1,000,000 Post Thread

[Lily]

I can counter everything you say. YOu are full of shit and not worth arguing with.

 

[Lily]

Who said I was joyous? I'm neutral.

 

[Jim Beam]

@Courier Six I read a thread about that here. seems pretty nasty

 

[250910]

Argumentum ad lapidem. "What claim?" Stale.

 

[Lily]

I'm cautiously optimistic but also very aware of how many stupid people there are in this country.

 

[250910]

"Not worth arguing with!" = "I have no argument to make."

 

[Jim Beam]

ok lily. Counter this. Did you support the justices who elected to dismiss the dozens of election fraud cases brought before them in 2021 ?

 

[Lily]

Later, punks.

 

[250910]

See ya, Shamu!

 

[Jim Beam]

is it just me or is it a blanket statement to say "later, punks" to everyone that has been involved in discourse with you and expect a single person in that group NOT consider themselves lumped in with the group of punks?

 

[Jim Beam]

is it just me or does this person struggle with english?

 

[250910]

Not English, just basic cognition.

 

[Jim Beam]

that is becoming pretty obvious with each passing moment

 

[Jim Beam]

@Courier Six you seem like someone who understood my question

 

[250910]

Like Kamala Harris: If she lacks a scripted response, she's forced to improvise -- and things like improvisation and extemporaneous conversation are just not in her wheelhouse.

 

[250910]

Refresh me as to the question.

 

[250910]

Do you mean re: the 'punks' exit line? Agreed. She was throwing in the towel, but concealing it behind faux disdain.

 

[Jim Beam]

I asked lily if she supported the justices who dismissed the dozens of cases brought before them concerning election fraud based on technicalities such as standing. I feel they missed a golden opportunity to shore up confidence in our election systems and I therefore blame them and those who supported them for the deep mistrust we see today

 

[Jim Beam]

they are all partly culpable for jan 6th in my opinion

 

[250910]

Agreed. They had a sterling opportunity to lay the matter to rest, and refused -- rather than failed -- to do so.

 

[Jim Beam]

that simple question seems to have upset her greatly

 

[Jim Beam]

exactly @Courier Six

 

[Jim Beam]

so anyone who supported their actions whether it benefited them or not has to look inside of themselves and realize they too are partly to blame

 

[250910]

As for the J6 "event" itself -- it has been established as fact that there were Fed provocateurs in the crowds. It is also a visually (as in, filmed) documented fact that those who entered the Capitol buildings did so peaceably and in compliance and cooperation with Capitol police.

 

[Jim Beam]

but I have noticed this is a difficult thing for democrats to do

 

[Jim Beam]

and some republicans

 

[250910]

That's simply because a disconcerting number of members of the GOP are not, in fact, Republicans. I point to personages such as the late John McCain, both Cheneys, Adam Kinzinger, and others.

 

[Jim Beam]

but at the end of the day the courts could have said to themselves "fuck it" we let a hoax which cost the american taxpayer 34 million to proceed so let us investigate this matter deeply so as to put the matter to rest once and for all. for the good of us all

 

[Jim Beam]

and anyone who cheered their decision not to is part of the problem. Whether they are intelligent enough to see this for themselves or not

 

[250910]

It's no longer as clear-cut as 'Democrats' and 'Republicans'. The real parties are the machine versus the people and our representatives. This is why Trump has attracted a coalition of figures as diverse as Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr., Ron Paul, and more. Because the lines are shifting.