You’re angry, do you want to share your feelings with us?"I got emotional watching it..." Red Flag #1. People need to feel less often and think more often. Or, in some cases, at all.
Let's continue.
Being against oligarchy is great. Let's look into that word:
oligarchy /ŏl′ĭ-gär″kē, ō′lĭ-/
noun
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at
- Government by a few, especially by a small faction of persons or families.
- Those making up such a government.
- A state governed by a few persons.
Does Sanders include the various layers of unelected bureaucrats within Federal and state governments in that? Because appointees aren't answerable to the voters, making that body of bureaucrats fit the above definition. We'll see if Sanders addresses that, or if he misapplies the definition to 'a group of people the voters approved of but whom I do not." (Spoiler alert: he does not.)
Sanders asks, at timestamp 2:03, "What is it like living paycheck to paycheck?" And well he should ask;
Like any skilled con artist -- and I'll give the old devil his due, he is a skilled con artist, having been in constant practice at his craft for over fifty years now -- he preys on the emotional malleability of his listeners.
But he's also the man who accepted a nice juicy payday from the DNC to "take a dive" in 2016, and then did it again in 2020.
This just proves that, like the good Socialist he's always been, he's more than happy to spread the wealth -- as long as it's other peoples' wealth.
(laughter) It's time! (laughter) for a good old fashioned slap and crap!You’re angry, do you want to share your feelings with us?
Empathy is the great weakness of western democracy. (Elon Musk 3/25)People need to feel less often and think more often. Or, in some cases, at all.
Save that shit, you ain't no fuckin' preacher.Now that is some horrible inhuman and unChristian shit right there.
Holliday knows how to catch little fishies, though.Save that shit, you ain't no fuckin' preacher.
Duh, dotard. But we are a Christian nation after all.Save that shit, you ain't no fuckin' preacher.
How much have you given, friend?Duh, dotard. But we are a Christian nation after all.
...and I most certainly are a preacher.
I will preach the tenets of true Christianity which is spiritual Liberalism and the antithesis of which is conservatism...aka evil, or in other words (evil is) anti-God/Nature and anti-evolution - It's present personification though MAGA/Trump/materialism in all it's grotesquery.
Here is a good Question:
.Is it possible for a conservative to be a Christian when selfishness is the cornerstone of conservatism?
How materialist to want giving quantified. Tisk tisk, Sir Reginald.How much have you given, friend?
No, in point of fact, we are not.But we are a Christian nation after all.
And yet it is your heros who say we are and must be.No, in point of fact, we are not.
I didn't say "how much money," I said "how much."How materialist to want giving quantified. Tisk tisk, Sir Reginald.
First: I have no heroes. Heroes, like any Abrahamic religion or any form of leftist collectivism, are for suckers.And yet it is your heros who say we are and must be.
I didn't mention money - that was in your mind.I didn't say "how much money," I said "how much."
What we give can mean many things besides the material, Holliday.
You seem to make the mistake of ascribing spiritual values to the the venality of secular politics, and that is kind of stupid, friend.
Just trying to help.
LoLz. Dude - You never had an original thought or perspective in your life. That is quit plain to be seen.First: I have no heroes. Heroes, like any Abrahamic religion or any form of leftist collectivism, are for suckers.
Second: Unlike you, I don't conform what I believe to what others believe based on who they are.
I mean, didn't you want to mention idoliters and Libertarians, MAGAs or other conservatives?like any Abrahamic religion or any form of leftist collectivism,
Cost you fifty bucks to get me to pretend to care what you think.LoLz. Dude - You never had an original thought or perspective in your life.
I didn't say "how much money," I said "how much."How materialist to want giving quantified. Tisk tisk, Sir Reginald.
Those must be good drugs, brother Holliday. ;)I didn't mention money - that was in your mind.
. I said quantify...by any unit.
2) yes, one can and does found political views in spiritual/metaphysical realities without theocracy,
because theosophy is not religion.
Let me help to show how they do coordinate and the extent to which one may inform the other w/o becoming civil law.
I like this example:
.We got this transgenderism thing...
Technology exists allowing the movement from one gender (physically) to another under maintenance.
. There is no reason, given our form of government, not to allow a person to make a personal decision to take advantage of it. Medical technology allows that it be, and if it is in any sense wrong then it's is victimless other than making a poor decision for one's self. That's my political view and is consistent with political Liberalism and self determination.
. However, from what would be considered a spiritual PoV, I would not advise it as a solution to some gender dystopia. That (to my view) is the same as saying the angels of Karma have no idea what they are up to and put a person in the wrong body....which is utter bullshit. Circumstance, of and in, a life are earned - they are yours to keep, and very much a person's to disregard if foolish enough, but (in my view) better to learn it's lessons, pay debt where found, and advantage blessings where they may be.
There...An Equinoctial offering.
Then again it has cost me nothing to gut hook you. LoLz@ the QuestardCost you fifty bucks to get me to pretend to care what you think.
One of these days, Red Lucy's going to show off her Deathclaws.Then again it has cost me nothing to gut hook you. LoLz@ the Questard
Quantifying (as you originally posted) is materialist in itself, Regg - that's the observation I made.What we give can mean many things besides the material, Holliday.
I'm not stoned enough to follow this weird logic your tossing out. It's almost as garbled as a Blandy vacaroo.Quantifying (as you originally posted) is materialist in itself, Regg - that's the observation I made.
. It's very much related to reward for actions, otherwise what is it balanced against?
Well, you should toke up.I'm not stoned enough to follow this weird logic your tossing out. It's almost as garbled as a Blandy vacaroo.
What if I told that I gave everything, and couldn't quantify that giving beyond counting all the days I was able to give, and ever since lamenting every day that I can no longer give?Well, you should toke up.
. What I've writ is not unusual.
There is no bigger, or morer in the spirit, Regg. There are no comparative units denoting size or quantity.
To be concerned with how much one has given (whatever exactly that means) is materialist. Why worry over how muchness?
tl;dr. Also, ts;dr (too stupid, didn't read)."I got emotional watching it..." Red Flag #1. People need to feel less often and think more often. Or, in some cases, at all.
Let's continue.
Being against oligarchy is great. Let's look into that word:
oligarchy /ŏl′ĭ-gär″kē, ō′lĭ-/
noun
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at
- Government by a few, especially by a small faction of persons or families.
- Those making up such a government.
- A state governed by a few persons.
Does Sanders include the various layers of unelected bureaucrats within Federal and state governments in that? Because appointees aren't answerable to the voters, making that body of bureaucrats fit the above definition. We'll see if Sanders addresses that, or if he misapplies the definition to 'a group of people the voters approved of but whom I do not." (Spoiler alert: he does not.)
Sanders asks, at timestamp 2:03, "What is it like living paycheck to paycheck?" And well he should ask;
Like any skilled con artist -- and I'll give the old devil his due, he is a skilled con artist, having been in constant practice at his craft for over fifty years now -- he preys on the emotional malleability of his listeners.
But he's also the man who accepted a nice juicy payday from the DNC to "take a dive" in 2016, and then did it again in 2020.
This just proves that, like the good Socialist he's always been, he's more than happy to spread the wealth -- as long as it's other peoples' wealth.
Yes, we do.Comment on that video:
How wonderful it is to see the rest of the country finally coming to appreciate Bernie. Vermont has progressive folks, and it also has very traditional, very conservative folks, and Bernie routinely gets 85% of our votes BECAUSE HE NEVER LIES TO US, HE NEVER SUGARCOATS. Thank you to all of you out there in the heartland who can see who he is.
The votes these idiots cast are helping to destroy the entire world. I hope they're pleased with themselves into the end times and beyond.Damn these idiots are tiresome