- Messages
- 13,438
- Location
- Canada
A good discussion was started....
Actually, humans are animals.
Science.
And while humans, like all animals, are capable of change with the right conditions, different breeds (races) of people will exhibit, on average, a propensity toward different behaviours.
That is also science.
But some people cannot seem to have a rational discussion about it.
Is that because it is not politically correct to talk openly and honestly about it?
Or is it because these people are honestly denying scientific facts?
"Independent organizations have published statistics based on hospital records showing pit bulls are responsible for more than half of dog bite incidents among all breeds despite comprising 6% of pet dogs."
They only represent 6% of all pet dogs but are responsible for 50% of all dog bites. It's not irrational to look at this breed in askance.
LOL do you apply this logic to violent crime statistics, which suggest that black people have a tendancy to commit crime?
No, people aren't dogs, dumb fuck.
What difference does that make?
Should behavioural patterns only be recognised among animals and not humans?
A huge difference. Human's aren't animals and capable of change with the right conditions, moron.
Actually, humans are animals.
Science.
And while humans, like all animals, are capable of change with the right conditions, different breeds (races) of people will exhibit, on average, a propensity toward different behaviours.
That is also science.
But some people cannot seem to have a rational discussion about it.
Is that because it is not politically correct to talk openly and honestly about it?
Or is it because these people are honestly denying scientific facts?