- Messages
- 23,450
- Location
- Halfway Up Ben Nevis
And what's liberal about hating people due to the colour of their skin? I.E whites
Really? Look pal, nobody likes a commie, and particularly one who murders people out of paranoia and hatred of dissenting opinion - that's a conservative thing since, of course by definition, Liberalism is inclusive. Conservatism is exclusive - as for example were the Nazis, and their modern Trumptarded iteration.Yet he's the libtards hero...Exactly all the proof that you need that he was a conservative and not at all a Liberal as I have oft stated.Stalin was a demonrat and murder is their way!The term leftist in the way I approve of it's use means commie. Liberalism (the foundation of Western Democracy and capitalist societies) is the opposite of Commie, FairyAnn. We've been over this many times, but your granite skull never never absorbs this well understood information. Pick up a book sometime, why doncheh.Liberals are leftists
In 2011, after assessing twenty years of historical research in Eastern European archives, American historian Timothy D. Snyder stated that Stalin deliberately killed about 6 million, which rise to 9 million if foreseeable deaths arising from policies are taken into account.
In my view pure race hate is of course illiberal.And what's liberal about hating people due to the colour of their skin? I.E whites
Hitler was right! Europeans signed their own death warrant defeating him but there WILL be another uprising it's on the cards! I'm not ashamed to admit he's one of my heros!Really? Look pal, nobody likes a commie, and particularly one who murders people out of paranoia and hatred of dissenting opinion - that's a conservative thing since, of course by definition, Liberalism is inclusive. Conservatism is exclusive - as for example were the Nazis, and their modern Trumptarded iteration.Yet he's the libtards hero...Exactly all the proof that you need that he was a conservative and not at all a Liberal as I have oft stated.Stalin was a demonrat and murder is their way!The term leftist in the way I approve of it's use means commie. Liberalism (the foundation of Western Democracy and capitalist societies) is the opposite of Commie, FairyAnn. We've been over this many times, but your granite skull never never absorbs this well understood information. Pick up a book sometime, why doncheh.Liberals are leftists
In 2011, after assessing twenty years of historical research in Eastern European archives, American historian Timothy D. Snyder stated that Stalin deliberately killed about 6 million, which rise to 9 million if foreseeable deaths arising from policies are taken into account.
I got to give you credit for being honest about your view of things.Hitler was right! Europeans signed their own death warrant defeating him but there WILL be another uprising it's on the cards! I'm not ashamed to admit he's one of my heros!Really? Look pal, nobody likes a commie, and particularly one who murders people out of paranoia and hatred of dissenting opinion - that's a conservative thing since, of course by definition, Liberalism is inclusive. Conservatism is exclusive - as for example were the Nazis, and their modern Trumptarded iteration.Yet he's the libtards hero...Exactly all the proof that you need that he was a conservative and not at all a Liberal as I have oft stated.Stalin was a demonrat and murder is their way!The term leftist in the way I approve of it's use means commie. Liberalism (the foundation of Western Democracy and capitalist societies) is the opposite of Commie, FairyAnn. We've been over this many times, but your granite skull never never absorbs this well understood information. Pick up a book sometime, why doncheh.Liberals are leftists
In 2011, after assessing twenty years of historical research in Eastern European archives, American historian Timothy D. Snyder stated that Stalin deliberately killed about 6 million, which rise to 9 million if foreseeable deaths arising from policies are taken into account.
I can guarantee things would've been VERY different had our soldiers back then knew what we know now...
Even Churchill would've sided with Hitler!
What a load of shit!In my view pure race hate is of course illiberal.And what's liberal about hating people due to the colour of their skin? I.E whites
However not liking or trusting a class of people due to past/present injustices is at least understandable.
Do you Bass fish, Shemp? I think you need a challenge to keep you occupied.
Are the brown people in your bed with you now?
You've worn that thin already and I think you'll find it was initially used like this "Is Trump in the room with you now?"... Yet more proof the left are too retarded to come up with their own shit...Are the brown people in your bed with you now?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
What are you 12 years old?You've worn that thin already and I think you'll find it was initially used like this "Is Trump in the room with you now?"... Yet more proof the left are too retarded to come up with their own shit...Are the brown people in your bed with you now?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
Eh? haha listen to YOU...What are you 12 years old?You've worn that thin already and I think you'll find it was initially used like this "Is Trump in the room with you now?"... Yet more proof the left are too retarded to come up with their own shit...Are the brown people in your bed with you now?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
You're just acting stupid now... Your "pal" is a nonce and a weasel cunt end of...
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
Now take a few deep calming breaths.
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
You're just acting stupid now... Your "pal" is a nonce and a weasel cunt end of...
Did he post pepe and poopy too often for polite company?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
You're just acting stupid now... Your "pal" is a nonce and a weasel cunt end of...
Did he post pepe and poopy too often for polite company?
What are you 10?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
You're just acting stupid now... Your "pal" is a nonce and a weasel cunt end of...
Did he post pepe and poopy too often for polite company?
What are you 10?
No poopoo?
That finding would be legitimized by a LinK? perhaps.I think you'll find
Boyoh, I sure do like this Link:
It was all over the site, how many people would have maxis7656544 whatever the fuck he had exactly the same? There was three sites with warnings of illegal images that he was a member of, one of which he had been posting pictures of him and his wife, he went into full meltdown when they were posted here by Ice... 100% straight facts! He's removed all said pics from his illegal porn site so if that's not enough proof for you nothing will be... Everybody knows this to be true... THE END
More Linky:
You're just acting stupid now... Your "pal" is a nonce and a weasel cunt end of...
Did he post pepe and poopy too often for polite company?
What are you 10?
No poopoo?
No Twumpy wumpy?
I believe those stupid cunt palitrashians say the same type of shit. Fact is, filthy injuns were pagan worshiping animals and should have had their culture entirely snuffed out like some fukin philistines!Read some American history? Fucking hell…the foundation is spiritual, stemming from the natives of the land. You son are a legal alien.Read some American history. The entire foundation is religious.You’re gotdamn religious? Hahahahahaa…you’re a funny fucker!My politics is anchored in my religion as it should be. I'm nearly always right.@Lokmar Oi Lokky…just loosen up a bit, your politics is way off the mark anyway!
Pipe down moron. The Constitution is simply a gubermints operating manual for a country founded upon Judeo/Christianity.Now calm down there, don't be trying to move the goal posts and reframe MY question.Well asshole, there's a lot of lies and misinformation to unpack there....Hey dummy - the reason why there is a wall of separation between church and state written into the constitution is there was a desire to escape religious tyranny.Read some American history. The entire foundation is religious.You’re gotdamn religious? Hahahahahaa…you’re a funny fucker!My politics is anchored in my religion as it should be. I'm nearly always right.@Lokmar Oi Lokky…just loosen up a bit, your politics is way off the mark anyway!
And please - I am still waiting for Der Dummy Duhv to trace the biblical origins of the US Constitution (3 years - just one of the many unfounded wild claims she has made and I am sure continues to make) so don't you start with that shit.
..."Oh - the bible says thou "shall not kill" so our government is founded on the Bible"
Paaaahleez sucka..paaaahleez.
FIRST, The Constitution isnt Americas Founding Document, The Declaration of Independence is. There's all sorts of religious references there.
SECOND, the wall of separation you refer to cannot possibly refer to God because if it did, the Declaration would be null and void, meaning the Constitution that spawned from it is also invalid. PWN3D!
THIRD, The Bible obviously doesnt say "thou shall not kill" because God tells us to kill multiple times.
I could go on and on but its painfully obvious that you arent even as Biblically educated as my kids were at the age of 10.
KA-POWN3D!
Now just hold on there, Aaron. The question was - Trace how THE US CONSTITUTION is directly founded upon the Bible (easily I should point out that all that can be meant there in reality is certain people's interpretation of it).
"First" - no reference to any specific religion or specific god, and no reference at all to gods in the US Const which is the subject here.
"Second" - The reference is to religions, not personal beliefs in god etc..
"Third" Thou shalt not murder"(vs kill)? Point taken - but I think the careful reader understood I was joking anyway. And - I'll point out once again that in Christianity it is the teachings of the Christ through Jesus that matter, not the older Jewish beliefs which he came to reform.
I make this distinction because so many in the US claim this is a Christian nation and must be maintained as such. So lets stay focused on the teachings of Jesus, shall we. (I think you are very steeped in Jewism btw - never do you quote the avatar).
Also BTW - I know the answer to my own question, but no one has come close to THE REAL FACTS (sarcasm font enabled) yet.
Now before you go running off on some BS about inalienable rights (the DoI) let me point out that evidently Jefferson had no alignment with the person the concept was borrowed from in true spirit or practice or he would not have been a slaveholder nor would the nation be founded on the theft of land from, and murder of, the native peoples.
There is a prescribed method of circumcision and it doesnt involve sucking baby dicks.Since Israel's in the title...
Well why didn't ya just say so? That's all the proof I needed, Jacob.Pipe down moron. The Constitution is simply a gubermints operating manual for a country founded upon Judeo/Christianity.Now calm down there, don't be trying to move the goal posts and reframe MY question.Well asshole, there's a lot of lies and misinformation to unpack there....Hey dummy - the reason why there is a wall of separation between church and state written into the constitution is there was a desire to escape religious tyranny.Read some American history. The entire foundation is religious.You’re gotdamn religious? Hahahahahaa…you’re a funny fucker!My politics is anchored in my religion as it should be. I'm nearly always right.@Lokmar Oi Lokky…just loosen up a bit, your politics is way off the mark anyway!
And please - I am still waiting for Der Dummy Duhv to trace the biblical origins of the US Constitution (3 years - just one of the many unfounded wild claims she has made and I am sure continues to make) so don't you start with that shit.
..."Oh - the bible says thou "shall not kill" so our government is founded on the Bible"
Paaaahleez sucka..paaaahleez.
FIRST, The Constitution isnt Americas Founding Document, The Declaration of Independence is. There's all sorts of religious references there.
SECOND, the wall of separation you refer to cannot possibly refer to God because if it did, the Declaration would be null and void, meaning the Constitution that spawned from it is also invalid. PWN3D!
THIRD, The Bible obviously doesnt say "thou shall not kill" because God tells us to kill multiple times.
I could go on and on but its painfully obvious that you arent even as Biblically educated as my kids were at the age of 10.
KA-POWN3D!
Now just hold on there, Aaron. The question was - Trace how THE US CONSTITUTION is directly founded upon the Bible (easily I should point out that all that can be meant there in reality is certain people's interpretation of it).
"First" - no reference to any specific religion or specific god, and no reference at all to gods in the US Const which is the subject here.
"Second" - The reference is to religions, not personal beliefs in god etc..
"Third" Thou shalt not murder"(vs kill)? Point taken - but I think the careful reader understood I was joking anyway. And - I'll point out once again that in Christianity it is the teachings of the Christ through Jesus that matter, not the older Jewish beliefs which he came to reform.
I make this distinction because so many in the US claim this is a Christian nation and must be maintained as such. So lets stay focused on the teachings of Jesus, shall we. (I think you are very steeped in Jewism btw - never do you quote the avatar).
Also BTW - I know the answer to my own question, but no one has come close to THE REAL FACTS (sarcasm font enabled) yet.
Now before you go running off on some BS about inalienable rights (the DoI) let me point out that evidently Jefferson had no alignment with the person the concept was borrowed from in true spirit or practice or he would not have been a slaveholder nor would the nation be founded on the theft of land from, and murder of, the native peoples.
You sound disappointed, care to elaborate on that?There is a prescribed method of circumcision and it doesnt involve sucking baby dicks.Since Israel's in the title...