The implication? Seriously?Whats the implication here?
Help us out a bit.
That's not at all what you asked me.Well Id say the implication in the second picture is that the Clintons invited the person convicted of trafficing under age girls, that was associated with someone convicted of using underage girls two years prior.....to their daughters wedding. Why did Slick Willie and Killary do that?
Now.....I asked you first......did you read the article you posted?
I don't know. Ask Trump.Why associate with known sex offenders?
Yes.....yes it was.......I'll ask you again......what is the implication of the first picture? Should be an easy one to answer for you, unless you dont care for it?That's not at all what you asked me.
Interesting......someone taking responsibility for making a mistake in government. So rarely, if ever seen with Dumbocrats
Can you provide the date this picture was taken?.....it is extremely relevant.....I really do want to know why/when Trump associated with a known sex offender like Slick Willie and Killary did......
The history of Trump's relationship with Epstein is pretty public. And you can just look at Ivanka in that pic and figure out when it was. I don't need to do the research for you. Anyway, it doesn't fucking matter. When President Trump appointed Acosta as his Labor Secretary, and then whinged when Acosta resigned, Trump knew that Epstein had already been tried in court in Florida for sex trafficking minors, and that he had been found guilty. Acosta is the one who saw to it that the charges against Epstein were reduced and that Epstein did virtually no prison time and was able to continue sex trafficking after the conviction. Trump hired him anyway (or more likely, as a result). Think about that, and don't be a salivating partisan while you do your thinking.Can you provide the date this picture was taken?.....it is extremely relevant.....I really do want to know why/when Trump associated with a known sex offender like Slick Willie and Killary did......
How are "Did you read the article?" and "What is the implication of the first picture?" the same question? SMDHYes.....yes it was.......I'll ask you again......what is the implication of the first picture? Should be an easy one to answer for you, unless you dont care for it?
I'll say this one more fucking time for the hard of thinking.Speaking of sex abuse and creeper allegations.......
My first postWhats the implication here?
Help us out a bit.
Easy LB......I did not imply you were a Democrat.....but if you look a little deeper.....you will determine the point of my initial question.I'll say this one more fucking time for the hard of thinking.
I did not vote for Biden. I am not a Democrat.
I posted the pic of Ghislaine at Chelsea's wedding AND the pic of Trump because I am willing to bet my life that both men knew Jeffrey was a sex trafficker, and both men were fine with it. I'm no partisan hack.
Oi fuckwad, sit there and defend a pedoooo all day, you realllllly think Trumpf didn't know what the perv was doing ??My first post
Ill repeat the question......what is the implication of Trump and two of his children pictured with Epstien at what I believe is the grand opening of a restaurant?
Would you please answer the question
I’d say so. Fatso is a convicted rapist. Did ya forget?Wasnt any child in attendence at risk?
Give me a break. You're an apologist for Trump. Straight up. The man is evil. He fucking appointed Acosta, knowing what he had done. Acosta's apology was PR, nothing more.Easy LB......I did not imply you were a Democrat.....but if you look a little deeper.....you will determine the point of my initial question.
From your post
"both men knew Jeffrey was a sex trafficker".........are you sure of this?
My comment was that Acosta acknowledged his role in the light sentence that Epstien received and acted in a manner so as not hinder the work of the Labor Dept. He stepped down.......Not many Democrats (that you don't affiliate with) do the same when confronted with the same situation.
Question:
Would you take your young kids to the opening of a sex trafficker's restaurant?
Yoor point?
Again.......did you read the article?Question:
Would you take your young kids to the opening of a sex trafficker's restaurant?