You idjits have been whinging about 2020 for almost five years now. Time to get as much as you give. Cheaters.Funny, I thought 'Election Denialismalismalism iz baaaaad'. So is it? Or isn't it?
So was it okay for the past five years and okay now? Or was it a problem for the past five years and a problem now?You idjits have been whinging about 2020 for almost five years now. Time to get as much as you give. Cheaters.
I don't know. Which is it for you?So was it okay for the past five years and okay now? Or was it a problem for the past five years and a problem now?
Trump was crying about the 2106 election years before 2016.You idjits have been whinging about 2020 for almost five years now. Time to get as much as you give. Cheaters.
Trump was right about that fat pig.
So, you're hot for Rosie? LMAO.Trump was right about that most delicious woman I’ve ever laid my eyes on! pig.
You’re a better poster when you’re not posting.So was it okay for the past five years and okay now? Or was it a problem for the past five years and a problem now?
I agree with you entirely on this one. So tell me what I'm agreeing with.I don't know. Which is it for you?
Trump was right about that most delicious woman I’ve ever laid my eyes on! pig.
If only you could suppress the voices of the opposition, right?You’re a better poster when you’re not posting.
You're right, she does sound silly, BUT, she still has a point. I haven't seen anyone questioning the interesting sweep of the swing states, which wasn't predicted by anyone anywhere that I recall.I read the article. When people like O'Donell say these things, it sounds silly.
She doesn't sound like a serious person.
The answer to that isn't complicated or mystifying, really.You're right, she does sound silly, BUT, she still has a point. I haven't seen anyone questioning the interesting sweep of the swing states, which wasn't predicted by anyone anywhere that I recall.
Actually, you think YOU'RE part of the majority, but you're not.The answer to that isn't complicated or mystifying, really.
Ready?
You think you're part of the majority. But you're not.
The majority of Americans aren't psychotically anti-American bigots residing in Europe. Dunno if you're aware of that, seems like you missed it.Actually, you think YOU'RE part of the majority, but you're not.
Democrats are Communists lacking only balls enough to be open about it, so yeah, you're a Democrat.I actually AM part of the majority -- neither CON nor Democrat,
This much is true. You're a supporter of the American Aristocracy.and not a supporter of Trump.
Wow.The majority of Americans aren't psychotically anti-American bigots residing in Europe. Dunno if you're aware of that, seems like you missed it.
Democrats are Communists lacking only balls enough to be open about it, so yeah, you're a Democrat.
This much is true. You're a supporter of the American Aristocracy.
He’s as cuckoo as Ragey, he just doesn’t present as much bitterness.Wow.
I know, right?Wow.
You mean unelected officials like Musk?I know, right?
The Fourth Branch of the U.S. Government: The Aristocracy. You know all those unelected officials? You notice who's shielding them? Federal judges.
Other unelected officials.
And I know you love it. :)
If that's a problem concerning Musk, it's a problem concerning the rest of them. If it's not a problem where they're concerned, it's not a problem where he's concerned, either.You mean unelected officials like Musk?
You're right, she does sound silly, BUT, she still has a point. I haven't seen anyone questioning the interesting sweep of the swing states, which wasn't predicted by anyone anywhere that I recall.
You clearly know nothing about me, you clown. I do not support the status quo, and I especially do not support unelected billionaires of any persuasion running the government. I had massive complaints about the Clinton administration, and plenty about how Obama just blithely carried on with all the BULLSHIT Bush/Cheney pulled, so don't give me shit about my supporting the "aristocracy." You are speaking from a black hole of ignorance. But don't get me wrong. I believe that Musk is the most dangerous member of the oligarchy ever to insert himself in DC. The fact that you are an apologist for him shows the levels of both your hypocrisy and your stupidity. It's pathetic.If that's a problem concerning Musk, it's a problem concerning the rest of them. If it's not a problem where they're concerned, it's not a problem where he's concerned, either.
Principio, non homini.
You clearly know nothing about me, you clown. I do not support the status quo, and I especially do not support unelected billionaires of any persuasion running the government. I had massive complaints about the Clinton administration, and plenty about how Obama just blithely carried on with all the BULLSHIT Bush/Cheney pulled, so don't give me shit about my supporting the "aristocracy." You are speaking from a black hole of ignorance. But don't get me wrong. I believe that Musk is the most dangerous member of the oligarchy ever to insert himself in DC. The fact that you are an apologist for him shows the levels of both your hypocrisy and your stupidity. It's pathetic.
I think he is worse than Reggie, because @The Question honestly and truly thinks he's intelligent. LMAO.He puts words in our mouths then screams about it. Never you mind he made it all up in his head, but there we go. He is probably worse than Reggie. There's a tinge of bitterness to him that even Reggie can't pull off.
Notice how angry they got about having that called out. Fascinating.I notice neither Lily nor Lotus addresses TQ's point regarding unelected bureaucrats and unelected Judges as they rail against unelected Elon Musk.
Interesting what people choose to ignore sometimes.
Notice how angry they got about having that called out. Fascinating.I notice neither Lily nor Lotus addresses TQ's point regarding unelected bureaucrats and unelected Judges as they rail against unelected Elon Musk.
Interesting what people choose to ignore sometimes.