The Killer Covid Vaccine - Striking Side Effect

Novavax is not an mRNA vaccine.
Yes, I know. I read it. I took note of it.
. Were vaccines that were mRNA tested. Yes.
Had you asked the question you probably meant to ask (were ALL of the vaccines tested mRNA) then I would have answered "No, the Novavax was/is not.
I'm sure that is just a difference between Canuck and American English though.

There is no information on this.

So, did they give the vaccine to the guys who exercise a lot and eat well?

And the out-of-shape potato chip lovers did not get the vaccine?
"We specified a randomized target trial"
Since as we have seen I don't speekie der Canuckian so good, maybe random has a different meaning in Canada than here in the USofA. Maybe you are right, it's possible in randomizing they selectively chose the people with better health habits to receive the Covid Vaccine (NOS - because the study was of Covid Vaccines) and took the ol-timers who had terminal illnesses and 6 months to live to go without.

Now, had it been a study of people who has taken the vaccine or refused it by their choice, as so many other studies showing better outcomes for the vaccinated had, and since it is the smarter, wiser people, who likely have healthier hippie-like lifestyles and aren't conservatards who were vaccinated, then...I don't know, maybe that would skew the results, but no - that isn't how the study was conducted.

PS: "Among those in the COVID-19 vaccine group, 228 330 (65.4%) received the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna); 118 932 (34.1%), the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech); and 1823 (0.5%), other COVID-19 vaccine types (Novavax or unlabeled). All vaccines were 2024 to 2025 formulations."
 
Last edited:
Jokes aside, you're trolling with this pro-vax garbage, right?

Big pharma wants us "useless eaters" dead, that includes you and your jewish ex-wife, unless she has connections to 33 degree Freemasons.
 
Jokes aside, you're trolling with this pro-vax garbage, right?

Big pharma wants us "useless eaters" dead, that includes you and your jewish ex-wife, unless she has connections to 33 degree Freemasons.
You know, as I've mentioned and explained times a many in the past...I am not a big fan of the AMA/FDA/Big Pharma cabal.
. I take no mantanance drugs of any kind. I've practice good diet and nature's remedies for ailments, done extreme experimentation with raw foods and fasting etc etc. (Us real Liberal hippie types don't fuck around with fadism) I truly despise the practice of return customer assurance the allopathic medical system engages in....
... YET....
If I have a headache I'm not adverse to taking an Advil.
The one thing these yahoos do excel at is what I call battlefield medicine.
Their remedies can be fast acting and life saving in extreme emergencies.
Not to see that and take advantage of it is to be a blockhead.
Madam, Where would Blitzkrieg have been w/o uppers, dude?
Maybe...maybe you would prefer to live in a world ravaged by polio and smallpox,
if so we will just have to resign ourselves to a disagreement.
 
Last edited:
Jokes aside, you're trolling with this pro-vax garbage, right?

Big pharma wants us "useless eaters" dead, that includes you and your jewish ex-wife, unless she has connections to 33 degree Freemasons.
I’m curious Scouse, how would a door monitor know this? Let me guess, you got it from a Jew , or someone gay? You make it sound like everyone here has an ex Jewish wife. Such an effort to be such a racist
 
Yes, I know. I read it. I took note of it.
. Were vaccines that were mRNA tested. Yes.
Had you asked the question you probably meant to ask (were ALL of the vaccines tested mRNA) then I would have answered "No, the Novavax was/is not.
I'm sure that is just a difference between Canuck and American English though.

You are your stupid word games.

The point is that you were not able to properly scrutinize the methodology of the study and/or the information they released.

This is what I initially asked:

It says the "2024-2025" vaccine.

What vaccine specifically?

Why did you not just answer at that time?

Because you did not even think to ask the question.


"We specified a randomized target trial"

Now look at the RSV vaccine numbers in the "Covid vaccine" group versus the "No Covid vaccine" group.

So what is the reasoning behind attributing the difference in Cardio Vascular events to the Covid 19 vaccine and not the RSV vaccine?

How about the higher cholesterol numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?

Or the higher triglycerides numbers in the "No Covid 19 vaccine" group?


Obviously "random" does not always result in two equal groups.

There are so many things you could look at to explain the higher cardio vascular events, but for some reason you and the Covid-19 vaccine junkies ignore everything else....


Maybe you are right, it's possible in randomizing they selectively chose the people with better health habits to receive the Covid Vaccine

"Maybe" I am right?

Maybe!!?!?!?!

No, you idiot. I am right. There is no question.


For someone who always wants to argue semantics, why would you use the word "maybe" when it is a 100% clear fact?
 
You know, as I've mentioned and explained times a many in the past...I am not a big fan of the AMA/FDA/Big Pharma cabal.
. I take no mantanance drugs of any kind. I've practice good diet and nature's remedies for ailments, done extreme experimentation with raw foods and fasting etc etc. (Us real Liberal hippie types don't fuck around with fadism) I truly despise the practice of return customer assurance the allopathic medical system engages in....
... YET....
If I have a headache I'm not adverse to taking an Advil.
The one thing these yahoos do excel at is what I call battlefield medicine.
Their remedies can be fast acting and life saving in extreme emergencies.
Not to see that and take advantage of it is to be a blockhead.
Madam, Where would Blitzkrieg have been w/o uppers, dude?
Maybe...maybe you would prefer to live in a world ravaged by polio and smallpox,
if so we will just have to resign ourselves to a disagreement.
The point I am making is that the people who are currently making the vaccinations can't be trusted. Western big pharma, much like just about every other institution, has been subverted and infiltrated by a hostile entity which does not have the best interests of the public at heart. Heck, they don't even try hiding the contempt they have for us.
 
Many vaccines come with somewhat harsh side effects. From my own experience the Covid shot was one of the worst & perhaps the most painful. I can believe that it caused at least a few deaths & permanent life altering damage for others.
 
Last edited:
So... the people who were more susceptible to adverse events have already been culled and now they're touting the genetic resilience of the remaining guinea pigs patients as an advancement?

Yeah good okay.
Good call right there. It does sound like another flawed study that doesn't take into account that the population being measured isn't a random or representative sample of the general population because as you said, many of the suseptible ones aren't around anymore to be tested and show how resiliant they are to a heart attack because they've been buried.

I also get why the individuals who replied antagonistically to your post can't grasp the concept. These marginal individuals who possess limited intelligence ARE in fact representative of the general population of regulars on this forum.
 
You are your stupid word games.
I am? I thought you were.

Why did you not just answer at that time?
To lure you in, and also to suggest in that way that you bother to read the study you were discrediting.
That's why I linked it.

Obviously
Here's what's obvious: you have never conducted a study and you have no idea (as I had previously suggested) what randomness is. If all of those "suspicious" differences did not exist then it would be proof that the study had no real life randomness and was in fact statistically "out o control". You would know that if you had any real life experience with statistical analysis. It is the variation which proves the randomness. Clearly the people who conducted the study are more qualified than a maytag repairman in their field, yet here you are, Einstein of the Internets, pointing out that they forgot to filter critical data in drawing their conclusions.

"Maybe" I am right?
Now uh, even a retard like you should recognize when they are being mocked.
 
The point I am making is that the people who are currently making the vaccinations can't be trusted. Western big pharma, much like just about every other institution, has been subverted and infiltrated by a hostile entity which does not have the best interests of the public at heart. Heck, they don't even try hiding the contempt they have for us.
I don't always either. I thought I had mentioned that.
.You know, to maintain credibility you have to have some actual accomplishments.
The trick for you to learn is to recognize when those are/or will be.
 
The Bait
You are your stupid word games.

The Bite
I am? I thought you were.

You cannot control yourself!

Hahaha!!!!


To lure you in

Well, you certainly lured me into showing you some deficiencies in the study that you posted.


you have no idea (as I had previously suggested) what randomness is.

Yeah, my honours degree in Applied Mathematics w/Computer Science is evidence of that. Hahaha!!!


"out o control"

Hey!!!

Word Game Guy made a typo!!!

Should I make a big deal out of it like he would do?!?!!?!?

No.

That would make me the bozo instead of him.


Blah blah blah differences blah blah blah statistical blah blah blah you are Einstein blah blah blah

Hahaha!!!

Just admit defeat.

The study did not prove that any Covid-19 vaccine improves cardio vascular health.

As others have pointed out, Big Pharma can finance any number of studies with a randomized selection of subjects and eventually one will give results that seem to support their narrative.

And there will always be fuckwits (like you) who are not smart enough to understand the deficiencies of the study. Even when the deficiencies are explained to them.
 
Holiday-3000

Are you retarded?

I'm not exactly sure but I don't think you can ask a retarded person if they're retarded and get a decent answer.

It's sort of like asking a person who is asleep if they're really asleep.

All you can get is a no, or nothing.
 
I don't always either. I thought I had mentioned that.
.You know, to maintain credibility you have to have some actual accomplishments.
The trick for you to learn is to recognize when those are/or will be.
Sorry to break it to you Holly, but the elites consider you lefties to be useless eaters too, not just us evil neo-Nazis.
 
I don't think people should vaxx excessively especially when there is no actual pandemic at the moment. Vaxxing is more like a break glass in case of emergency measure.

Anyway over vaxxing makes absolutely no sense because whatever they're injecting in your veins atm may not protect you when the next pandemic comes along as it might be a completely different virus vaxxers are preparing for.
 
especially when there is no actual pandemic at the moment

Senile @Joe

You should not wait until there is a pandemic to vaccinate.

You should vaccinate before there is a pandemic.

That was part of the problem with the way Covid-19 was handled.

But who listens to the real experts when Big Pharma can just show you a study?

 
Senile @Joe

You should not wait until there is a pandemic to vaccinate.

You should vaccinate before there is a pandemic.

That was part of the problem with the way Covid-19 was handled.

But who listens to the real experts when Big Pharma can just show you a study?


Vaxx with what Prowler?

How could people prepare for covid back in 2020 when there was no vaccine available yet?
 
Vaxx with what Prowler?

How could people prepare for covid back in 2020 when there was no vaccine available yet?

Fuck off you stupid fuck.

It is dumb fuckers like you who are to blame for the continual new strain/variants of the Covid-19 virus.

Only extremely high risk people should have vaccinated once there was a pandemic. Having healthy people vaccinate during a pandemic is idiotic.


This is what an idiot would say:
I don't think people should vaxx excessively especially when there is no actual pandemic at the moment. Vaxxing is more like a break glass in case of emergency measure.

That is you, Senile @Joe.
 
You cannot control yourself!
...yet you are the one flailing, name calling and showing your desperation - that's your white flag...always has been.
It's your desperation to WIN and bias which flings your objectivity into the sewer, and allows you to dig the hole for yourself that you are ultimately buried in.
.I could ask you if there is anything, anything at all, which could be presented to you shining a positive light on Covid vaccines and if you were honest you'd have to say no. Therefore I know that any time anyone brings up the subject you will be the first to splash in and wallow in your own shit. You jumped right in making a series of blunders, making a complete fool of yourself starting straight off with trying to criticize the study, a study which judging by the title anyone might see is in regard to Covid Vaccines not one specific vaccine. Then you ask a question which I mockingly answered quite correctly knowing the information you claimed was absent and therefore flawed the study, was indeed right there presented in full detail. . ...but hey you knew it was flawed right straight off, right. That's how I knew you just knee jerked a criticize w/o even bothering to understand what the study was about or having read it. Hole dug. All that was left was to shove you in it (or let you willingly jump in) and backfill it. All done.
...but hey, here I am explaining this to a person that needs multiple strangers on the internet to inform him that carpets are ECRA sites from the day they are installed.
...or/and
a person so inconsistent of mind that they ridicule men who dress like adults in a gentlemanly way, call them gay, but proudly flaunts their own lookatme automotive fashions. Nothing gay there.
Oh btw on the subject of entry level sports vehicles, it's summer here, as it is elsewhere, and the time is right for prancing down the boulevard. So wouldn't you know I've see many many a C8 in a multitude of rainbow colours (much like those of the gay pride flag), though thus far not pink - though rest assured for the summer is o'er I will see a pink one with a Mary Kay logo on the door.

Anyway, here's how let's leave this:
. Since you truly believe the study is seriously flawed, you write to the group who produced it, a letter enumerating your concerns point for point...1, 2, 3, 4 etc, publishing that here.
Then when they reply (assuming they don't just have a good chuckle about it over biscuits and tea) you will publish their reply...again here for us all to read.
If you don't then there will be no reason to think your are not just trolling.
...and since troll = retard, one way or t'other, your a retard.
 
Last edited: