Tiny dancer JACK the pervert

Fredricka

Seek-Locate-Annihilate
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,306
Location
Somerset
At the very least binge watch 'Snatch', 'Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels', and 'Trainspotting'.

It won't fix 'em but it'll be a start.

**EDIT**

Almost forgot 'Quadrophenia'. My bad.
I can't remember the other films, lock stock is a good example though. Trainspotting is Scottish so you'll have blandscape on the warpath now :)
 

Lily

Goderator ☠️
Reaction score
23,077
Location
De donde me da la gana.
No.
That only counts if it's a person she considers a friend or a neutral.
The people she doesn't like are still valid targets and always will be.

Wrong.

Nuance dipshit, nuance. You think you're so profoundly intelligent and can't see the difference between two different people.

Jack may not be anyone's cup of tea, and I see all the same tendencies all of you do, I just don't see him exactly as all of you do.

Same with Bland, Admin, Lotus, Annaconda, Oldslow, Alticus and several others...

I think people that get off on calling fairly normal people on "perversions" and "abnormality" are always fucking weird their own damn selves.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: X

Lily

Goderator ☠️
Reaction score
23,077
Location
De donde me da la gana.
I'd say Jack is too, he's just not very good at it
On this we can disagree. To be perfectly honest, what I see in Jack, more than anything, seems to be that he backs off on his convictions when he meets a little resistance.

Maybe he cares about being accepted or liked too much. It seems once he knows it's a lost cause, he overcompensates.

Is that a bad way to go about things? Perhaps. He doesn't have a whole lot to lose though does he? He's damned regardless.

And for what?
 

Garraty_47

Have Coffee Will Shitpoast
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,758
Location
Redneckistan
Nuance dipshit, nuance. You think you're so profoundly intelligent and can't see the difference between two different people.

The only people I conflate 'round here are admin and seamajor (admajor) and that's only because they're both equally useless. You might notice I haven't said anything about sexual orientation, etc. when I've denigrated them. My complaint is that they're both similarly fucking boring and repetitive.

I'm no bandwagon jumper and the interactions between you and I are a great example of that. When have I ever alluded to your alleged physical characteristics, for instance? I call out your personal attitudes and behavior as displayed by the things you poast. Very specific. Very individual.

The same principle applies for everyone else poasting here, too.

But sure... tell me again how I can't "see the difference" between different people as if that's an actual thing and not some bollox you only pulled out of your arse in the heat of the moment.

Jack may not be anyone's cup of tea, and I see all the same tendencies all of you do, I just don't see him exactly as all of you do.

IOW: he's a neutral. /rollEyes

Same with Bland, Admin, Lotus, Annaconda, Oldslow, Alticus and several others...

What about them?
Hell, I don't remember having any conversations at all with some of those people and are you inferring I interact with Blandy the same way I do with Lotus? Or you? In which bizarro universe does this happen?

I think people that get off on calling fairly normal people on "perversions" and "abnormality" are always fucking weird their own damn selves.

I don't know about weird but I will say it seems a kinda lazy and unimaginative way to go about things. The trope "phoning it in" comes to mind. In my opinion why bother, if that's all ya got?

But that's just me as a particular individual who doesn't expect much less demand that others follow my lead. See? That's another way in which we differ.