You're Nobody till the NSA is Spying on You

[Holliday1881]

...and this furious nobody is so desperate to be a big somebody that he's willing to lie about it.
...LoLz at the Tuck

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Tensions are reportedly high between Fox News host Tucker Carlson and network executives after they have failed to support his claims that the National Security Agency spied on him.

Carlson is "furious" with Fox News executives "for not backing him up" after he alleged the NSA spied on him and was seeking to get his show taken off the air"


Oh but wait, waaaaait a minute. Maybe just mayyyyybe the NSA has something on FauxNews executives
so they are setting up theTuck as the sacrificial lamb.

Yeah....Yeah, that's the ticket.

 

[Dove]

Uummmm.....they were.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So which camp are you in? The denial one or the "he deserved it" one?

Always funny seeing what the new definition of authentic liberal is.

 

[LotusBud]

...and this furious nobody is so desperate to be a big somebody that he's willing to lie about it.
...LoLz at the Tuck

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Tensions are reportedly high between Fox News host Tucker Carlson and network executives after they have failed to support his claims that the National Security Agency spied on him.

Carlson is "furious" with Fox News executives "for not backing him up" after he alleged the NSA spied on him and was seeking to get his show taken off the air"


Oh but wait, waaaaait a minute. Maybe just mayyyyybe the NSA has something on FauxNews executives
so they are setting up theTuck as the sacrificial lamb.

Yeah....Yeah, that's the ticket.

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Faux was setting him up. Tucker is certifiable, and he is wrong 85% of the time, but 15% of the time, he strikes out at the powers that be and gets a little closer to the truth than Faux cares to go, so they may want him gone. I mean, he has people like Jimmy Dore and Glenn Greenwald on his show, and they are far left progressives with a penchant for chasing the truth. That has to piss Faux off.

I do not put anything past the NSA.

 

[Dove]

...and this furious nobody is so desperate to be a big somebody that he's willing to lie about it.
...LoLz at the Tuck

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Tensions are reportedly high between Fox News host Tucker Carlson and network executives after they have failed to support his claims that the National Security Agency spied on him.

Carlson is "furious" with Fox News executives "for not backing him up" after he alleged the NSA spied on him and was seeking to get his show taken off the air"


Oh but wait, waaaaait a minute. Maybe just mayyyyybe the NSA has something on FauxNews executives
so they are setting up theTuck as the sacrificial lamb.

Yeah....Yeah, that's the ticket.

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Faux was setting him up. Tucker is certifiable, and he is wrong 85% of the time, but 15% of the time, he strikes out at the powers that be and gets a little closer to the truth than Faux cares to go, so they may want him gone. I mean, he has people like Jimmy Dore and Glenn Greenwald on his show, and they are far left progressives with a penchant for chasing the truth. That has to piss Faux off.

I do not put anything past the NSA.

I disagree with you calling Tucker certifiable and wrong THAT often. But the rest is exactly right.

Anyone throwing stones at the monoparty establishment becomes a target. Tucker has a very large base, and he will have anyone on and he will give his base the opportunity to hear things the corporate media doesnt want people to hear.

An "authentic" liberal would be pissed about the NSA and these gov orgs that regulate and violate our civil rights.

Shit libs like H think anything is fine if it happens to people he disagrees with and that gov/corporate media is always right and people are liars. He will align with the machine at the end of the day.

 

[Holliday1881]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

 

[Dove]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

Right.

YOU dont like him because he says things you dont like that dont align with your beliefs.

So if corporate media slams him, they are right and he is wrong and if he isnt wrong he deserved it. Let's hear that narcissist prayer again, H. Only people who agree with you tell the truth, the rest are just liars cuz you say so, and their civil liberties dont matter. Your personal shitty opinions of others is the truly important thing here in your head.

Like I said, at the end of the day your alliance is with the monoparty establishment. EVEN as they squash and destroy our civil liberties while propagandizing the public. Useful idiot.

 

[Holliday1881]

Say, anyone seen that hot air bag Duhv?

. If you do, axe her how the detailing of those 40 murders committed by BLM is coming along.
Seems to me she should have posted it by now, unless
she's okay with me never reading or replying to her posts.
..I suppose from her view it's better that I not refutiate and undermine all of her crackbrain
unbiased "perspectives".

 

[Dove]

The difference is that I had John Stewart's back here.



You know why? Because my stances are not rooted in hatred for Americans with different political opinions. My stances are rooted in American values, and individual liberties and rights.

You don't care one bit about individual rights as long as you believe it's only the civil liberties of people you just hate being squashed.

You applaud a one party authoritarian government as long as they were going after people you disagree with and hate.

You just spew shit that is either a blatant ignorant lie(Trump was a wanna be dictator) and have nothing to back it up except your OPINIONS, or you just pull bullshit excuses out of your ass for why it's okay for people you just personally hate to have their civil liberties squashed.

Admin agrees with you, too. He also defended the Feds/ATF burning women and children alive because David K might have been sexually abusing them.

You guys cant really call yourselves "authentic" liberals because your position are completely opposite of the liberal order of the country. This is why the term "shit libs" exists.

And when confronted with your statist anti liberal bullshit, you just act like a bratty ass child and spew a mindless and bitter response like that one.

That's why I've said when we lose our country and our liberties, and people like you realize that impacts and applies to us ALL(cuz they dont gaf about you and your childish need to feel superior) I'm not gonna feel one bit bad for the only pricks in this country who DESERVE what they supported happening. Your selfish "contempt" for others will come right back to you.

 

[LotusBud]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

 

[Dove]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

You probably dont get it because you have false preconceived ideas about conservatives that you wont get past and you dont really try to understand any stances outside your own. You wont try to see what's happening outside of the progressive perspective that allows the views of others to make sense. And there is no way through that, apparently. You have very stiff and dogmatic beliefs about people who are not progressive that are just not true and were propagated to you. Such as we are all bigots, racists, uninformed and closed minded....which ironically has made you very closed minded to hearing any of us.

You guys show up with a premise about us and you only focus on things that can confirm your existing biases. Anytime any one of us has tried to interact with what you guys claim or say, you guys jump to anger and insults.

It makes perfect sense to the rest of us why Tucker would have these guests.

 

[Holliday1881]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

 

[LotusBud]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on, or maybe the clips are edited.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

 

[Holliday1881]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

She got mine and would again.

 

[LotusBud]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

She got mine and would again.

Yeah, mine, too. *sigh*

 

[LotusBud]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

She got mine and would again.

I was disappointed she didn't run in 2020, but she was probably still worn out from all the shit they put her through in '16.

 

[Holliday1881]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

She got mine and would again.

I was disappointed she didn't run in 2020, but she was probably still worn out from all the shit they put her through in '16.

You know, one of the things I laugh at when these "stole ahlekshun" yahoos start with the where did all the extra votes for Biden come from (more than Clinton got), and I mean aside from the massive registration campaigns of both parties, is that the great majority of people who had voted 3rd party, broke for Biden - or one might say, against Trump and putinism. There was very little 3rd party voting compared to 2016, and Trump Democraps swung back.
....and THAT...is the Big Truth.

 

[Oerdin]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

 

[LotusBud]

Oh, please - the guy is a self aggrandizing pig.

. The only truth about him is his need for perpetual adulation,
and a drama queening persecution complex.

That is true, but like I said, he has some good progressive guests on there, and I don't think Faux likes it. You can't dismiss the truth tellers he has on his show just because he's a turd. Why does he bring those people on? I find that to be an interesting sort of disconnect on his part. I don't get it.

Anyway, good for him for bringing them on, whatever his reasons. Fox viewers need to hear the truth from somewhere.

I remember the time he had Jill Stein on. He was with 2 other FauxNews toadies, and I guess the idea was that between the three of them they could run enough interference that Jill's comments wouldn't get through. Man, was he wrong. She made mush of them, but certainly the idea was to discredit her - that's why she was on. Didn't work out so well for theTuck who was left so beaten down he could barely muster
a little whimper by the end. Hilarious stuff.

I don't watch Tucker, except when he has on someone I want to hear. In the clips I watch, he always allows them to speak, which I appreciate. Maybe he has changed his ways since he had Stein on.

Yes, Stein is one smart cookie. I can't believe she didn't get at least 5% of the votes. Such a disappointment.

She got mine and would again.

I was disappointed she didn't run in 2020, but she was probably still worn out from all the shit they put her through in '16.

You know, one of the things I laugh at when these "stole ahlekshun" yahoos start with the where did all the extra votes for Biden come from (more than Clinton got), and I mean aside from the massive registration campaigns of both parties, is that the great majority of people who had voted 3rd party, broke for Biden - or one might say, against Trump and putinism. There was very little 3rd party voting compared to 2016, and Trump Democraps swung back.
....and THAT...is the Big Truth.

There is also a huge fissure in the Con party: Trumpers and anti-Trumpers. Plenty of the anti Cons prolly voted for COn-light Biden.

 

[LotusBud]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

 

[Holliday1881]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

What NSA thread that is in recent use? I never heard of it so it can not be "copy cat".
This is specifically about Tucker etc and where will takes it.

Not all threads, even when superficially about the same subject, amount to the same conversation.
Thread merging is silly.

 

[Lokmar]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

 

[LotusBud]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

What NSA thread that is in recent use? I never heard of it so it can not be "copy cat".
This is specifically about Tucker etc and where will takes it.

Not all threads, even when superficially about the same subject, amount to the same conversation.
Thread merging is silly.

Odorin is just trying to control the political discourse. He's having a hissy fit.

 

[Holliday1881]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

You know - prior to 2016 I was going to write Snowden in as my vote - he and Chris Hedges.
. Later when he ran to Putin, and much info was released through Assange, another Putin operative working to get Trump elected, I was happy to have change my vote to Stein.

 

[Holliday1881]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

What NSA thread that is in recent use? I never heard of it so it can not be "copy cat".
This is specifically about Tucker etc and where will takes it.

Not all threads, even when superficially about the same subject, amount to the same conversation.
Thread merging is silly.

Odorin is just trying to control the political discourse. He's having a hissy fit.

He got his lil girl panties in a bunch for some reason.

 

[LotusBud]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

You know - prior to 2016 I was going to write Snowden in as my vote - he and Chris Hedges.
. Later when he ran to Putin, and much info was released through Assange, another Putin operative working to get Trump elected, I was happy to have change my vote to Stein.

I'm not sure I believe that about Assange. But it's a fucking tangled web for sure.

 

[Holliday1881]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

You know - prior to 2016 I was going to write Snowden in as my vote - he and Chris Hedges.
. Later when he ran to Putin, and much info was released through Assange, another Putin operative working to get Trump elected, I was happy to have change my vote to Stein.

I'm not sure I believe that about Assange. But it's a fucking tangled web for sure.

Yeah - just an oversight that he didn't have dirt to release on either Trump or Putin.

 

[Admin.]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

LOL!

 

[LotusBud]

The NSA spies on everyone and everything. Thats already been established by Snowden. No doubt they've given extra scrutiny to reporters and especially ones from Fox.

You know - prior to 2016 I was going to write Snowden in as my vote - he and Chris Hedges.
. Later when he ran to Putin, and much info was released through Assange, another Putin operative working to get Trump elected, I was happy to have change my vote to Stein.

I'm not sure I believe that about Assange. But it's a fucking tangled web for sure.

Yeah - just an oversight that he didn't have dirt to release on either Trump or Putin.

Well, Assange released what he got, didn't he? Who sent the shit to him? My guess is a Dem operative (or con spy in the dem camp) was willing to rat Hillary out, but there wasn't one who sent shit on Trump. They prolly didn't know how to work the computer.

 

[Oerdin]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

What NSA thread that is in recent use? I never heard of it so it can not be "copy cat".
This is specifically about Tucker etc and where will takes it.

Not all threads, even when superficially about the same subject, amount to the same conversation.
Thread merging is silly.

Odorin is just trying to control the political discourse. He's having a hissy fit.

You live a rich fantasy life. Threads which copy the topic of existing threads should be merged. It keeps the forum clean and forces the dumb asses to actually use existing threads if we already have that topic.

 

[Dove]

This is a copy cat thread. Can some mod please merge this with the existing NSA thread? Thanks.

Sure. After they merge ALL of the CRT whinge threads. And ALL the homeosexuality freak out threads.

What NSA thread that is in recent use? I never heard of it so it can not be "copy cat".
This is specifically about Tucker etc and where will takes it.

Not all threads, even when superficially about the same subject, amount to the same conversation.
Thread merging is silly.

Odorin is just trying to control the political discourse. He's having a hissy fit.

You live a rich fantasy life. Threads which copy the topic of existing threads should be merged. It keeps the forum clean and forces the dumb asses to actually use existing threads if we already have that topic.

Well she claims Tucker is insane and wrong 85 percent of the time, but admits she only watches when it's someone she wants to hear.

These people think slams and smears against us are gospel truth and none of us can speak and if we speak in ways that confuse them.....they never question their own bias and false premise.

It's like talking to walls.