- Reaction score
- 622
- Location
- Sailing The Seas Of Cheese
That's not a rebuttal, you lazy, ignorant, halfwit menstrual scab.Breitbart!
![]()
“I not a trumptard!”
![]()
'Doctored' how, and by whom?They're not "gang members".
The doctored "photos" tell the tale.
Surprised at you.
the pics ICE used to pull this stunt off as proof have nothing to do with the people they attribute it to.'Doctored' how, and by whom?
It is my considered opinion, that this guy is not as wise as he thinks he is. No judgement just an observation.They're not "gang members".
The doctored "photos" tell the tale.
Surprised at you.
The New Republic?
Fuck you, moron. Agree with yourself. That agreement has nothing to do with reality.The New Republic?
Didn't the Huge Dripping Pussy just make fun of Breitbart?
Every single illegal alien criminal is a criminal and will be deported.
Any reason you vile and filthy criminal Democrat Scum WANT all these illegals here?
Have I told you yet today that you are an idiot?The New Republic?
Didn't the Huge Dripping Pussy just make fun of Breitbart?
Every single illegal alien criminal is a criminal and will be deported.
Any reason you vile and filthy criminal Democrat Scum WANT all these illegals here?
Neither does the New Republic.Fuck you, moron. Agree with yourself. That agreement has nothing to do with reality.
No. You've been slacking, pussy.Have I told you yet today that you are an idiot?
No idea who that is.Neither does the New Republic.
Did you ever jack off to that Katrina VanDenHooval broad?
Only by me? You're not surprised by Admin throwing up bullshit deflections?They're not "gang members".
The doctored "photos" tell the tale.
Surprised at you.
She's the New Republic cunt. She's always on those deranged Leftie "news" sites you get your information from.No idea who that is.
They're not "gang members".
The doctored "photos" tell the tale.
Surprised at you.
Such unmitigated bullshit.
And your op is not a fact, you gaslighting MAGAt.That's not a rebuttal, you lazy, ignorant, halfwit menstrual scab.
argumentum ad hominem - referring to a strategy this poster frequently uses - the frustrated loser attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by attempting to create a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged unfounded attribute of the opponent's character or background.That's not a rebuttal, you lazy, ignorant, halfwit menstrual scab.
As opposed to the deranged fascist sites you get yours from.She's the New Republic cunt. She's always on those deranged Leftie "news" sites you get your information from.
Style over substance fallacy. Yes, I added an epithet -- but I added an epithet to a statement pointing out a non-rebuttal. That's not an ad hominem.argumentum ad hominem - referring to a strategy this poster frequently uses - the frustrated loser attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by attempting to create a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged unfounded attribute of the opponent's character or background.
Lame weak minded attempt to deflect commonly used by OP clearly demonstrating he’s easily triggered, and frequently frustrated when confronted with facts ….actually more of a self own.
Irrelevant. The reporting is accurate, doesn't matter where it comes from.Breitbart!
How very nonpartisan.Irrelevant. The reporting is accurate, doesn't matter where it comes from.
Except when you don't like the source.Irrelevant. The reporting is accurate, doesn't matter where it comes from.
The belief that one's own view of reality is the only reality is the most dangerous of all delusions…you’re beyond delusional, you’re hopelessly gullible and your refusal to face or even consider facts makes me pity you.Style over substance fallacy. Yes, I added an epithet -- but I added an epithet to a statement pointing out a non-rebuttal. That's not an ad hominem.