- Messages
- 46,751
- Location
- United states
Everything here that we think is so important.....it will all be like a silly dream that we dont even care to remember.
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
You can see you have never even opened a Bible... the Sadducees asked Jesus the same question.... google Matthew 22: 29-30
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
Well you are assuming we will be as we are here. Scripture says we will have glorified bodies. That our physical bodies are like a seed husk we shake off.
And the realm of God exists outside of time. Time doesnt exist there. We cant fathom an existence free of time. We have no way to comprehend that.
God ordained marriage as a reflection of the covenant between Christ and His church(the body of believers....not like the church as we understand it being buildings and everyone inside. The Bride of Christ is the believers in Christ....those purchased by His shed blood). That's what marriage is a reflection of.
So in the realm of God....we will be different. Free from sin. In glorified (and ageless) bodies, and our relationship to eachother will be perfect. Different than here, but perfect.
And what about the animals! Is there a doggo and kitteh heaven?
Of course there is. Look at all the animals and life God created.....God loves animal life ♡ they all belong to Him.
There will be animals we have probably never seen and we be able to communicate with all of them.
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
You can see you have never even opened a Bible... the Sadducees asked Jesus the same question.... google Matthew 22: 29-30
I never claimed to have.... what was the answer, oh wise one?
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
I am not going to heaven...hths
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
Well you are assuming we will be as we are here. Scripture says we will have glorified bodies. That our physical bodies are like a seed husk we shake off.
And the realm of God exists outside of time. Time doesnt exist there. We cant fathom an existence free of time. We have no way to comprehend that.
God ordained marriage as a reflection of the covenant between Christ and His church(the body of believers....not like the church as we understand it being buildings and everyone inside. The Bride of Christ is the believers in Christ....those purchased by His shed blood). That's what marriage is a reflection of.
So in the realm of God....we will be different. Free from sin. In glorified (and ageless) bodies, and our relationship to eachother will be perfect. Different than here, but perfect.
And what about the animals! Is there a doggo and kitteh heaven?
Of course there is. Look at all the animals and life God created.....God loves animal life ♡ they all belong to Him.
There will be animals we have probably never seen and we be able to communicate with all of them.
You ever see the twilight zone episode called "The Hunt"
It deals with dogs and heaven and is really good.
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
No, I don't expect you to change your style ... and of course, you have not. If you have to ask what the point of my post was, you're not trying very hard to understand it. And of course you do understand that all the references to my asshole were figurative.
What do you suppose Jesus meant to suggest when he said "the kingdom of God is HERE?"
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
No, I don't expect you to change your style ... and of course, you have not. If you have to ask what the point of my post was, you're not trying very hard to understand it. And of course you do understand that all the references to my asshole were figurative.
What do you suppose Jesus meant to suggest when he said "the kingdom of God is HERE?"
This is the kind of Dove post that makes my asshole slam SO PAINFULLY SHUT that none of you could drive a six penny nail up it with a 28 ounce framing hammer.They think that "beliefs" "faiths," whatever you want to call it is unscientific.
They don't believe God created the universe, they think it magically happened. The Big Bang Theory.
Actually, it's the other way around, Cas. Magic is when some invisible dude in the sky snaps his fingers and things pop into existence.
Science just says, "We're still looking into this remarkable occurence. We'll keep you posted as further developments arise."
We dont believe in a "magic dude in the sky" though.
Or invisible dude. Or wizard or fairy or old man
People who believe in God dont think like that. That's what people who dont believe in God insist and its ridiculous.
It's really NOT the other way around. When one of us says there is a God.....you already dont know what we are saying and you have your constructs ready(sky fairies...mold men in the sky) rooted in religion/sentiment and tradition.
God isnt even a male.......but all things male and female come from Him. He is neither and both simultaneously.
You need to understand who and want God IS to someone who believes to properly have that discussion. Many many of you think the invisible dude in the sky is some go to.
If you create a fantasy and say "hey....this is a fantasy"......no shit! Lol.
We arent arguing a magic dude. We are the source of life itself. Tell us where life came from with out a source and why we dont see other planets teaming with it. If you like the alien seeding.....who seeded the seeders? What IS life with out God?
Even macro evolution is just a second cause theory. It doesnt even touch the big questions.
I would bet God caused a pretty big bang when He started speaking things into existence. It isnt magic at all. Magic would be this suddenly happening by itself with no prompting or guiding and we have never ever witnessed life arising from nonlife. We see life coming from life.
Don't get me wrong; I agree with a lot of Dove's thoughts. And I don't want to argue with any of you about the existence and nature of the Godhead, the fucking Source from whence all of this reality (both physical and metaphysical) emanates and to whence it probably returns. And I realize that in saying that I probably give some clues to my own PERSONAL reality, which is mine to enjoy and struggle with, not any of yours.
No, my only intent here is to say why so many Dove posts make my asshole slam shut.
I think it's a lot more about style, than about content.
You see, when Dove argues her words seem to come out of a personal thinking style in which (on the table in front of HER) there are two boxes. One is labeled THEY and the other is labeled US. I have those two boxes also, in front of me, but I also have a third box labeled ME and a fourth box labeled YOU.
Thus, when I read a Dove post I must first do a lot of head scratching to try and comprehend the way her pronoun usages prevent me from understanding what she is trying to say. And even if I am charitable in my decisions to sort her thoughts into my FOUR boxes, I will then find that in trying to respond to her using my boxes, she will most typically not understand what I am saying but will instead try and jam my pronouns into her TWO boxes. And then we'll be off into a pointless discussion where we are basically NOT speaking the same language. I at least can see the congruences of thought as far as the content of the discussion goes, but mostly she will view me as an ideological adversary even when I have clearly stated that we are not.
I don't know how to fix this. At times I've thought it's just a well executed TROLL, but she's so fucking EARNEST that it's hard for me to take such a jaundiced view.
Can anyone help me, or should I just go back to not reading her posts?
so you do you fat slob, that's why you cry about them all the time. Who do you think you're kidding, cow?This is the kind of Dove post that makes my asshole slam SO PAINFULLY SHUT that none of you could drive a six penny nail up it with a 28 ounce framing hammer.They think that "beliefs" "faiths," whatever you want to call it is unscientific.
They don't believe God created the universe, they think it magically happened. The Big Bang Theory.
Actually, it's the other way around, Cas. Magic is when some invisible dude in the sky snaps his fingers and things pop into existence.
Science just says, "We're still looking into this remarkable occurence. We'll keep you posted as further developments arise."
We dont believe in a "magic dude in the sky" though.
Or invisible dude. Or wizard or fairy or old man
People who believe in God dont think like that. That's what people who dont believe in God insist and its ridiculous.
It's really NOT the other way around. When one of us says there is a God.....you already dont know what we are saying and you have your constructs ready(sky fairies...mold men in the sky) rooted in religion/sentiment and tradition.
God isnt even a male.......but all things male and female come from Him. He is neither and both simultaneously.
You need to understand who and want God IS to someone who believes to properly have that discussion. Many many of you think the invisible dude in the sky is some go to.
If you create a fantasy and say "hey....this is a fantasy"......no shit! Lol.
We arent arguing a magic dude. We are the source of life itself. Tell us where life came from with out a source and why we dont see other planets teaming with it. If you like the alien seeding.....who seeded the seeders? What IS life with out God?
Even macro evolution is just a second cause theory. It doesnt even touch the big questions.
I would bet God caused a pretty big bang when He started speaking things into existence. It isnt magic at all. Magic would be this suddenly happening by itself with no prompting or guiding and we have never ever witnessed life arising from nonlife. We see life coming from life.
Don't get me wrong; I agree with a lot of Dove's thoughts. And I don't want to argue with any of you about the existence and nature of the Godhead, the fucking Source from whence all of this reality (both physical and metaphysical) emanates and to whence it probably returns. And I realize that in saying that I probably give some clues to my own PERSONAL reality, which is mine to enjoy and struggle with, not any of yours.
No, my only intent here is to say why so many Dove posts make my asshole slam shut.
I think it's a lot more about style, than about content.
You see, when Dove argues her words seem to come out of a personal thinking style in which (on the table in front of HER) there are two boxes. One is labeled THEY and the other is labeled US. I have those two boxes also, in front of me, but I also have a third box labeled ME and a fourth box labeled YOU.
Thus, when I read a Dove post I must first do a lot of head scratching to try and comprehend the way her pronoun usages prevent me from understanding what she is trying to say. And even if I am charitable in my decisions to sort her thoughts into my FOUR boxes, I will then find that in trying to respond to her using my boxes, she will most typically not understand what I am saying but will instead try and jam my pronouns into her TWO boxes. And then we'll be off into a pointless discussion where we are basically NOT speaking the same language. I at least can see the congruences of thought as far as the content of the discussion goes, but mostly she will view me as an ideological adversary even when I have clearly stated that we are not.
I don't know how to fix this. At times I've thought it's just a well executed TROLL, but she's so fucking EARNEST that it's hard for me to take such a jaundiced view.
Can anyone help me, or should I just go back to not reading her posts?
You read her posts?!
so you do you fat slob, that's why you cry about them all the time. Who do you think you're kidding, cow?This is the kind of Dove post that makes my asshole slam SO PAINFULLY SHUT that none of you could drive a six penny nail up it with a 28 ounce framing hammer.They think that "beliefs" "faiths," whatever you want to call it is unscientific.
They don't believe God created the universe, they think it magically happened. The Big Bang Theory.
Actually, it's the other way around, Cas. Magic is when some invisible dude in the sky snaps his fingers and things pop into existence.
Science just says, "We're still looking into this remarkable occurence. We'll keep you posted as further developments arise."
We dont believe in a "magic dude in the sky" though.
Or invisible dude. Or wizard or fairy or old man
People who believe in God dont think like that. That's what people who dont believe in God insist and its ridiculous.
It's really NOT the other way around. When one of us says there is a God.....you already dont know what we are saying and you have your constructs ready(sky fairies...mold men in the sky) rooted in religion/sentiment and tradition.
God isnt even a male.......but all things male and female come from Him. He is neither and both simultaneously.
You need to understand who and want God IS to someone who believes to properly have that discussion. Many many of you think the invisible dude in the sky is some go to.
If you create a fantasy and say "hey....this is a fantasy"......no shit! Lol.
We arent arguing a magic dude. We are the source of life itself. Tell us where life came from with out a source and why we dont see other planets teaming with it. If you like the alien seeding.....who seeded the seeders? What IS life with out God?
Even macro evolution is just a second cause theory. It doesnt even touch the big questions.
I would bet God caused a pretty big bang when He started speaking things into existence. It isnt magic at all. Magic would be this suddenly happening by itself with no prompting or guiding and we have never ever witnessed life arising from nonlife. We see life coming from life.
Don't get me wrong; I agree with a lot of Dove's thoughts. And I don't want to argue with any of you about the existence and nature of the Godhead, the fucking Source from whence all of this reality (both physical and metaphysical) emanates and to whence it probably returns. And I realize that in saying that I probably give some clues to my own PERSONAL reality, which is mine to enjoy and struggle with, not any of yours.
No, my only intent here is to say why so many Dove posts make my asshole slam shut.
I think it's a lot more about style, than about content.
You see, when Dove argues her words seem to come out of a personal thinking style in which (on the table in front of HER) there are two boxes. One is labeled THEY and the other is labeled US. I have those two boxes also, in front of me, but I also have a third box labeled ME and a fourth box labeled YOU.
Thus, when I read a Dove post I must first do a lot of head scratching to try and comprehend the way her pronoun usages prevent me from understanding what she is trying to say. And even if I am charitable in my decisions to sort her thoughts into my FOUR boxes, I will then find that in trying to respond to her using my boxes, she will most typically not understand what I am saying but will instead try and jam my pronouns into her TWO boxes. And then we'll be off into a pointless discussion where we are basically NOT speaking the same language. I at least can see the congruences of thought as far as the content of the discussion goes, but mostly she will view me as an ideological adversary even when I have clearly stated that we are not.
I don't know how to fix this. At times I've thought it's just a well executed TROLL, but she's so fucking EARNEST that it's hard for me to take such a jaundiced view.
Can anyone help me, or should I just go back to not reading her posts?
You read her posts?!
You're a fat insufferable pig, change your dietShe's a repetitive boring cunt, change my mind.
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
No, I don't expect you to change your style ... and of course, you have not. If you have to ask what the point of my post was, you're not trying very hard to understand it. And of course you do understand that all the references to my asshole were figurative.
What do you suppose Jesus meant to suggest when he said "the kingdom of God is HERE?"
My answer would be biblical so I dont know if you really want me to answer that?
What do you think He meant?
You're a fat insufferable pig, change your dietShe's a repetitive boring cunt, change my mind.
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
No, I don't expect you to change your style ... and of course, you have not. If you have to ask what the point of my post was, you're not trying very hard to understand it. And of course you do understand that all the references to my asshole were figurative.
What do you suppose Jesus meant to suggest when he said "the kingdom of God is HERE?"
My answer would be biblical so I dont know if you really want me to answer that?
What do you think He meant?
Jesus is the King of God's Kingdom so when he was saying the "Kingdom is here," he was talking about himself and I assume his followers at that time...
Am I supposed to feel bad that my belief about existence and my confidence in it fail to make your man pussy moist? I mean what was the point of this post? You want to burn me at the state for heresy?
Maybe dont read my posts if they impact you so intensely. I don't want to cause a prolapse.
No, I don't expect you to change your style ... and of course, you have not. If you have to ask what the point of my post was, you're not trying very hard to understand it. And of course you do understand that all the references to my asshole were figurative.
What do you suppose Jesus meant to suggest when he said "the kingdom of God is HERE?"
My answer would be biblical so I dont know if you really want me to answer that?
What do you think He meant?
Jesus is the King of God's Kingdom so when he was saying the "Kingdom is here," he was talking about himself and I assume his followers at that time...
who gives a fuck what a fat slob like you believes?You're a fat insufferable pig, change your dietShe's a repetitive boring cunt, change my mind.
Didn't convince me, I still believe she's a repetitive boring cunt. Do better.
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
Well you are assuming we will be as we are here. Scripture says we will have glorified bodies. That our physical bodies are like a seed husk we shake off.
And the realm of God exists outside of time. Time doesnt exist there. We cant fathom an existence free of time. We have no way to comprehend that.
God ordained marriage as a reflection of the covenant between Christ and His church(the body of believers....not like the church as we understand it being buildings and everyone inside. The Bride of Christ is the believers in Christ....those purchased by His shed blood). That's what marriage is a reflection of.
So in the realm of God....we will be different. Free from sin. In glorified (and ageless) bodies, and our relationship to eachother will be perfect. Different than here, but perfect.
And what about the animals! Is there a doggo and kitteh heaven?
Of course there is. Look at all the animals and life God created.....God loves animal life ♡ they all belong to Him.
There will be animals we have probably never seen and we be able to communicate with all of them.
You ever see the twilight zone episode called "The Hunt"
It deals with dogs and heaven and is really good.
When I was a little girl I saw an episode of the Twighlight Zone that involved a doll coming to life and it terrified me so much I never watched another one LOL.
I'll check it out though.
a faggot like you could use his asshole being completely shut for a chance.This is the kind of Dove post that makes my asshole slam SO PAINFULLY SHUT that none of you could drive a six penny nail up it with a 28 ounce framing hammer.
Imagine being granted eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and being housed nextdoor to Caskur....
Nightmare!
We will all be without any sin.... made completely pure and perfect.
No one is gonna be bummed if we recognize anyone when we get there lol.
Here's a scenario which does cast doubt on the whole afterlife thing for me.....
Let's say that a man and woman are married. The woman unfortunately dies, in a car crash or something, in her 30's.
The guy is obviously devestated but eventually gets over his loss and re-marries a few years later.
They both live to become old and die in their 80's.
Now, if the theory of heaven is correct, his first wife will be there waiting and she presumably will be the same age as when she died.
So the guy and his new wife appear, and they're both in their 80's....
How does this work exactly? Even if you disregard the age issue, how awkward would the big reunion be when he has a new wife?
LOL
Well you are assuming we will be as we are here. Scripture says we will have glorified bodies. That our physical bodies are like a seed husk we shake off.
And the realm of God exists outside of time. Time doesnt exist there. We cant fathom an existence free of time. We have no way to comprehend that.
God ordained marriage as a reflection of the covenant between Christ and His church(the body of believers....not like the church as we understand it being buildings and everyone inside. The Bride of Christ is the believers in Christ....those purchased by His shed blood). That's what marriage is a reflection of.
So in the realm of God....we will be different. Free from sin. In glorified (and ageless) bodies, and our relationship to eachother will be perfect. Different than here, but perfect.
And what about the animals! Is there a doggo and kitteh heaven?
Of course there is. Look at all the animals and life God created.....God loves animal life ♡ they all belong to Him.
There will be animals we have probably never seen and we be able to communicate with all of them.
You ever see the twilight zone episode called "The Hunt"
It deals with dogs and heaven and is really good.
When I was a little girl I saw an episode of the Twighlight Zone that involved a doll coming to life and it terrified me so much I never watched another one LOL.
I'll check it out though.
Talking Tina! That’s my fav episode
LotusbudWanna see what gave me nightmares as a kid? That fucking witch in Terrahawks...
I think I stumbled into the wrong thread here.
Is this about magic realism?
So many people claim to know God's mind and God's will. And every such claim to knowledge is different from every other.
I'll admit I'm not as worried about whether God has a sense of humour as I am about the size of His toenail clippings.
Far be it from me to unnecessarily challenge others on their views of Ultimate Reality (for there are as many such views as there are people who hold them) but I've gone backward and forward (and even sideways and up and down) on all the traditional "proofs" for the existence of God--from the ontological through the teleological to the argument from design--and I'm still left wondering why an all-powerful God can't create a boulder so heavy that even He couldn't lift it.
And now this: if animals gain entry into heaven, who's in charge of making sure the tarantulas don't fall into the shark pool?
LotusbudWanna see what gave me nightmares as a kid? That fucking witch in Terrahawks...