported or not?
Reggie has put his foot down and sided with us non-corporatist Liberals in saying he doesn't. What say you on that? ...and yes when I wrote "you", you is who I meant.
. Not that I understand why a canuck gives a shit when their country is being overrun with illegal immigrant Africans.
 

mastersplither

Site Supporter
Reaction score
833
Location
Alaska
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

There's Prowler's article

Screenshot-20260216-230616-Chrome.jpg


^ but da numbers went up I'm da Prowla and I said da numbers went up look at what my article says da numbers went up because I do math and have a certificate
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
I said "Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!" (which is obviously true)

and you replied "No".
I did not reply "No" I replied:

No, agreeing is never an option in disagreeing.
...for if one agrees then they are not disagreeing.

Is that too complicated for you?
Yes, apparently it is.

When one states that if not A, then B is the only other possibility, then they are saying there is no other not A than B. No C, no D, no E, F or G. They are no allowing for a choice. That is what had been said.
I provided the quotes above.
Now STFU, ya dolt.
I'm sorry, was that too mathy logic for you. Maybe you do not have a mathy logic certificate.
When someone says the only option other than agreeing with them is a single thing, and since agreeing is not an option when disagreeing, then they are not allowing for a choice (a second option in the form of disagreement), which of course is rediculous...much as are you.

...and yes, when I wrote "you" there, it was you to whom I was referring.
 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,546
Location
Canada
Do you want all of the illegals in the industries Trump is giving a pass to deported or not?

What I want?

Since when has that been important? I live in Canada. I am not American. I do not even own land in America.

I do own shares in American companies, but that is where my voting rights begin and end as far as any American goes...

How is what I want important to the well-being of America?

It is so weird that you are worried about what I want.
 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,546
Location
Canada
There's Prowler's article

Screenshot-20260216-230616-Chrome.jpg


^ but da numbers went up I'm da Prowla and I said da numbers went up look at what my article says da numbers went up because I do math and have a certificate

"roughly constant"

Do you know what that means? That is exactly what they would say if the numbers went up a bit.


Now because Trump has secured the borders, the numbers are going down. A lot. They are not "roughly constant" like they were with Obama.
 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,546
Location
Canada
I did not reply "No" I replied:

Here, I will quote you:


Wrong answer.

Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!

That is true. It is correct. "Yes" is the appropriate response.

I'm sorry, was that too mathy logic for you. Maybe you do not have a mathy logic certificate

Says the guy who reads this...

Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!

...and says "No."

Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When someone says the only option other than agreeing with them is a single thing, and since agreeing is not an option when disagreeing, then they are not allowing for a choice (a second option in the form of disagreement), which of course is rediculous...much as are you.

You got all that out of this statement:

"Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!"

Wow. That is....kinda troubling. Are you having a stroke or something?

Hahaha!!!!


...and yes, when I wrote "you" there, it was you to whom I was referring.

Good thing you cleared that up.

And remember....

Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!
 

mastersplither

Site Supporter
Reaction score
833
Location
Alaska
"roughly constant"

Do you know what that means? That is exactly what they would say if the numbers went up a bit.


Now because Trump has secured the borders, the numbers are going down. A lot. They are not "roughly constant" like they were with Obama.

Oh yeah?

There's Prowler's article

Screenshot-20260216-230616-Chrome.jpg


^ but da numbers went up I'm da Prowla and I said da numbers went up look at what my article says da numbers went up because I do math and have a certificate

"These new arrivals were OFFSET by those returned to their home countries, those who received green cards, and natural mortality."

Hahahahahahaha

 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,546
Location
Canada
'Splitha has lost the plot.

He thinks the immigrant numbers under Obama were bang-on Net Zero because they were "roughly constant".

It is so silly.


Meanwhile, Trump is cleaning house!!!


It must suck knowing Trump is doing a better job than your hero.....
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
Here, I will
You will what? What will you do? I have quoted you saying you will, but what have you willed. I quoted you saying
"Here I will".

Says the guy who reads this...

Agreeing and disagreeing are two separate and distinct options!!!

...and says "No."

Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
..because within the context of the discussion and within the single possible answer to why someone would DISAGREE with Reggie per his quote, agreeing was not an option. We do not agree, and it ain't optional. Perifuckingod.
.I know your limited intellect can not fathom this, but it notheless be factual.
Now, preeze concern yourself with the fact that your country is being overrun by illegal immigrant Africans, since you agree (which in this specific instance is an option) that you don't matter in America.
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
I disagree with that Trump policy. Mark your calendar. There should be no special dispensations for ag corps or builders associations. Fuck them, pay Americans enough and they will take those jobs.
Bravo! You are finally getting it, Reggie. When the surplus cheap labor is removed (Prowler is on record saying surplus labor is a good thing, so glad you disagree) the value of laborers goes up, and since those laborers will be authorized to work they can speak up and not be weak and compliant like the illegal laborer. Now, Reggie, you are beginning to understand the evils of corporate welfare in the form of cheap foreign labor. Wages will improve (why I say search terms for my philosophy on immigrant labor should include wage suppression), working conditions and benefits will improve because workers will have leverage that they do not at present.
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
. Now, speaking of amnesties for illegals which is nothing but an inducement to enter the country illegally and lay low till the next one is given: (Thanks Mr RayGun)

The first major amnesty for undocumented immigrants in the USA was enacted in 1986 through the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(IRCA), signed by President Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986. This law granted legal status to nearly 3 million people who had lived in the U.S. since January 1, 1982.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,116
Location
Chicagoland
Bravo! You are finally getting it, Reggie. When the surplus cheap labor is removed (Prowler is on record saying surplus labor is a good thing, so glad you disagree) the value of laborers goes up, and since those laborers will be authorized to work they can speak up and not be weak and compliant like the illegal laborer. Now, Reggie, you are beginning to understand the evils of corporate welfare in the form of cheap foreign labor. Wages will improve (why I say search terms for my philosophy on immigrant labor should include wage suppression), working conditions and benefits will improve because workers will have leverage that they do not at present.
Again, stupid, we are waaaay beyond the "end corporate welfare" stage of the illegal migration crises where ending the incentive structure that attracted so many inferior foreigners in the first place.

The illegal foreigners are here, now, and we are in the stage of removing them ALL pursuant to Federal Law.

If you are opposed to ICE and Border Patrol performing their missions, than that can ONLY mean you WANT all these illegals to remain and be given amnesty and Democrat Voting cards.

It means you are a traitor to America and should be spat upon.

Ain't no two ways around it.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,116
Location
Chicagoland
. Now, speaking of amnesties for illegals which is nothing but an inducement to enter the country illegally and lay low till the next one is given: (Thanks Mr RayGun)

The first major amnesty for undocumented immigrants in the USA was enacted in 1986 through the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(IRCA), signed by President Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986. This law granted legal status to nearly 3 million people who had lived in the U.S. since January 1, 1982.
And Reagan was wrong. It only made the problem worse, as you point out.

@Reggie_Essent

Which one? Which one has your smoke stack fired up?:

italy-women-team-1024x683.jpg
The middle one. Cortina is her name, I think. She has a very fine ass.
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
If you are opposed to ICE and Border Patrol performing their missions, than that can ONLY mean you WANT all these illegals to remain
No, see Reggie, you keep repeating this and Prowler has unwittingly aided in my proving how wrong you are.
. The fact is that labor migrates to where the grass is greener. If the well is dry, and the grasses brown, they leave. This is historically true in the US. Illegal laborers leave regularly, based on the market. Take away their employment and bennies options and they leave.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,116
Location
Chicagoland
No, see Reggie, you keep repeating this and Prowler has unwittingly aided in my proving how wrong you are.
. The fact is that labor migrates to where the grass is greener. If the well is dry, and the grasses brown, they leave. This is historically true in the US. Illegal laborers leave regularly, based on the market. Take away their employment and bennies options and they leave.
And as I keep pointing out, your outdated arguments regarding labor vis a vis the illegal migrant debate aren't really salient these days.

We have 30+ million illegal migrants in this country today, more than 10+ million coming in just during the 4 years of the Biden Administration. They didn't all come here to pick vegetables for two bucks an hour. Many of them came here for the freebies - healthcare, housing, SNAP and countless other social safety net programs designed for Americans that none of them contributed towards.

Look at the Somali "community" in Minnesota. Over 80% are on welfare after more than a decade here in the US, and it looks like some of them have defrauded the taxpayers out of billions of dollars.

And then there's the issue of criminality. Many millions of these illegal foreigners are straight up criminals. Do you think they stopped being criminals to hang out in Home Depot parking lots looking for jobs? No. They're still doing crime right here right now.

Did you know that the crime rates in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua have fallen on the order of 70%+ since they all exported all their criminals here? You can look it up. Trump wasn't lying when he said they emptied their prisons and mental asylums.

But you don't want ICE or BP to round them up because you think punishing the corporate moneypigs will somehow magically make all the illegal foreign nationals go back home.
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
But you don't want ICE or BP to round them up because you think punishing the corporate moneypigs will somehow magically make all the illegal foreign nationals go back home.
I have already said that the locals can and should take care of criminals involved in criminal activities. That's what they are for...to protect and serve, or is that an antiquated notion? ...and
as also stated, if they are here illegally then no goobmint handouts, fucking period.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,116
Location
Chicagoland
I have already said that the locals can and should take care of criminals involved in criminal activities. That's what they are for...to protect and serve, or is that an antiquated notion? ...and
as also stated, if they are here illegally then no goobmint handouts, fucking period.
Sure, but the problem there is that in Democrat run "Sanctuary" jurisdictions the "locals" will not cooperate with Federal Agencies like ICE and BP who are charged with removing illegal aliens, so we end up with situations like Minneapolis.

How would you address that situation?

As for the goobermint freebies, your mouth says one thing out of one side and another thing out of the other when you stand with the side that wants the illegals to stay here.

Oh, and that ass is too large. That chick needs to tighten up them glutes.
 
Last edited:

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
Sure, but the problem there is that in Democrat run "Sanctuary" jurisdictions the "locals" will not cooperate with Federal Agencies like ICE and BP who are charged with removing illegal aliens, so we end up with situations like Minneapolis.

How would you address that situation?
I have. #1, I have never been a fan of sanctuary cities...ever...for obvious reasons - and the Demotards know this from my many many communications imploring them to not condone them.
. 2) If there are no illegals, who then would a sanctuary city be sanctuary to?
...and 3) the young woman is the epitome of female beauty. Larry agrees.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,116
Location
Chicagoland
I have. #1, I have never been a fan of sanctuary cities...ever...for obvious reasons - and the Demotards know this from my many many communications imploring them to not condone them.
. 2) If there are no illegals, who then would a sanctuary city be sanctuary to?
...and 3) the young woman is the epitome of female beauty. Larry agrees.
1) Sanctuary districts are unconstitutional and violate the Supremacy Clause. Every single Democrat who pulled these political stunts should be prosecuted.

2) See number 1

3) No. Her ass is too big and will blow up as large as Lily's after dropping a kid or two. Larry must be old Herman in disguise.
 

Lotte Skoring

Site Supporter
Reaction score
420
Location
Center Court
Every single Democrat who pulled these political stunts should be prosecuted.
They should be thrown out of the party for being anti-Liberal and supporting corporate welfare. Absolutely.
.This is all part of the reason I abandoned that party by the late 80s/early 90s.

PS: You have such a mod sensibility when it comes to feminine beauty. I had no idea you were so modernified.